This paper explores three aspects of the au pair migration experience, through a case study of Slovakians, mostly but not all women, who have returned from sojourns in the United Kingdom. First, it argues that au pairs are distinctive from other migrants working in domestic service. Their positions have to be understood in terms of a particular regulatory framework, temporal restrictions, living-in conditions, and the blurring of rights and responsibilities. Second, there is a need to consider the full cycle of migration. Returned au pairs have been able to commodify many aspects of their UK experiences, despite the constraints of relatively short visits, and the household and care work allocated to them. Third, understanding au pair migration as being socially and spatially constituted provides greater insights into their experiences and outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB, 1999, “Overseas domestic workers in the European Union: Invisible women”, in Gender, Migration and Domestic Service Ed. MomsenJ Henshall (Routledge, London) pp 117–133.
2.
AndersonB, 2000Doing the Dirty Work: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour (Zed Books, London).
3.
BakanAStasiulisD, 1995, “Making the match: Domestic placement agencies and the racialisation of women's household work”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society20303–335.
CastroM G, 1989, “What is bought and sold in domestic service? The case of Bogotá: A critical review”, in Muchachas no More: Household Workers in Latin America and the Caribbean Eds ChaneyE MCastroM G, (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 118–130.
6.
CochraneAPainK, 2000, “A globalizing society”, in A Globalizing World? Culture, Economics and Politics Ed. HeldD, (Routledge, London) pp 5–46.
7.
Council of Europe, 1969European Agreement on Au Pair PlacementCouncil of Europe, Strasbourg.
8.
CoxR, 1999, “The role of ethnicity in shaping the domestic employment sector in Britain”, in Gender, Migration and Domestic Service Ed. MomsenJ Henshall (Routledge, London) pp 134–147.
9.
CoxRWattP, 2002, “Globalization, polarization and the informal sector: The case of paid domestic workers in London”Area3439–47.
10.
DayL CIçduyguA, 1997, “The consequences of international migration for the status of women: A Turkish study”International Migration35337–371.
11.
DillB T, 1994Across the Boundaries of Race and Class: An Exploration of Work and Family Among Black Female Domestic Servants (Garland, New York).
12.
DustmannC, 1999, “Temporary migration, human capital and language fluency of migrants”Scandinavian Journal of Economics101297–314.
13.
ErmanTKalaycioğluSRitterberger-TiliçH, 2002, “Money earning activities and empowerment experiences of rural migrant women in the city: The case of Turkey”Women's Studies International Forum25395–410.
14.
GregsonNLoweM, 1994Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain (Routledge, London).
MomsenJ Henshall (Ed.), 1999aGender, Migration and Domestic Service (Routledge, London).
17.
MomsenJ Henshall, 1999b, “Maids on the move: Victim or victor”, in Gender, Migration and Domestic Service Ed. MomsenJ Henshall (Routledge, London) pp 1–20.
18.
HochschildA R, 2000, “Global care chains and emotional surplus value”, in On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism Eds HuttonWGiddensA, (Jonathan Cape, London) pp 130–146.
19.
IrekM, 1998Der Schmugglerzug: Warschau – Berlin – Warschau [The smugglers' train: Warsaw – Berlin – Warsaw] (Das Arabische Buch, Berlin).
20.
IsmailF MMomsenJ Henshall, 1997, “Migration as the nexus of gender and religion: The migration of Sri Lankan Muslim women to the Middle East”, in Migration and Gender: Place, Time and People Specific, A Collection of Papers Eds FairhurstH JBooysenIHattinghP S, Faculty of Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
21.
KingR, 2002, “Towards a new map of European migration”International Journal of Population Geography889–106.
22.
KingRRuiz-GelicesE, forthcoming, “International student migration and the European ‘year abroad’: Effect on European identity and subsequent migration behaviour”International Journal of Population Geography9229–252.
23.
LutzJ, 2002, “At your service madam! The globalization of domestic service”Feminist Review7089–104.
24.
MorokvasicM, 1993, “‘In and out’ of the labour market: Immigrant and minority women in Europe”New Community19459–484.
25.
ParreňasR S, 2001Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration and Domestic Work (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
26.
PatemanC, 1988The Sexual Contract (Polity Press, Cambridge).
27.
PhizackleaA, 1983One Way Ticket: Migration and Female Labour (Routledge, London).
28.
PrattG, 1999, “Is this Canada? Domestic workers' experiences in Vancouver, BC”, in Gender, Migration and Domestic Service Ed. MomsenJ Henshall (Routledge, London) pp 23–42.
29.
ReichR, 1992The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism (Vintage Books, New York).
30.
RomeroM, 1988, “Day work in the suburbs: The work experience of Chicana private housekeepers”, in The Worth of Women's Work: A Qualitative Synthesis Eds StrathamAMillerEMaukschH, (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
31.
SmithA, 1996, “From convergence to fragmentation: Uneven regional development, industrial restructuring, and the ‘transition to capitalism’ in Slovakia”Environment and Planning A28135–156.
32.
van ParijsP, 2000, “The ground floor of the world: On the socio-economic consequences of linguistic globalization”International Political Science Review21217–233.
33.
WilliamsA MBalážV, 1999, “Transformation and division in Central Europe”, in Divided Europe: Society and Territory Eds HudsonRWilliamsA M, (Sage, London) pp 163–184.
34.
WiliamsA MBalážV, 2004, “What human capital which migrants? Returned skilled migration to Slovaka from the UK”International Migration Review in press.
