Why does metropolitan reform have such a poor track record in the United States as compared with other industrialized countries? The most common answer is the exceptional localism of US culture, which has embedded itself over the years in institutions that foster political fragmentation and sprawl. This paper, inspired by recent developments in Europe, offers an alternative explanation in the divided sovereignty of the US federal system. Sovereignty, a highly debated concept at the global level, remains a very real political hurdle at the local level because it constitutes the primary field of struggle for any claims for local self-government. The significance of divided sovereignty is the potential recourse that a second sovereign can offer to metropolitan reformers. A reframing of the issue from a constitutional perspective reveals a sharp contrast in the political conditions for metropolitan reform between Europe and the USA today: as sovereignty has moved up in Europe, secured by treaties that have shifted whole realms of authority and right to the European Union, it has been moving down in the USA, pushed by a generation of Republican presidents and an activist Supreme Court. It also highlights a political fault line that has been largely missing from theoretical and policy debates over metropolitan reform in the USA: the conflict between the big cities and their direct sovereign, the subnational states. In this paper I reconsider the troubled history of metropolitan reform in the United States from this constitutional perspective, situating efforts to achieve metropolitan self-governance in the context of the shifting division of sovereignty in the US federal system over the past seventy years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgliettaM, 1979A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (New Left Books, London)
2.
AgnewJCorbridgeS, 1995Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy (Routledge, New York)
3.
AltshulerAMorrillWWolmanHMitchelF, 2001Governance and Opportunity in Metropolitan America (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
4.
AminA, 1999, “An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365–378
5.
BanfieldEWilsonJ, 1963City Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
6.
BarlowI, 1991Metropolitan Government (Routledge, New York)
BrennerN, 2004, “Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe”Review of International Political Economy11447–488
9.
BrinkleyA, 1995The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (Kopf, New York)
10.
CalthorpePFultonW, 2001The Regional City (Island Press, Washington, DC)
11.
CastellsM, 1989The Informational City (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
12.
CED, 1970Reshaping Government in Metropolitan AreasCommittee for Economic Development, 2000 L Street, NW suite 700, Washington, DC 20036
13.
CisnerosH, 1996Interwoven Destinies: Cities and the Nation (Norton, New York)
14.
ClarkJ, 1938The Rise of a New Federalism: Federal–State Cooperation in the United States (Columbia University Press, New York)
15.
ConlanT, 1998From New Federalism to Devolution: Twenty-five Years of Intergovernmental Reform (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
16.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Associational Economy: Firms Regions and Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
17.
CP, 1955aPress Release, Office of the Mayor 29 December, Municipal Archives Box 6-9700, City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
18.
CP, 1955b, “Program of needed legislation”, memorandum from D Levin to the Urban Traffic and Transportation Board, 13 October, City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
19.
CP, 1956, “Plan and program: conclusions and recommendations of the board”, Urban Traffic and Transportation Board, City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
20.
CSG, 1962, “State responsibility in urban regional development: a report to the Governors' Conference”, Council of State Governments, 2760 Research Park Drive, PO Box 11910, Lexington, KY 40578-1910
21.
DanielsT, 2001, “Smart growth: a new American approach to regional planning”Planning Practice and Research16271–279
22.
DanielsonMHersheyABayneJ, 1973One Nation—So Many Governments (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
DonahueJ, 1996Disunited States (Basic Books, New York)
25.
DownsA, 1994New Visions for Metropolitan America (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
26.
EdnerSMcDowellB, 2002, “Surface-transportation funding in a new century: assessing one slice of the federal marble cake”Publius327–24
27.
ErieSKirlinJRabinovitzFLiebmanLHaarC, 1972Reform of Metropolitan Governments (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
28.
EserTKonstadakopulosD, 2000, “Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning”European Planning Studies8783–799
29.
FinegoldK, 1995Experts and Politicians: Reform Challenges to Machine Politics in New York, Cleveland and Chicago (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
30.
FlanaganR, 1997, “The Housing Act of 1954: the sea change in national urban policy”Urban Affairs Review33265–286
31.
