A key question faced by practitioners trying to plan for sustainable development is: what can be done in planning practice to influence promotion of sustainable development? This research addresses that question by investigating three dimensions of the planning process (political support for the concept, participation, and resource commitment), the organization of local land-use plans, and state planning mandates to determine how they influence the support plan policies have for principles of sustainable development. We use plan content analysis as well as survey data for forty-two communities across the United States to analyze factors which influence such support. Our findings highlight that the presence of a state planning mandate, most applicable to US planning, as well as having a variety of groups participating in the planning process, are key factors that increase overall plan support for the sustainable development principles. Recommendations for planning practice are offered based on our findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JörbyAdolfsson S, 2002, “Local Agenda 21 in four Swedish municipalities: A tool toward sustainability?”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management45219–244.
2.
BarberD M, 1981Citizen Participation in American Communities: Strategies for Success (Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA).
3.
BeatleyT1995, “Planning and sustainability: The elements of a new (improved?) paradigm”Journal of Planning Literature9383–395.
4.
BeatleyTManningK, 1997The Ecology of Place (Island Press, Washington, DC).
5.
BerkeP R, 1994, “Evaluating environmental plan quality: The case of planning for sustainable development in New Zealand”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management37155–169.
6.
BerkeP RBeatleyT, 1992Planning for Earthquakes: Risk, Policy, and Politics (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
7.
BerkeP RConroyM M, 2000, “Planning for sustainable development: Measuring and explaining progress in plans”Journal of the American Planning Association6621–33.
8.
BerkeP RFrenchS P, 1994, “The influence of state planning on local plan quality”Journal of Planning Education and Research13237–250.
9.
BerkeP RRoenigkD JKaiserE JBurbyR, 1996, “Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management3979–96.
BlowersA, 1993, “The time for change”, in Planning for a Sustainable Environment Ed. BlowersA (Earthscan, London) pp 1–18.
12.
BurbyR JDaltonL C, 1994, “Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas”Public Administration Review54229–238.
13.
BurbyR JMayP J, 1997Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use with BerkeP R (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
14.
CampbellS, 1996, “Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development”Journal of the American Planning Association62296–313.
15.
CounsellD, 1999, “Attitudes to sustainable development in planning: Policy integration, participation and Local Agenda 21, a case-study of the Hertfordshire structure plan”Local Environment4(1) 21–32.
16.
CroninW, 1995, “The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature”, in Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature Ed. CroninW (W W Norton, New York) pp 23–68.
17.
CrowfootJ EWondolleckJ M, 1990Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution (Island Press, Washington, DC).
18.
DaltonL C, 1989, “The limits of regulation: Evidence from local plan implementation in California”Journal of the American Planning Association55151–168.
19.
DaltonL CBurbyR J, 1994, “Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management”Journal of the American Planning Association60444–461.
20.
DayD, 1997, “Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept?”Journal of Planning Literature11421–434.
21.
DeGroveJ M, 1992Planning and Growth Management in the States (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA).
22.
DeyleR ESmithR A, 1998, “Local government compliance with state planning mandates”Journal of the American Planning Association64457–469.
23.
GrantJ, 1994The Drama of Democracy, Contention and Dispute in Community Planning (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
24.
GrantJManuelPJoudreyD, 1996, “A framework for planning sustainable residential landscapes”Journal of the American Planning Association62331–345.
25.
HealeyPShawT, 1997, “Planners, plans and sustainable development”Regional Studies27769–776.
26.
HellingA, 1998, “Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta's Vision 2020 Project”Journal of the American Planning Association64335–350.
27.
HesterR, 1999, “A refrain with a view (a new approach to local citizen participation in community design)”Places12(2) 12–25.
28.
InnesJ E, 1996, “Planning through consensus building”Journal of the American Planning Association62460–472.
29.
KaiserE JGodschalkD RChapinF SJr, 1995Urban Land Use Planning (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL).
30.
LowryKAdlerPMilnerN, 1997, “Participating the public: Group process, politics, and planning”Journal of Planning Education and Research16177–187.
31.
LucyW H, 1994, “If planning includes too much, maybe it should include more”Journal of the American Planning Association60305–318.
32.
MayP, 1993, “Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12634–663.
33.
MilesMHubermanA M, 1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).
34.
NeumanM, 1998, “Does planning need the plan?”Journal of the American Planning Association64208–221.
35.
OlsonR L, 1995, “Sustainability as a social vision”Journal of Social Issues51(4) 15–36.
36.
Oregon Visions Project Committee, 1993, “A guide to community visioning: Hands-on information for local communities”, Oregon Chapter, American Planning Association, Portland, OR.
37.
PotapchukW R, 1996, “Building sustainable community politics: Synergizing participatory, institutional, and representative democracy”National Civic Review85(3) 54–60.
38.
PotapchukW RCrockerJ PJr, 1999, “Exploring the elements of civic capital”National Civic Review88(3) 175–201.
39.
ReesW E, 1990, “Defining ‘sustainable development’”, CHS Research Bulletin, UBC Centre for Human Settlements, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
40.
ReesW E, 1995, “Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation?”Journal of Planning Literature9343–361.
41.
RoheW MGatesL B, 1985Planning with Neighborhoods (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).
42.
RoselandM, 1998Toward Sustainable Communities (New Society Publishers, Stony Creek, CT).
43.
RoweJFudgeC, 2003, “Linking national sustainable development strategy and local implementation: A case study in Sweden”Local Environment8(2) 125–140.
44.
ShipleyR, 2002, “Visioning in planning: Is the practice based on sound theory?”Environment and Planning A347–22.
45.
ShipleyRNewkirkR, 1998, “Visioning: Did anybody see where it came from?”Journal of Planning Literature12407–416.
46.
ShipleyRNewkirkR, 1999, “Vision and visioning in planning: What do these terms really mean?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26573–592.
47.
ShutkinW A, 2000The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-first Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
48.
SnowD, 1994, “Wise use and public lands in the West”Utne Reader6370–78.
49.
UN, 1992Earth Summit: Agenda 21, The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio (United Nations Publications, New York).
50.
ViedermanS, 1993, “Sustainable development: What is it and how do we get there?”Current History92(573) 180–187.
51.
WCED, 1987Our Common FutureWorld Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
52.
WheelerS, 1996Sustainable Urban Development: A Literature Review and AnalysisInstitute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
53.
WildAMarshallR, 1999, “Participatory practice in the context of local agenda 21: A case study evaluation of experience in three English local authorities”Sustainable Development7151–162.
