The author examines the development of the notion of the field experiment in High Arctic environmental sciences during the period 1958–70. After a discussion of the philosophy and sociology of experiment, the author considers a set of field practices conducted under the auspices of the Canadian Government's Polar Continental Shelf Project. Drawing on archival and oral historical research, he argues that field scientists had to deal with a number of logistical, corporeal, and epistemic difficulties in the High Arctic. It is demonstrated that these obstacles hindered attempts to develop a scientific literature based upon experimental practices during fieldwork. In doing so, the author attempts to set new agendas for historical geographers of science around the analysis of the geographical sciences, whilst also contributing to discussions about the epistemic status of variegated field practices.
References
1.
AhnertF, 1980, “A note on measurements and experiments in geomorphology”Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Supplementband151–10
2.
BarnesT J, 1996Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space (Guilford Press, New York)
3.
BarnesT J, 2001, “Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the ‘cultural turn’”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91546–565
4.
BerryM JBarrK G, 1971, “A seismic refraction profile across the polar continental shelf of the Queen Elizabeth Islands”Canadian Journal of Earth Science8347–370
5.
BloomL, 1993Gender on Ice: American Ideologies of Polar Exploration (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
6.
BravoMSörlinS, 2002, “Preface”, in Narrating the Arctic: A Cultural History of Nordic Scientific Practices Eds BravoMSörlinS (Science History Publications, Canton, MA) pp vii–ix
7.
BurnettD G, 2000Masters of All They Surveyed: Exploration, Geography and a British El Dorado (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
8.
ChurchM, 1984, “On experimental method in geomorphology”, in Catchment Experiments in Geomorphology Eds BurtT PWallingD E (Geo Books, Norwich) pp 563–580
9.
ChurchMMarkD M, 1980, “On size and scale in geomorphology”Progress in Physical Geography4342–390
10.
ChurchMSlaymakerO, 1985, “Preface”, in Field and Theory: Lectures in Geocryology Eds ChurchMSlaymakerO (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver), page xi
11.
ChurchMGomezBHickinE JSlaymakerO, 1985, “Geomorphological sociology”Earth Surface Processes and Landforms10539–540
12.
CollierPInkpenR, 2002, “The RGS, exploration and empire and the contested nature of surveying”Area34273–283
13.
CollinsH, 1992Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice2nd edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
14.
CollisC, 1996, “The voyage of the episteme: narrating the north”Essays on Canadian Writing5926–45
15.
CoxD R, 1958Planning of Experiments (John Wiley, New York)
16.
CraibR B, 2004Cartographic Mexico: A History of State Formations and Fugitive Landscapes (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
17.
CrangM, 1998, “Places of practice, and the practice of science”Environment and Planning A301971–1974
18.
DoddsK, 1997, “Antarctica and the modern geographical imagination (1918–1960)”Polar Record33(184)47–62
19.
DoddsK, 2000, “Putting maps in their place: the demise of the Falkland Islands Dependency Survey and the mapping of Antarctica, 1945–1962”Ecumene7176–210
20.
DoddsK, 2002Pink Ice: Britain and the South Atlantic Empire (I B Tauris, London)
21.
EdneyM H, 1997Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
22.
Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 1986Islands in the Midnight Sun: The Story of the Polar Continental Shelf Project (programme transcript), Carleton Productions, Toronto
23.
FisherR A, 1960The Design of Experiments7th edition (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh)
24.
FosterMMarinoC, 1986The Polar Shelf: The Saga of Canada's Arctic Scientists (NC Press, Toronto)
25.
GoodingDPinchTSchafferS, 1989a, “Introduction: some uses of experiment”, in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences Eds GoodingDPinchTSchafferS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–27
26.
GoodingDPinchTSchafferS, 1989b, “Preface”, in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences Eds GoodingDPinchTSchafferS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp xiii–xvii
27.
GraceS E, 2001Canada and the Idea of the North (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston)
28.
GreeneM T, 1985, “History of geology”Osiris (2nd series) 197–116
29.
GreeneM T, 1989, “Afterword”, in From Hutton to Hack Ed. TinklerK J (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 325–331
30.
