This paper examines how the geography of UK international trade has changed since the United Kingdom's accession to the European Economic Community, using a newly constructed dataset that gives a detailed breakdown of the United Kingdom's imports and exports by both port of entry and exit and commodity. Our results suggest that between 1970 and 1992 overall imports and exports reorientated in favour of ports located nearer to the continent. The vast majority of individual commodities also saw a similar reorientation. Our results point to an important role for market access in determining the geography of UK trade.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinRForslidRMartinPOttavianoG MRobert-NicouldF, 2003Economic Geography and Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
2.
BeggDBlanchardOCoyleDFrankelJGiavazziFPortesRSeabrightPVenablesAWintersL AWyploszC, 2003The Consequences of Saying No: An Independent Report into the Economic Consequences of the UK Saying No to the EuroBritain in Europe, London, http://www.britainineurope.org.uk/.
3.
BehrensKLamorgeseA ROttavianoG MTabuchiT, 2004, “Testing the home market effect in a multi-country world: the theory”, DP 4468, Centre for Economic Policy Research, http://www.cepr.org/pubs/new-dps/dplist.asp?dpno=4468.
4.
BröckerJPeschelK, 1988, “Trade”, in Regional Impact of Community Policies in Europe Eds MolleWCappelinR (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants).
5.
ChisholmM, 1992, “Britain, the European Community, and the centralisation of production: Theory and evidence, freight movements”Environment and Planning A24551–570.
6.
ChisholmM, 1995Britain on the Edge of Europe (Routledge, London).
7.
FujitaMThisseJ, 2002Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location and Regional Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
HarrisC, 1954, “The market as a factor on the localization of industry in the United States”Annals of the Association of the American Geographers64315–348.
10.
HeadKMayerT, 2004, “The empirics of agglomeration and trade”, in The Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Volume 4 Eds ThisseJHendersonV (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 2609–2669.
11.
HirschmanA O, 1958The Strategy of Development (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
12.
HoareA G, 1977, “The geography of British exports”Environment and Planning A9121–136.
13.
HoareA G, 1985, “Great Britain and her exports: An exploratory regional analysis”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie769–21.
14.
HoareA G, 1986, “British ports and their export hinterlands: A Rapidly changing geography”Geografiska Analler B6829–40.
15.
HoareA G, 1988, “Geographical aspects of British overseas trade: A Framework and a review”Environment and Planning A201345–1364.
16.
LimaoNVenablesA J, 2001, “Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade”World Bank Economic Review15451–479.
17.
MolinariAWintersL A, 2003, “UK international trade by port and commodity”, Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
18.
MonetaC, 1959, “The estimation of transport costs in international trade”Journal of Political Economy6741–58.
19.
MyrdalG, 1957Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (Duckworth, London).
20.
NearyJ P, 2001, “Of hype and hyperbolas: Introducing the new economic geography”Journal of Economic Literature39536–561.
21.
OvermanH GWintersL A, 2003, “Trade shocks and industrial location: the impact of EEC accession on the UK”, DP 588, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.
22.
WintersL A, 1984, “British imports of manufactures and the Common Market”Oxford Economic Papers36(1) 103–118.