FlorestanoPMarandoV, 1981The States and the Metropolis (Marcel Dekker, New York)
32.
ForsythM, 1981Unions of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation (Leicester University Press, Leicester)
33.
FriedenB, 1966, “Metropolitan America: challenge to federalism. A study submitted to the Intergovernmental relations subcommittee on Government Relations”, US House of Representatives, 89th Congress, 2nd Session (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
34.
FriedmannJBlochR, 1990, “American exceptionalism in regional planning 1933–2000”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14576–601
35.
FriskenFNorrisD, 2001, “Regionalism reconsidered”Journal of Urban Affairs23467–478
36.
FrugG, 1980, “The city as a legal concept”Harvard Law Review931059–1154
37.
FultonWPendallRNguyenMHarrisonA, 2001, “Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the US”, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
38.
GelfandM, 1975A Nation of Cities: The Federal Government and Urban America 1933–1965 (Oxford University Press, New York)
39.
GetimisP, 2003, “Improving European Union regional policy by learning from the past in view of enlargement”European Planning Studies1177–88
GoldmanTDeakinE, 2000, “Regionalism through partnerships? Metropolitan planning since ISTEA”Berkeley Planning Journal1446–75
42.
GordonPRichardsonH, 2001, “The sprawl debate: let markets plan”Publius31131–149
43.
GPF, 2002Regional Assets and Liabilities: Greater Philadelphia Opportunities for Initiatives in the Knowledge EconomyGreater Philadelphia First, 30 South 17th Street, Suite 1520, Philadelphia, PA 19103-4097
44.
GreerS, 1965Urban Renewal and American Cities: The Dilemma of Democratic Intervention (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN)
45.
GuntherJ, 1990Federal–City Relations in the United States: The Role of the Mayors in Federal Aid to Cities (University of Delaware Press, Newark, DE)
46.
HarlowM, 2001, “Social justice and the city: the new ‘liberal formulation’”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25889–897
47.
HarrisC, 1975, “A regional response to metro–urban problems”Growth and Change69–16
48.
HartmanR, 1974, “The state's role in regionalism”, in The Regionalist Papers Ed. MatthewsonK, The Metropolitan Fund, 211 West Ford Street, Detroit, MI 48226, pp 236–253
49.
HarveyD, 1985The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
50.
HawkinsBIhrkeD, 1999, “Reexamining the suburban exploitation thesis in American Metropolitan Areas”Publius29109–121
51.
HeatonK, 1974Hearings on Substate Regionalism: Substate Regionalism and the Federal System IVAdvisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DC
52.
HedgeD, 1998Governance and the Changing American States (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
53.
HeldD, 1995Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
54.
HinsleyF, 1986Sovereignty2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, New York)
55.
HuntingtonS, 1968Political Order in Changing Societies (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
56.
JacobsJ, 1961The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, New York)
57.
JohnP, 2000, “The Europeanisation of sub-national governance”Urban Studies37877–894
58.
JohnsM, 2003Moments of Grace: The American City in the 1950s (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
59.
JonesM, 2001, “The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power?”Environment and Planning A331185–1211
60.
JonesV, 1974, “Statement by Victor Jones”, in Hearings on Substate Regionalism: Substate Regionalism and the Federal System IVAdvisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DC
61.
KeithN, 1973Politics and the Housing Crisis since 1930 (Universe Books, New York)
62.
KincaidJColeRParkinA, 2002, “Public opinion on federalism in the United States and Canada in 2002: the aftermath of terrorism”Publius32123–151
63.
LathropW, 1971, “The San Francisco freeway revolt”Transportation Engineering Journal97133–144
64.
LefevreC, 1998, “Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research229–25
65.
LongN, 1974, “Regionalism toward the year 2000”, in The Regionalist Papers Ed. MathewsonKMetropolitan Fund, 211 West Fort Street, Detroit, MI 48226, pp 259–271
66.