GreeneM T, 1997, “What cannot be said in science?”Nature388 (14 August) 619–620
31.
GregoryD, 1978Ideology, Science and Human Geography (Hutchinson, London)
HackingI, 1983Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
34.
HarreR, 1981Great Scientific Experiments: Twenty Experiments that Changed the World (Phaidon, Oxford)
35.
HarveyD, 1969Explanation in Geography (Edward Arnold, Sevenoaks, Kent)
36.
HenkeC R, 2000, “Making a place for science: the field trial”Social Studies of Science30483–511
37.
HevlyB, 1996, “The heroic science of glacier motion”, in Science in the field Eds KuklickHKohlerR E (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 66–86
38.
HobsonG, 1990, “Polar Continental Shelf Project”, in Canada's Missing Dimension: Science and History in the Canadian Arctic Islands, Volume 1 Ed. HaringtonC R (Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa) pp 9–21
39.
JahnA, 1985, “Experimental observations of periglacial processes in the Arctic”, in Field and Theory: Lectures in Geocryology Eds ChurchMSlaymakerO (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver) pp 17–35
40.
JonesM, 2003The Last Great Quest: Captain Scott's Antarctic Sacrifice (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
41.
KennedyB A, 1977, “A question of scale?”Progress in Physical Geography1154–157
42.
KennedyB A, 1979, “A naughty world”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series4550–558
43.
KennedyB A, 1992, “Hutton to Horton: views of sequence, progression and equilibrium in geomorphology”Geomorphology5231–250
44.
KirschS, 1998, “Experiments in progress: Edward Teller's controversial geographies”Ecumene5267–285
45.
KohlerR E, 2002a, “Labscapes: naturalizing the lab”History of Science40473–501
46.
KohlerR E, 2002bLandscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab–Field Border in Biology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
47.
KohlerR E, 2002c, “Place and practice in field biology”History of Science40189–210
48.
LatourB, 1990, “The force and the reason of experiment”, in Experimental Inquiries: Historical, Philosophical and Social Studies of Experimentation in Science Ed. Le GrandH E (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 49–80
49.
Le GrandH E, 1990, “Is a picture worth a thousand experiments?”, in Experimental Inquiries: Historical, Philosophical and Social Studies of Experimentation in Science Ed. Le GrandH E (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 241–270
50.
LevereT H, 1988, “Vilhjalmur Stefansson, the Continental Shelf, and a new Arctic continent”British Journal for the History of Science21233–247
51.
LivingstoneD N, 2002Science, Space and Hermeneutics, Hettner Lectures 5 (2001)Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
52.
LivingstoneD N, 2003Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
53.
LivingstoneD N, 2005, “Text, talk and testimony: geographical reflections on scientific habits. An afterword”British Journal for the History of Science3893–100
54.
LorimerH, 2003a, “The geographical field course as active archive”Cultural Geographies10278–308
55.
LorimerH, 2003b, “Telling small stories: spaces of knowledge and the practice of geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28197–217
56.
LorimerHSpeddingN, 2005, “Locating field science: a geographical family expedition to Glen Roy, Scotland”British Journal for the History of Science3813–33
57.
MackayJ RBurnC R, 2002, “The first 20 years (1978–1979 to 1998–1999) of ice-wedge growth at the Illisarvik experimental drained lake site, western Arctic coast, Canada”Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences3995–111
58.
MatlessD, 2003, “Original theories: science and the currency of the local”Cultural Geographies10354–378
59.
MatthewsW H, 1985, “On the scientific method of J Ross Mackay”, in Field and Theory: Lectures in Geocryology Eds ChurchMSlaymakerO (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver) pp 1–16
60.
NaylorS, 2002, “The field, the museum and the lecture hall: the spaces of natural history in Victorian Cornwall”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series27494–513
61.
NaylorS, 2005, “Introduction: historical geographies of science—places, contexts, cartographies”British Journal for the History of Science381–12
62.
OldroydD, 1998a, “History of mankind and history of the earth”History of Science36362–364
63.
OldroydD, 1998bSciences of the Earth: Studies in the History of Mineralogy and Geology (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
64.
