In this paper we explore the links between internal migration and international immigration in Canada's three largest metropolitan areas. In particular, we use a place-specific approach to test the displacement hypothesis that the migration behaviour of the less-well-educated native-born population is sensitive to the inflows of immigrants. Based on analyses of microdata from five consecutive censuses covering the period from 1981 to 2001, we find that the migration–immigration relationships are complex, often subtle, and inconsistent across the three cities. Growth in the immigrant population is correlated with an increased out-migration rate among the less-well-educated native-born population, but only in Toronto and Vancouver. This correlation, however, is not independent of changes in housing prices. We also find no consistent support for an alternative hypothesis that economic restructuring accounts for the net out-migration from immigrant gateway cities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorjasGFreemanRKatzL, 1997, “How much do immigration and trade affect labour market outcomes?”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) 11–67
2.
BourneL, 1999, “Migration, immigration and social sustainability: the recent Toronto experience in comparative context”, WP 5, Joint Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Settlement, 7th floor, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4
3.
BourneL, 2000, “Convergence or divergence? Migration and immigration in the Canadian urban system”, in Integrated Urban Systems and Sustainability of Urban Life Eds IanosIPumainDRacineJB (Editura Technica, Bucarest) pp 129–142
4.
ButcherKCardD, 1991, “Immigration and wages: evidence from the 1980s”American Economic Review81292–296
5.
CardD, 2001, “Immigration inflows, native outflows, and the local labour market impacts of higher immigration”Journal of Labour Economics1922–64
6.
CardDDiNardoJ, 2000, “Do immigrant inflows lead to native outflows?”AEA Papers and Proceedings90360–367
7.
ChampionAG, 1994, “International migration and demographic change in the developed world”Urban Studies31653–677
EllisMWrightR, 1998, “The Balkanization metaphor in the analysis of US immigration”Annals of the Association of American Geographers88688–698
11.
FilerR, 1992, “The effect of immigrant arrivals on migratory patterns of native workers”, in Immigration and the Workforce: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas Eds BorjasGFreemanR (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 245–269
12.
FreyW, 1995a, “Immigration and internal migration ‘flight’ from US metropolitan areas: towards a new demographic balkanization”Urban Studies32744–757
13.
FreyW, 1995b, “Immigration and internal migration ‘flight’: a California case study”Population and Environment16353–375
14.
FreyW, 2002a, “Three Americas: the rising significance of regions”Journal of the American Planning Association68349–355
15.
FreyW, 2002b, “A history of recent urban development in the United States”, in International Handbook of Urban Systems Ed. GeyerHS (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 365–390
16.
FreyWLiawKXieYCarlsonM, 1996, “Interstate migration of the US poverty population: immigration ‘pushes’ and welfare magnet ‘pulls’”Population and Environment17491–536
17.
HarrisonR, 2002, “Moving out when minorities move in”American Demographics June, 23–24
18.
KritzMMGurakDT, 2001, “The impact of immigration on the internal migration of natives and immigrants”Demography38133–145
19.
LeyD, 2003, “Offsetting immigration and domestic migration in gateway cities: Canadian and Australian reflections on an ‘American dilemma’” WP 03-01, Vancouver Centre of Excellence: Research on Immigration and Integration in the Metropolis, http://www.riim.metropolis.net/research-policy/researchpolicy2/papers_e5.html
20.
LeyDTutchenerJ, 2001, “Immigration, globalisation and house prices in Canada's gateway cities”Housing Studies16199–223
21.
MooreEGRosenbergMW, 1995, “Modelling migration flows of immigrant groups in Canada”Environment and Planning A27699–714
22.
NewboldKB, 1996, “Internal migration of the foreign-born in Canada”International Migration Review30728–747
23.
Statistics Canada (Ministry of Supply and Service, Ottawa, ON) 1982, 1981 Census Dictionary, Catalogue no. 99-901
24.
Statistics Canada (Ministry of Supply and Service, Ottawa, ON) 1987, 1986 Census Dictionary, Catalogue no. 99-101E
25.
Statistics Canada (Ministry of Supply and Service, Ottawa, ON) 1992, 1991 Census Dictionary, Catalogue no. 92-301E
26.
Statistics Canada (Ministry of Supply and Service, Ottawa, ON) 1999, 1996 Census Dictionary, final edition, Catalogue no. 92-351-UPE
27.
Statistics Canada (Ministry of Supply and Service, Ottawa, ON) 2002, 2001 Census Dictionary, Reference, Catalogue no. 92-3378-XPE
StevensonM, 2000, “Canada's other brain drain: the continuing exodus from Quebec”Policy Options October, 63–66
30.
The Economist2003, “London's comings and goings” 9 August, page 24
31.
WalkerREllisMBarffR, 1992, “Linked migration systems: Immigration and internal labour flows in the United States”Economic Geography68234–248
32.
WhiteMImaiY, 1994, “The impact of US immigration upon internal migration”Population and Environment15189–209
33.
WhiteMLiangZ, 1998, “The effect of immigration on the internal migration of the native-born population, 1981–1990”Population Research and Policy Review17141–166
34.
WrightREllisMReibelM, 1997, “The linkage between immigration and internal migration in large metropolitan areas in the United States”Economic Geography73234–254
