The 1990s was the decade of neoliberalism in Brazil. During the successive administrations of President Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995–2003), public enterprises were privatized, import tariffs were slashed, regional free-trade markets were established, and fiscal discipline was prioritized in an attempt to control a massive public debt. As his first term progressed, however, Cardoso was forced to respond to the insistent popular demand for reform of the country's inequitable land-tenure structure. The issue became increasingly visible in the 1990s because of the strength of a grassroots social movement, the Movement of Landless Workers (MST). In response to the demands for agrarian reform, the government offered its support for an essentially neoliberal, market-based alternative to state-led distribution—an alternative favored by official development organizations throughout the Third World at this time. In this paper, I argue that the support for a market-led agrarian reform privileged the agrarian elite in Brazil and delegitimated the MST's struggle, not only because it reinforced the elite's claim to land but also because it legitimated the elite's particular interpretation of productivity and property rights. The claims put forward both by the agrarian elite and by the MST members in the southern state of Santa Catarina derive from what can usefully be considered ‘agrarian moral economies’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlimondaH, 2000, “Brazilian society and regional integration”Latin American Perspectives27(6) 27–44.
2.
AlstonLLibecapG DMuellerB, 1999Titles, Conflict and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).
3.
AmmanEBaerW, 2000, “The illusion of stability: The Brazilian economy under Cardoso”World Development281805–1819.
4.
AvritzerL, 2002Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
5.
BakerA, 2002, “Reformas liberalizantes e aprovação dos debates da política econômica no Brasil” [Free-market reform and presidential approval: The politicization of economic policy debates in Brazil]Dados4577–98.
6.
BarhamBCarterM, 1996, “Level playing fields and laissez faire: Postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies”World Development241133–1149.
7.
BoothW, 1994, “On the idea of the moral economy”American Political Science Review88653–667.
8.
BorrasS MJr, 2003, “Questioning market-led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa”Journal of Agrarian Change3367–394.
9.
BrannstronC, 2001, “Producing possession: Labour, law and land on a Brazilian agricultural frontier, 1920–1945”Political Geography20859–883.
10.
Bresser PereiraL C, 1996Economic Crisis and State Reform in Brazil: Toward a New Interpretation of Latin America (Lynne Reiner, Boulder, CO).
CardosoF HFalettoE, 1978Dependency and Development in Latin America (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
15.
DagninoE, 1998, “Culture, citizenship, and democracy: Changing discourses and practices of the Latin American left”, in Cultures of Politics/Politics of Culture: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements Eds AlvarezS EDagninoEEscobarA (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 33–64.
16.
DagninoE, 2002, “Sociedade Civil e Espaços Publicos no Brasil” [Civil society and public spaces in Brazil], in Sociedade Civil e Espaços Publicos no Brasil Ed. DagninoE (Editora Paz e Terra S/A, São Paulo) pp 9–17.
17.
da VeigaJ E, 1990A reforma que virou suco: uma introdução ao dilema agrário no Brasil [The reform that turned sour: an introduction to the agrarian dilemma in Brazil] (Vozes, Petrópolis).
18.
de AlmeidaL FSanchezF R, 2000, “The landless workers' movement and social struggles against noeliberalism”Latin American Perspectives27(5) 11–32.
19.
DeiningerK, 2001, “Negotiated land reform as one way of land access: Experiences from Colombia, Brazil and South Africa”, in Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action Eds de JanvryAGordilloGPlatteauJ-PSadouletE (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 315–349.
20.
DeiningerKBinswangerH, 2001, “The evolution of the World Bank's land policy”, in Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action Eds de JanvryAGordilloGSadouletEPlatteauJ P (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 406–441.
21.
de JanvryA, 1981The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
22.
de JanvryASadouletEWolfordW, 2001, “The changing role of the state in Latin America land reforms”, in Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action Eds de JanvryAGordilloGPlatteauJSadouletE (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 279–304.
23.
de OnisJ, 2000, “Brazil new capitalism”Foreign Affairs79(3) 15–25.
24.
EvansP, 1979Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
25.
FernandesB M, 1999MST, Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem-Terra: Formação e Territorialização [MST, Movement of Rural Landless Workers: formation and territorialization] (Editora Hucitec, São Paulo).
26.
FormanS, 1975The Brazilian Peasantry (Columbia University Press, New York).
27.
GoertzelT G, 1999Fernando Henrique Cardoso: Reinventing Democracy in Brazil (Lynne Reiner, Boulder, CO).
28.
