Peru has been transformed over the course of the past decade into a neoliberal, mineral-based, export-oriented, country. The author evaluates the neoliberal transformation of the country in three parts. First he examines the economic and political transformation of the country in the early 1990s, particularly in terms of how the Peruvian state and economy were rapidly restructured according to neoliberal principles. He then illustrates how, both through privatization and through transnationalization, the mining sector has become a key element for future development opportunities. This discussion is then contextualised by an examination of how mining activities are affecting land-tenure patterns and livelihoods in the Cajamarca region of Peru. In particular, drawing upon case-study research, the author evaluates how Minera Yanacocha's transnational gold-mining operations are transforming land-tenure institutions, land values, and the spatial distribution of land-use patterns throughout the region. In addition, he evaluates how livelihoods are being transformed in response to Minera Yanacocha's activities through an examination of changing household access to natural, human, social, and economic resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BebbingtonA, 1999, “Capitals and capabilities: A Framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty”World Development272021–2044.
2.
BebbingtonA, 2000, “Reencountering development: Livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90495–520.
3.
BebbingtonA, 2002, “Geographies of development in Latin America?”, in Latin America in the 21st Century: Challenges and Solutions Ed. KnappG (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 105–148.
4.
BeckerD, 1983The New Bourgeoisie and the Limits of Dependency: Mining, Class, and Power in “Revolutionary” Peru (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
5.
BridgeG, 2002, “Grounding globalization: The prospects and perils of linking economic processes of globalization to environmental outcomes”Economic Geography78361–386.
6.
BuryJ, 2002The Political Ecology of Transnational Gold Mining Corporations and the Transformation of Livelihoods in Cajamarca, Peru unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
7.
BuryJ, 2004, “Livelihoods in transition: Transnational gold mining operations and local change in Cajamarca, Peru”Geographic Journal17078–91.
8.
BuryJKolffA, 2003, “Livelihoods, mining and peasant protests in the Peruvian Andes”Journal of Latin American Geography13–17.
9.
CaravedoB, 1998El Impacto Social de las Empresas Mineras en el Peru [The social impact of mining companies in Peru] Seguimiento Analisis y Evaluatión para el Desarrollo, Lima.
10.
CONITE, 2001a, “Registered foreign investment”, Comisión Nacional de Inversiones y Tecnologias.
CONITE, 2001bPeru Legal Framework for Mining Comisión Nacional de Inversiones y Tecnologiás.
13.
Extrajeras, Lima.
14.
CONOCAMI, 2000El Rostro de la Minería en las Comunidades del Peru [The roster of mining in the communities of Peru] Coordinadora Nacional de Comunidades del Peru Afectadas por la Minería, Lima.
15.
Cooperatión, 1999Minería y Comunidades [Mining and communities] Acción Solidaria para el Desarrollo, Lima.
16.
DeereC D, 1990Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
17.
DeereC DLeónM, 2001Empowering Women: Land and Property Rights in Latin America (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
18.
Directorio Minero del Peru, 2000Directorio Minero del Peru 2000[Mining directory of Peru 2000] Promotores y Consultores Andinos SRL, Lima.
INGETEC, 2003Informe Final de la Auditoria Ambiental y Evaluaciones Ambientales de las Operaciones de Minera Yanacocha en Cajamarca [Final environmental evaluation report of Minera Yanacocha's operations in Cajamarca] INGETEC, Colombia, http://www.ingetec.com.co.
30.
KlakT, 1998Globalization and Neoliberalism: The Caribbean Context (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD).
31.
KuczynskiP, 2000, “The impact of privatization in Peru”, in The Impact of Privatization in the Americas Eds BirchM HHaarJ (North–South Center Press, Miami, FL) pp 99–114.
32.
KuramotoJ, 1999Las Aglomeraciones Productivas Alrededor de la Minería: El Caso de Mínera Yanacocha S.A. [Productive agglomerations around mining: the case of Minera Yanacocha] Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo, Lima.
33.
LeachMMearnsRScoonesI, 1997, “Environmental entitlements: a conceptual framework for understanding the institutional dynamics of environmental change”, DP 359, Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
34.
LowenthalA, 1975The Peruvian Experiment: Continuity and Change Under Military Rule (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
35.
MartinezJ NOblitasJ J, 2000Situación y Condición de las Familias que Vendieron sus Tierras a MYSRL 1992–2000 [Situation and condition of the families that sold land to MYSRL 1992–2000] (CES E.I.R.L, Cajamarca).
36.
MayerE, 2002The Articulated Peasant: Household Economies in the Andes (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
37.
Ministry of Energy and Mines, 2000Reference Plan for Mining 2000–2009Ministry of Energy and Mines, Lima.
38.
Ministry of Energy and Mines, 2001Inversion en Minería 1992–2007 [Mining investment 1992–2007] Ministry of Energy and Mines, Lima.
39.
MurraJ V, 1985, “El archipelago vertical revisited”, in Andean Ecology and Civilization: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Ecological Complementarity Eds MasudaSShimadaIMorrisC (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo) pp 3–19.
40.
MYSA, 2002Yanacocha: Its Commitment with CajamarcaMinera Yanacocha, Cajamarca, Peru.
41.
Newmont, 2002South American OperationsNewmont Mining Corporation, Denver, CO.
42.
OssioJ, 1998Empresas Mineras y Poblaciones Rurales [Mining companies and rural populations] Instituto de Estudios Energético Mineros, Lima.
43.
Peru Monitor Monthly2000, “Mining: Plenty of glitter”775–78.
44.
Peru Report1999 (Peru Reporting, Lima).
45.
Proinversion, 2002Peru: Indicadores Económicos y Sociales [Economic and social indicators] Proinversion, Lima.
46.
Project Underground, 2001Complaint to the IFC Ombudsman OfficeProject Underground, Oakland, CA.
47.
Pulgar VidalJ, 1981Las Ocho Regiones Naturales del Peru [The eight natural regions of Peru] (Editorial Universo, Lima).
48.
SchwalbF, 2000Cajamarca: Dinamización de la Economía Local [Cajamarca: dynamics of the local economy] (IPAE, Cajamarca, Peru).
49.
ScoonesI, 1998, “Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis”, WP 72, Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
50.
SkidmoreTSmithP H, 2001Modern Latin America (Oxford University Press, New York).
51.
SlaterD, 1989Territory and State Power in Latin America (St Martin's Press, New York).
52.
ThorpRBertramI G, 1978Peru 1890–1970: Growth and Policy in an Open Economy (Columbia University Press, New York).
53.
ThorpRCardenasEOcampoJ A (Eds), 2000An Economic History of Twentieth-century Latin America (Palgrave, New York).
54.
WebbRFernández-BacaG, 1993Peru en Números 1993 [Peru in numbers 1993] (Instituto Cuanto, Lima).
55.
ZimmererK, 1999, “Overlapping patchworks of mountain agriculture in Peru and Bolivia: Toward a regional–global landscape model”Human Ecology27135–165.
