Studies of economic transformation under socialism in general, and the growth and development of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in particular, have been based on the assumption that SOEs are a homogeneous entity. With few exceptions, the extant literature tends to compare SOEs as a whole with other economic sectors. Little has been written about the heterogeneous nature of SOEs. The author examines the internal variation of SOEs at different administrative levels in terms of productivity and profitability in China, which remains one of the largest socialist economies undergoing profound structural changes. The performance of SOEs is found to have varied significantly among the administrative hierarchy of the socialist political system. The changing politics of scale from promoting regional self-reliance in the Maoist era toward both expanding SOE autonomy and fiscal decentralization in the post-Maoist era, has resulted in an increase in the disparity between the SOEs affiliated with the national government and those affiliated with local governments. The investigation of SOEs in the Chinese context raises important theoretical questions concerning the growth dynamics of SOEs and suggests the need for a more careful and path-dependent treatment of socialist economies under reform. The growth of SOEs in transitional socialist economies provides an interesting testing ground in which to evaluate the theoretical discourse concerning the politics of scale and the rescaling of politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1997, “The dramaturgy of horizons: Geographical scale in the ‘reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995”Political Geography1699–121.
2.
AndruszGHarloeMSzelenyiI, 1996Cities After Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies (Blackwell, Oxford).
3.
BrennerN, 1997, “State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: Urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960–1990”Political Geography16273–306.
4.
BrennerN, 1999, “Beyond state-centrism: Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies”Theory and Society2839–78.
5.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614.
6.
CaoY ZQianY YWeingastB R, 1999, “From federalism, Chinese style to privatization, Chinese style”Economics of Transition7103–131.
7.
ChengY SLoD, 2002, “Explaining the financial performance of China's industrial enterprises: Beyond the competition–ownership controversy”The China Quarterly number 170, 413–440.
8.
CSSB, China State Statistical Bureau (China Statistical Press, Beijing) 1994Zhongguo Gongye Jingji Tongji Nianjian 1994 [China industrial economic yearbook, 1994].
9.
CSSB, China State Statistical Bureau (China Statistical Press, Beijing) 1996Zhongguo Tongji Nianjian [China statistical yearbook].
10.
CSSB, China State Statistical Bureau (China Statistical Press, Beijing) 1997Zhongguo Guding Zichan Touzi Tongji Nianjian (1950–1995) [China statistical yearbook on investment in fixed assets, 1950–1995].
11.
CSSB, China State Statistical Bureau (China Statistical Press, Beijing) 1998Zhongguo Gongye Jingji Tongji Nianjian (1998) [China industrial economic yearbook 1998].
12.
CSSB, China State Statistical Bureau (China Statistical Press, Beijing) 1999Xinzhongguo Wushinian Tongji Ziliao Huibian [Comprehensive Statistical Data and Materials on 50 Years of New China].
13.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political production of scale”Political Geography1693–97.
FanGWooW T, 1996, “State enterprise reform as a source of macroeconomic instability”Asian Economic Journal10207–224.
16.
FieldR M, 1992, “China's industrial performance since 1978”The China Quarterly number 130, 577–607.
17.
GuE X, 2001, “Beyond the property rights approach: Welfare policy and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China”Development and Change32129–150.
18.
HanS SPannellC, 1999, “The geography of privatization in China, 1978–1996”Economic Geography75272–296.
19.
HerodA, 1997, “Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–89”Political Geography16145–169.
20.
JonasA, 1994, “Editorial”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–264.
21.
JonesK T, 1998, “Scales as epistemology”Political Geography1725–28.
22.
KornaiJ, 1980Economics of Shortage (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
23.
KornaiJ, 1986, “The soft budget constraint”Kyklos393–30.
24.
KornaiJ, 1992The Socialist System (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
LOIC, 1989Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Gongye Pucha Ziliao (1985) [Abstract of industrial census materials of PRC in 1985] Leading Office of Industrial Census (China Publishing House, Beijing).
30.
LOIC, 1997Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Disanci Quanguo Gongye Pucha Ziliao Huibian (1995) [The data of the third national industrial census of the People's Republic of China in 1995] Leading Office of Industrial Census (China Statistical Press, Beijing).
31.
MaLJC, 2002, “Economic transition at the local level: Diverse forms of town development in China”Eurasian Geography and Economics4379–103.
32.
MaLJCWeiY H, 1997, “Determinants of state investment in China, 1953–1990”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie88211–225.
33.
MarstonS A, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242.
NaughtonB, 1988, “The third front: Defense industrialization in the Chinese interior”China Quarterly115351–386.
37.
NaughtonB, 1994, “What is distinctive about China's economic transition? State enterprise reform and overall system transformation”Journal of Contemporary Economics18470–490.
38.
NaughtonB, 1995Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978–1993 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
39.
NeeV, 1992, “Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China”Administrative Science Quarterly371–27.
40.
NeeVStarkD, 1989Remaking the Economic Institutions of Socialism: China and Eastern Europe (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
41.
ParkB G, 2003, “Politics of scale and the globalization of the South Korean automobile industry”Economic Geography79173–194.
42.
PeckJ, 2002, “Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare”Economic Geography78331–360.
43.
PengM, 1989Dangdai zhongguo de jiben jianshe [Capital construction in contemporary China] (China Social Science Press, Beijing).
44.
PutnamR D, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
45.
QianY YRolandG, 1996, “The soft budget constraint in China”Japan and the World Economy8207–223.
46.
QianY YXuC G, 1993, “Why China's economic reforms differ: The M-form hierarchy and entry/expansion of the non-state sector”Economics of Transition1135–170.
47.
RiskinC, 1987China's Political Economy: The Quest for Development since 1949 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
SheppardE, 2002, ‘The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality”Economic Geography78307–330.
50.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
51.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference and the politics of scale”, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (Macmillan, London) pp 57–79.
52.
StarkD, 1990, ‘Privatization in Hungary: From plan to clan?”East European Politics and Societies4351–392.
53.
StarkD, 1992, “Path dependence and privatization strategies in East Central Europe”East European Politics and Societies617–54.
54.
StarkD, 1996, “Recombinant property in Eastern European capitalism”American Journal of Sociology101993–1027.
55.
SteinfeldE, 1998Forging Reform in China: The Fate of State-owned Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
56.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: Glocalization and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Eds CoxK R (Guilford, New York) pp 137–177.
57.
WalderA G, 1995a, “China's transitional economy: Interpreting its significance”The China Quarterly number 144, 963–979.
58.
WalderA G, 1995b, “Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China's transitional economy”American Journal of Sociology101263–301.
59.
WeiY H, 2000Regional Development in China: States, Globalization, and Inequality (Routledge, London).
60.
WongCPW, 1985, “Material allocation and decentralization: Impact of the local sector on industrial reform”, in The Political Economy of Reform in Post-Mao China Eds PerryE JWongC (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
61.
WongCPW, 1992, “Fiscal reform and local industrialization: The problematic sequencing of reform in post-Mao China”Modern China18197–227.
62.
WooW THaiWJinY BFanG, 1994, ‘How successful has Chinese enterprise reform been? Pitfalls in opposite biases and focuses”Journal of Comparative Economics18410–437.
63.
ZhangW Y, 1997, “Decision rights, residual claim and performance: A Theory of how the Chinese state enterprise reform works”China Economic Review867–82.
64.
ZhouT H, 1984Dangdai zhongguo de jingji tizhi gaige [Economic system reform in contemporary China] (China Social Science Press, Beijing).