GohnM d G, 1997Os Sem Terra, ONGs e Cidadania [The landless, NGOs and citizenship] (Cortez, São Paulo).
29.
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci edited and translated by HoareQ and SmithG Nowell (Lawrence and Wishart, London).
30.
Graziano da SilvaJ F, 1982A Modernização Dolorosa: Estrutura Agrária, Fronteira Agrícola e Trabalhadores Rurais no Brasil [Painful modernization: agrarian structure, agriculture frontier and rural workers in Brazil] (Zahar Editores, Rio De Janeiro).
31.
GreenJ N, 2000, “Introduction”Latin American Perspectives in a special issue on Brazil in the aftershock of Neoliberalism 27(6) 5–8.
32.
GrindleM, 1986State and Countryside: Development Policy and Agrarian Politics in Latin America (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
33.
GuimarãesA, 1981Quatro Seculos de Latifundio [Four centuries of latifundia] 5th edition (Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro).
34.
HabermasJ, 1981, “New social movements”Telos4933–37.
35.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1 (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).
36.
HallA L, 1990, “Land tenure and land reform in Brazil”, in Agrarian Reform and Grassroots Development: Ten Case Studies Eds ProstermanRTempleMHanstadT (Lynne Reiner Publishers, Boulder, CO) pp 210–243.
37.
HammondJ, 1999, “Law and disorder: The Brazilian landless farmworkers’ movement”Bulletin of Latin American Research18469–489.
38.
HechtSCockburnA, 1989The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon (Verso, London).
39.
HolstonJ, 1991, “The misrule of law: Land and usurpation in Brazil”Comparative Studies in Society and History33695–725.
40.
KarlT L, 2003, “The vicious cycle of inequality in Latin America”, in What Justice? Whose Justice? Fighting for Fairness in Latin America Eds EcksteinS EWickham-CrowleyT P (University of California at Berkeley Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 133–157.
41.
LewisA, 1954, “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour”Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies22139–191.
42.
McCarthyJ P, 1998, “The good, the bad, and the ugly: Environmentalism, wise use, and the nature of accumulation in the rural West”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 126–150.
43.
MallonF, 1995Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
44.
MartinsJSD, 1975Capitalismo e Tradicionalismo [Capitalism and traditionalism] (Livraria Pionieira Editora, São Paulo).
45.
MartinsM D, 2000, “The MST challenge to neoliberalism”Latin American Perspectives27(5) 33–45.
46.
Maybury-LewisB, 1994The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964–1985 (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
47.
MDA, 1999The Land Bank English translation of the original document O Banco da TerraMinistériodo Desenvolvimento Agrária, Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária, Brasília.
48.
MedeirosL, 1998, “Os trabalhadores rurais na política: O Papel da imprensa partidária na çãio de uma linguagem de classe” [The role of private media in the decline of a language of class], in Política e Reforma Agrária Eds CostaLFCSantosR (Mauad, Rio de Janeiro) pp 41–58.
49.
MiorL C, 1992, “Empresas agroalimentares, produção agrária familiar e competividade no complexo carne de Santa Catarina” [Agrofood companies, family production and competitiveness in the meat industry in Santa Catarina], master's thesis, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade, Rio de Janeiro.
50.
MüllerG, 1985A dinâmica da agricultura paulista [The dynamic of São Paulo agriculture] Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados, São Paulo.
51.
NavarroZ, 1999, “The ‘Cedula da Terra'guiding project—comments on the social and political–institutional conditions of its recent development”, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
52.
NovaesR, 1998, “A trajectória de uma bandeira de luta” [The trajectory of a banner of struggle], in Política e Reforma Agrária Eds CostaLFCSantosR (Mauad, Rio de Janeiro) pp 169–181.
53.
NylenW R, 1993, “Selling neoliberalism: Brazil's instituto liberal”Journal of Latin American Studies25301–311.
54.
OliveiraP C ddel CampoC P, 1985A propriedade privada e a livre iniciativa no tufão agro-reformista [Private property and free will in the agro-reformist terrain] (Editora Vera Cruz Ltda, São Paulo, SP).
55.
OndettiG, 2001, “When repression backfires: the rise of the Brazilian landless movement in the mid-1990s”, paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association meetings in Washington, DC; copy available from the author, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
56.
PauliloM, 1996Terra a Vista … e ao Longe (Editora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC).
57.
