A major challenge for any decentralizing regime is to develop more inclusive and participatory decisionmaking processes and to be responsive to conflicting demands from diverse constituencies while maintaining its governing capacity. Using Taiwan's experience in managing groundwater overextraction and land subsidence in its coastal areas, in this paper we demonstrate how democratization at its early stages may create added difficulties for the political system to face when trying to solve environmental problems. Yet in the long run, democratization may lead to an increase in participative and integrative governing capacities, bringing about more effective and equitable solutions to complex environmental problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgranoffRMcGuireM, 2001, “Big questions in public network management research”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11295–326
2.
AgrawalAGibsonCC, 2001Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-based Conservation (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
3.
BakerSBaumgartlB, 1998, “Bulgaria: Managing the environment in an unstable transition”Environmental Politics7183–206
4.
BellowsTJ, 2000, “Taiwan and Singapore: Political development and democratization”American Asian Review18119–139
5.
BlomquistW, 1992Dividing the Water: Governing Groundwater in Southern California (ICS Press, San Francisco, CA)
CherpA, 2001, “Environmental assessment in countries in transition: Evolution in a changing context”Journal of Environmental Management62357–374
11.
CongletonRD, 1996, “Political institutions and pollution control”, in The Political Economy of Environmental Protection: Analysis and Evidence Ed. CongletonRD (Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 273–289
Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, 2002Zhonghuaminguo Taiwan diqu jiating shouzhi diaocha baogao [The survey report on family income and expenditure in the Taiwan area of the Republic of China] (The Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan) (in Chinese)
15.
DryzekJS, 1996, “Strategies of ecological democratization”, in Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects Eds LaffertyWMMeadowcroftJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 108–123
16.
FeenyDHannaSMcEvoryAF, 1996, “Questioning the assumptions of the ‘tragedy of the commons’ model of fisheries”Land Economics72187–205
17.
FiorinoDJ, 1996, “Environmental policy and the participation gap”, in Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects Eds LaffertyWMMeadowcroftJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 194–212
GibsonCCMcKeanMAOstromE, 2000People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
GrugelJ, 2002Democratization: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave, New York)
21.
HardinG, 1968, “The tragedy of the commons”Science1621243–1248
22.
HsuH-KLiuF-HChengC-C, 1995, “Taiwan diqu dicing xiaxian zhi xiankuang: Chengyin yu duce” [The present conditions of land subsidence in Taiwan: Causes and countermeasures] Taiwan Water Conservation4319–29
23.
HuntingtonS, 1991The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK)
24.
JanickeM, 1996, “Democracy as a condition for environmental policy success: The importance of non-institutional factors”, in Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects Eds LaffertyWMMeadowcroftJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 71–85
LimJ-HTangS-Y, 2002, “Democratization and environmental policy making in Korea”Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions15561–582
27.
LinC-C, 1998Shui de zhengzhixue [The politics of water] (China Times Cultural Publisher, Taipei) (in Chinese)
28.
LuH-H, 2004, “Diceng xiaxian fangzhi gunzuo zhi xiankuang yu zhanwang” [The state and prospects of land subsidence prevention], paper presented at Di liu jie dixiashui ziyuan ji shuizhi baohu yantaohui [The 6th conference on groundwater resources and water quality protection], Taichung, Taiwan (in Chinese); copy available from Mr H-H Lu, Section Chief, Water Resources Agency, MOEA, 501 Section 2 Liming Road, Taichung, Taiwan 407, Republic of China
29.
LuY-M, 2001, “Yunxian jihua jinnian shieryue yiqian you xian fengtian yibai kou yangzhiqu huangdi ji feiqi shuijing” [Yunlin County Plans to seal 100 abandoned groundwater pumps by the end of December in this year] United Daily 28 March (in Chinese)
30.
MyersRChaoL, 1998The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
31.
OstromE, 1990Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
32.
PayneR, 1995, “Freedom and the environment”Journal of Democracy641–55
33.
RiggerS, 2001From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party (Lynne, Boulder, CO)
34.
SilvaE, 1996, “Democracy, market economics, and environmental policy in Chile”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs381–33
35.
SuleimanE, 1999, “Bureaucracy and democratic consolidation: Lessons from Eastern Europe”Transition to Democracy Ed. AndersonL (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 141–167
36.
TanQ, 2000, “Democratization and bureaucratic restructuring in Taiwan”Studies in Comparative International Development3548–64
37.
TangC-P, 2003, “Democratizing urban politics and civic environmentalism in Taiwan”China Quarterly1761029–1051
38.
TangC-PTangS-Y, 2000, “Democratizing bureaucracy: The political economy of environmental impact assessment and air pollution fees in Taiwan”Comparative Politics3381–99
39.
TangC-PTangS-Y, 2002, “Taiwan”, in Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries Eds WeidnerHJanickeM (Springer, Berlin) pp 375–392
40.
TangS-YTangC-PLoCW-H, 2005, “Public participation and environmental impact assessment in mainland China and Taiwan: Political foundations of environmental management”The Journal of Development Studies411–32
41.
TienH-MChuY-H, 1996, “Building democracy in Taiwan”China Quarterly1481141–1170
