The paper compares British and US government policy initiatives to combat financial exclusion and promote community reinvestment. Financial exclusion, a general term for those who lack financial products, is concentrated in a small number of deprived urban areas in larger cities that are also starved of private sector investment. British policies, though they have drawn on US experience, predominantly treat exclusion as an individual problem and pay insufficient attention to the wider interconnections between people and place that underlie financial exclusion. These are more prominent in the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that has led to significant improvements in financial inclusion and community investment in the USA. The CRA is underpinned by a more compartmentalised and locally embedded system of financial regulation. Consolidation in the banking sector and the growth of competition between banks and other financial institutions in an increasingly integrated US financial sector threaten this. British policies seek to provide ‘joined-up’ solutions to financial exclusion in a manner that is more in tune with an integrated financial sector where a small number of large banks compete on a level playing field with other financial institutions. The paper highlights the difficulties that these policies face in enlisting the cooperation of financial institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AveryR BBosticR WCalemP SCannerG B, 1997, “Changes in the distribution of branch offices”Federal Reserve Bulletin September, 707–725
BarthJ RBrumbaughDWilcoxJ A, 2000, “The repeal of Glass – Steagall and the advent of broad banking”Journal of Economic Perspectives14191–204
6.
BBA, 2000Promoting Financial Inclusion—The Work of the Banking IndustryBritish Bankers' Association, London, http://www.bba.org.uk/
7.
BBA, 2002Promoting Financial Inclusion—The Work of the Banking Industrythird edition, British Bankers' Association, London, http://www.bba.org.uk/
8.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2000, “The performance and profitability of CRA-related lending”, report submitted to the Congress pursuant to Section 713 of the Gramm – Leach – Bliley Act of 1999
9.
BriaultC, 1999, “The rationale for a single national financial services regulator”, OP 2, Financial Services Authority, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/
10.
BriaultC, 2002, “Revisiting the rationale for a single national financial services regulator”, OP 16, Financial Services Authority, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/
11.
BuxtonA, 1999, “Financial services: Serving the community?”, Speech to the Chartered Institute of Bankers, 19 January, http://www.bba.org.uk/
12.
Cabinet Office, 1999Modernising Government Cm 4310 (The Stationery Office, London)
13.
CannerG BPassmoreW, 1997, “The Community Reinvestment Act and the profitability of mortgage-orientated banks”, Economics Division Discussion Series 1997–7, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC
14.
CaskeyJ P, 2002Bringing Unbanked Households into the Banking SystemCentre on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
15.
Comptroller of the Currency, 1997Financial Access in the 21st Century Proceedings of a Forum, Comptroller of the Currency, Washington, DC
16.
Comptroller of the Currency, 2000, “Focus on retail financial services to underserved communities”Community Developments Fall, 1–19
17.
CorbettG, 2002, “The changing context of postal services in the UK”, Postwatch/PostComm Conference, 4–5 November, Inverness, http://www.postcomm.gov.uk
18.
CowellRMartinS, 2003, “The joy of joining up: Modes of integrating the local government modernisation agenda”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21159–179
19.
CrockettA, 2002, “Market discipline and financial stability”Journal of Banking and Finance26977–987
20.
DaleRWolfeS, 2003, “The UK Financial Services Authority: Unified regulation in the new market environment”, paper presented at the American Enterprise Institute's conference in Washington, DC, 21 February, available from University of Southampton, Southampton
21.
DaviesH, 2000, Speech at the Association of British Credit Unions Limited Annual Conference, 3 March, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/
22.
DeYoungRHunterW C, 2001Deregulation, the Internet, and the Competitive Viability of Large Banks and Community Banks WP 2001–11, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, IL
23.
DonovanNPalmerG, 1999Meaningful Choices. The Policy Options for Financial ExclusionNew Policy Institute, London, http://www.npi.org.uk/
24.
DymskiG AVeitchJ M, 1996, “Financial transformation and the metropolis: Booms, busts, and banking in Los Angeles”Environment and Planning A281233–1260
25.