PauliloM, 2003, “Movimento de Mulheres Agricultoras: Terra e Matrimônio” [Movement of women farmers: Land and marriage], in Agricultura e Espaço Rural em Santa Catarina Eds PauliloMSchmidtW (Editora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC).
58.
PauliloMISSchmidtW (Eds), 2003Agricultura e espaço rural em Santa Catarina [Agriculture and rural space in Santa Catarina] (Editora da UFSC, Florianópolis, SC).
59.
PayneL A, 2000Uncivil Movements: The Armed Right Wing and Democracy in Latin America (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
60.
PereiraA W, 1997The End of the Peasantry: The Rural Labor Movement in Northeast Brazil, 1961–1988 (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
61.
PereiraA W, 2003, “Brazil's agrarian reform: Democratic innovation or oligarchic exclusion redux?”Latin American Politics and Society45(2) 41–65.
62.
PowerT, 1998, “Brazilian politicians and neoliberalism: Mapping support for the Cardoso reforms, 1995–1997”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs40(4) 51–72.
63.
PradoCJr, 1967The Colonial Background of Modern Brazil (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
64.
RangelI, 1956, “Iniciativa pública e privada” [Public and private initiative]Econômica Brasileira2(3) 33–140.
65.
ReisE P, 1990, “Brazil—100 years of the agrarian question”International Social Science Journal42153–168.
66.
SantosRCostaLFC, 1998, “Camponeses e política no pré-64” [Peasants and politics pre-64], in Política e Reforma Agrária Eds CostaLFCSantosR (Mauad, Rio de Janeiro) pp 13–41.
67.
SayerA, 2004, “Two accounts of capitalism and moral economy”, paper presented to the Political Studies Association Meeting, 7 April, www.psa.ac.uk/cps/2004/Sayer.pdf.
68.
ScottJ, 1976The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
69.
SeligmannR, 1998PROCERA: Programa Especial de Credito para Reforma Agrária [PROCERA: Special Credit Program for Agrarian Reform], Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária, Brasilia, DF.
70.
SherriffR, 2001Dreaming Equality: Color, Race, and Racism in Urban Brazil (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).
71.
SkidmoreT E, 2004, “Brazil's persistent income inequality: Lessons from history”Latin American Politics and Society46(2) 135–153.
72.
SonntagH R, 2002, “Toward the core of the world system? Social change in Brazil”The Brown Journal of World Affairs8(1) 83–96.
73.
SorjB, 1998, “A reforma agrária em tempos de democracia e globalização” [Agrarian reform in times of democracy and globalization]Novos Estudos5023–40.
74.
SwidlerA, 1986, “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies”American Sociological Review51273–286.
75.
TestaV MNadalR DMiorL CBaldisseraI TCortinaNWilkinsonJ, 1996O Desenvolvimento Sustentavel do Oeste Catarinese [Sustainable development in Western Santa Catarina] (EPAGRI, Florianopólis, SC).
76.
The Economist1998, “Brazil's steady nerve”, 10 October, pages 6–10.
77.
ThiesenhusenW C, 1995Broken Promises: Agrarian Reform and the Latin American Campesino (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
78.
ThiesenhusenW, 1996, “Trends in land tenure issues in Latin America: Experiences and recommendations for development cooperation”Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeithttp://www.mekonginfo.org/mrc/html/thiesenh/thi_inh.htm.
79.
ThompsonE P, 1971, “The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century”Past and Present5076–136.
80.
ThompsonE P, 1993Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture (New Press, New York).
81.
Viotti da CostaE, 2000The Brazilian Empire: Myths and Histories, Revised Edition (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).
82.
WattsM J, 1983Silent Violence: Food, Famine and Peasantry in Northern Nigeria (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
83.
WeylandK G, 1996Democracy Without Equality: Failures of Reform in Brazil (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
84.
WolfordW, 2003a, “Families, fields, and fighting for land: The spatial dynamics of contention in rural Brazil”Mobilization: An International Journal8(2) 157–173.
85.
WolfordW, 2003b, “Producing community: The MST and land reform settlements in Brazil”Journal of Agrarian Change3500–520.
86.
WolfordW, 2004, “Of land and labor: Agrarian reform on the sugarcane plantations in northeast Brazil”Latin American Perspectives31147–170.
87.
WrightA, 2001, “The origins of the Brazilian movement of landless rural workers”, paper prepared for presentation at the meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, 6–8 September, Washington, DC; copy available from the author, Environmental Studies, State University of California, Sacramento, CA.
88.
WrightAWolfordW, 2003To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil (Food First Publications, Oakland, CA).