OldroydD, 1999, “Non-written sources in the study of the history of geology: pros and cons, in the light of the views of Collingwood and Foucault”Annals of Science56395–415
65.
OphirAShapinS, 1991, “The place of knowledge: a methodological survey”Science in Context43–21
66.
OreskesNFlemingJ R, 2000, “Why geophysics?”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics31253–257
67.
PCSP, 1974Islands in the Midnight Sun: The Story of the Polar Continental Shelf Project Polar Continental Shelf Project (Information Canada, Ottawa)
68.
PopperK, 2002aThe Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, London)
69.
PopperK, 2002bThe Poverty of Historicism (Routledge, London)
70.
PowellR C, 2002, “The Sirens' voices? Field practices and dialogue in geography”Area34261–272
71.
PowellR C, 2004Intemperate Spaces: Field Practices and Environmental Science in the Canadian Arctic, 1955–2000 unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography and Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
ReesA, 2001, “Practising infanticide, observing narrative: controversial texts in a field science”Social Studies of Science31507–531
76.
RheinbergerH-J, 1997Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
77.
RichardsK, 1990, “‘Real’ geomorphology”Earth Surface Processes and Landforms15195–197
78.
RichardsK, 1994, “‘Real’ geomorphology revisited”Earth Surface Processes and Landforms19277–281
79.
RiesC, 2002, “Lauge Koch and the mapping of north east Greenland: tradition and modernity in Danish Arctic research, 1920–1940”, in Narrating the Arctic: A Cultural History of Nordic Scientific Practices Eds BravoMSorlinS (Science History Publications, Canton, MA) pp 199–231
80.
RobertsonG, 2000Memoirs of the Very Civil Servant: Mackenzie King to Pierre Trudeau (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
81.
RonellA, 2003a, “The experimental disposition: Nietzsche's discovery of America (or why the present administration sees everything in the form of a test)”American Literary History15560–574
82.
RonellA, 2003b, “Proving grounds: on Nietzsche and the test drive”Modern Language Notes118653–669
83.
RonellA, 2005The Test Drive (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
RootsE F, 1969, “The role of logistics in northern research”, in Proceedings of the Second National Northern Research Conference Ed. BondJ J, Boreal Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, pp 65–77
87.
SchafferS, 1989, “Glass works: Newton's prisms and the uses of experiment”, in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences Eds GoodingDPinchTSchafferS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 67–104
88.
ShapinS, 1991, “‘The mind is its own place’: science and solitude in seventeenth-century England”Science in Context4191–218
89.
ShapinS, 1998, “Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series235–12
90.
ShapinS, 1999, “Rarely pure and never simple: talking about truth”Configurations71–14
91.
ShapinSSchafferS, 1985Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
92.
SieverR, 1997, “Doing earth science research during the cold war”, in The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years Ed. SchiffrinA (New Press, New York) pp 147–170
93.
SimpsonG G, 1963, “Historical science”, in The Fabric of Geology Ed. AlbrittonC C (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) pp 24–48
94.
SlaymakerO, 1980, “Geomorphic field experiments: inventory and prospect”Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Supplementband35183–194
95.
SlaymakerODunneTRappA, 1980, “Geomorphic experiments on hillslopes”Zeitshrift für Geomorphologie Supplementband15v–vii
96.
SmithCAgarJ, 1998, “Introduction: making space for science”, in Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in the Shaping of Knowledge Eds SmithCAgarJ (Macmillan, London) pp 1–23
97.
SmithN, 1994, “Geography, empire and social theory”Progress in Human Geography18491–500
98.
SojaE W, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
99.
SörlinS, 2002, “Rituals and resources of natural history: the North and the Arctic in Swedish scientific nationalism”, in Narrating the Arctic: A Cultural History of Nordic Scientific Practices Eds BravoMSörlinS (Science History Publications, Canton, MA) pp 73–122
100.
WatsonR A, 1966, “Is geology different: a critical discussion of ‘The fabric of geology’”Philosophy of Science33172–185
101.
WithersC W J, 2001Geography, Science and National Identity: Scotland Since 1520 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
102.
YatesF, 1970Experimental Design: Selected Papers of Frank Yates (Charles Griffin, London)