Financial Services Act, 1986Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 60 (HMSO, London)
26.
FordJRowlingsonK, 1996, “Low-income households and credit: Exclusion, preference, and inclusion”Environment and Planning A281345–1360
27.
FrenchD, 1997The Case for Community BankingNew Economics Foundation, Cinnamon House, 6–8 Cole Street, London SE1 4HY
FullerDJonasA, 2002, “Institutionalising future geographies of financial inclusion: National legitimacy versus local autonomy in the British credit union movement”Antipode3485–110
30.
Group of Ten, 2001Report on Consolidation in the Financial Sector (OECD, Paris)
31.
HallidayG, 2002, “The Universal Bank: Prospects for the future”, paper given at the Tackling Financial Exclusion Conference, 30 January, Neil Stewart Associates, PO Box 39976, Benjamin Street, London EC1M 5YT
32.
HamblyM, 2002, “Boosting levels of enterprise in deprived communities”, paper given at the Tackling Financial Exclusion Conference, 30 January, Neil Stewart Associates, PO Box 39976, Benjamin Street, London EC1M 5YT
33.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Edward Arnold, London)
34.
TreasuryH M, 1999aAccess to Financial Services The Report of Policy Action Team 14, HM Treasury, London
35.
HM Treasury, 1999bCredit Unions of the Future, Credit Union Task Force, HM Treasury, London
36.
HM Treasury, 1999cEnterprise and Social Exclusion The Report of Policy Action Team 3, HM Treasury, London
37.
HogarthJ MO'DonnellK H, 1999, “Banking relationships of lower-income families and governmental trends towards electronic payment”Federal Reserve Bulletin July, 459–473
38.
ImmerluckD, 1999Unfinished Business: Increases in African-American Home Buying and Continuing Residential Segregation in the Chicago Region (Woodstock Institute, Chicago, IL)
39.
ImmerluckDSmithG, 2001, “Bigger, faster … but better? How changes in the financial services industry affect small business lending in urban areas”, discussion paper, Centre on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
Joint Center for Housing Studies, 2002The 25th Anniversary of the Community Investment Act: Access to Capital in an Evolving Financial Services SystemJoint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
42.
JonesR, 2003, “Eight million still can't get credit”The Guardian 8 January, page 19
KellyR, 2001b, “Tackling financial exclusion as a part of the social exclusion agenda”, Speech to the Finance for the Local Community Conference, 5 July, http://www.publicservice.co.uk
45.
KellyR, 2002, Speech by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury to the Annual Conference of the Association of British Credit Unions, 4 April, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/
46.
KempsonEJonesT, 2000Banking Without BranchesBritish Bankers Association, London, http://www.bba.org.uk/
47.
KempsonEWhyleyC, 1999Kept Out or Opted Out? Understanding and Combating Financial Exclusion (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York)
48.
KempsonEWhyleyCCaskeyJCollardS, 2000, “In or out? Financial exclusion: A literature and research review”, Consumer Research, OP 3, Financial Services Authority, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/
49.
KennickellA BStarr-McCluerMSuretteJ BFriesGLiA KLytleA L, 2000, “Recent changes in the US family finances: Results from the survey of consumer finances”Federal Reserve Bulletin861–29
50.
LeyshonAThriftN, 1997Money/Space, Geographies of Monetary Transformation (Routledge, London)
51.
LingT, 2002, “Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems”Public Administration80615–642
52.
LitanR ERauchJ, 1997American Finance for the 21st CenturyUS Department of Treasury, Washington, DC
53.
LitanR ERetsinasN PBelskyE SHaagWhite S, 2000The Community Reinvestment Act after Financial Modernization: A Baseline ReportUS Department of Treasury, Washington, DC
54.
LitanR ERetsinasN PBelskyE SFauthGKennedyMLeonardP, 2001The Community Reinvestment Act after Financial Modernization: A Final ReportUS Department of Treasury, Washington, DC
55.
LlewellynD, 2000, “Financial regulation: A perspective from the United Kingdom”Journal of Financial Services Research17309–317
56.