LopezRHynesH, 2003, “Sprawl in the 1990s: measurement distribution and trends”Urban Affairs Review38325–355
67.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379–395
68.
MacDonaldA, 1928Federal Aid to the StatesNational Civic League, 1445 Market Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202
69.
McDonnellT, 1957The Wagner Housing Act: A Case Study of the Legislative Process (Loyola University Press, Chicago, IL)
70.
MacLeodG, 2001, “The new regionalism reconsidered: globalization regulation and the recasting of political economic space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25804–829
71.
MarglinSSchorJ, 1990The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
72.
MartinR, 1965The Cities and the Federal System (Atherton Press, New York)
73.
MathewsonK (Ed.), 1974The Regionalist PapersThe Metropolitan Fund, 211 West Fort Street, Detroit, MI 48226
74.
Mitchell-WeaverCMillerDDealR, 2000, “Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA”Urban Studies37851–876
75.
MollenkopfJ, 1983The Contested City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
76.
MoranM, 1991The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution: The USA, UK and Japan (St Martin's Press, New York)
77.
MorganDMareschalP, 1999, “Central-city/suburban inequality and metropolitan political fragmentation”Urban Affairs Review34578–595
78.
NorrisD, 2001, “Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: economic imperatives versus political impediments”Journal of Urban Affairs23557–571
79.
OrfieldM, 1997Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
80.
OsborneD, 1990Laboratories of Democracy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
81.
PeirceNJohnsonCHallS, 1993Citistates: How Urban American Can Prosper in a Competitive World (Seven Locks Press, Washington, DC)
82.
PetersonP, 1995The Price of Federalism (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
83.
PioreMSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide (Basic Books, New York)
RuskD, 1995Cities without Suburbs (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
86.
SassenS, 1991The Global City: New York London Tokyo (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
87.
SavitchHVogelR, 1996Regional Politics: America in a Post-city Age (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
88.
SavitchHVogelR, 2004, “Suburbs without a city: power and city-county consolidation”Urban Affairs Review39758–790
89.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
90.
SayerD, 1987The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
91.
SchlesingerA, 1958The Age of Roosevelt: The Coming of the New Deal (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
92.
ScottA, 1998Regions and the World Economy (Oxford University Press, New York)
93.
ScottA, 2001, “Globalization and the rise of city regions”European Planning Studies9813–826
94.
ScottM, 1969American City Planning Since 1890 (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
95.
SE, 1958, “Editorial”Street Engineering8 (December) 7
96.
SeelyB, 1987Building the American Highway System: Engineers as Policy Makers (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
97.
SkowronekS, 1982Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920 (Cambridge University Press, New York)
98.
SmithR, 1964Public Authorities Special Districts and Local GovernmentNational Association of Counties Research Foundation, 1735 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC
99.
StephensGWikstromN, 2000Metropolitan Government and Governance: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Analysis and the Future (Oxford University Press, New York)
100.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York)
101.
SwanstromT, 2001, “What we argue about when we argue about regionalism”Journal of Urban Affairs23479–496
102.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76
103.
TeafordJ, 2002The Rise of the States: Evolution of American State Government (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
104.
The Philadelphia Inquirer“Promises unfulfilled: fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, our region's schools still struggle for integration and equality”, 16 May, page 5
105.
TieboutC, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
106.
TömmelI, 1997, “The EU and the regions: towards a three-tier system or new modes of regulation?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy15413–436
107.
TregoningHAgyemanJShenotC, 2002, “Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability”Local Environment7341–347
108.
USCM, 1994, “The federal budget and the cities”, United States Conference of Mayors, 1620 Eye Street, Washington, DC 20006
109.
WalkerD, 1995The Rebirth of Federalism: Slouching Toward Washington (Chatham House, Chatham, NJ)
110.
WallisA, 1994, “Inventing regionalism: the first two waves”National Civic Review83159–176
111.
WallisA, 1994, “Inventing regionalism: a two-phase approach”National Civic Review83447–469
112.
WattsR, 1999, Comparing Federal Systems (Queens University, Kingston, ON)