MaceyJ RMillerG P, 1993, “The community reinvestment act: An economic analysis”Virginia Law Review79291–348
57.
MarshallJ NWillisRRichardsonR, 2003, “Demutualisation, strategic choice, and social responsibility”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21735–760
58.
MayoEMullineuxA, 1999Show and Tell: A Community Reinvestment Act for the UKNew Economics Foundation, Cinnamon House, 6–8 Cole Street, London SE1 4HY
59.
MayoEFisherTConatyPDolingJMullineuxA, 1998Small is Bankable. Community Reinvestment in the UKNew Economics Foundation, Cinnamon House, 6–8 Cole Street, London SE1 4HY
60.
MoranM, 1991The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution (Macmillan, London)
Policy and Innovation Unit, 2000aWiring it up. Whitehall's Management of Cross-cutting Policies and ServicesCabinet Office, London
66.
Policy and Innovation Unit, 2000bAdding it up. Improving Analysis and Modelling in Central GovernmentCabinet Office, London
67.
Policy and Innovation Unit, 2000cCounter RevolutionCabinet Office, London
68.
Postcomm, 2001Post Offices, Customers and Communities Postcomms First Annual Report on the Network of Post Offices: 2000–1, Postal Services Commission, London, http://www.psc.gov.uk/
69.
Postcomm, 2002Access to Post Office Services: Time to Act Postcomm's Second Annual Report, Postal Services Commission, London
70.
PrattD J, 1998, “Re-placing money: The evolution of branch banking in Britain”Environment and Planning A302211–2226
71.
SandlerR, 2002Medium and Long Term Savings—A Review (The Stationery Office, London)
72.
ShullB, 1999, “The separation of banking and commerce in the United States: An examination of principle issues”Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments81–55
73.
SinclairS P, 2001Financial Exclusion: An Introductory SurveyCentre for Research into Socially Inclusive Services, Edinburgh College of Art, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh
74.
Social Exclusion Unit, 2001A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action PlanCabinet Office
SpeakSGrahamS, 1999, “Service not included: Private services restructuring, neighbourhoods, and social marginalisation”Environment and Planning A311985–2001
77.
SpiersS, 2002, “Credit unions: New powers”, Paper given at the Tackling Financial Exclusion Conference, 30 January, Neil Stewart Associates, PO Box 39976, Benjamin Street, London EC1M 5YT
78.
StegmanM A, 1999Savings for the Poor: The Hidden Benefits of Electronic Banking (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
79.
StegmanM ACochranKFarisR, 2002, “Creating a score card for the CRA service test”, Policy Briefing 96, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
80.
SweeneyT, 1999The Death of BankingBritish Bankers' Association, London, http://www.bba.org.uk/
81.
Treasury Select Committee, 1999aTreasury Committee Ninth Report on Demutualisation Volume I, Report and Proceedings of the Committee, House of Commons, Session 1998–99, 605–II (The Stationery Office, London)
82.
Treasury Select Committee, 1999bTreasury Committee Ninth Report on Demutualisation Volume II, Minutes of Evidence and Appendices, House of Commons, Session 1998–99, 605–II (The Stationery Office, London)
83.
Treasury Select Committee, 1999cDemutualisation: The Government's Response to the Committee's Ninth Report of Session 1998–99 House of Commons, Session 1998–99, 880 (The Stationery Office, London)
84.
Treasury Select Committee, 2001Treasury Committee Fifth Report, Proceedings, Minutes of Evidence and Appendices on Banking and the Consumer House of Commons Session 2000–2001, HC 138 (The Stationery Office, London)
85.
Urban Institute, 1999What we Know About Mortgage Lending Discrimination in AmericaUS Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC
86.
HaagWhite S, 2000Community Reinvestment and Cities: A Literature Review of the CRA's Impact and FutureCentre on Urban, Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
87.
HaagWhite S, 2002, “Community reinvestment: A review of urban outcomes and challenges”International Regional Science Review25252–275
