There remains uncertainty in models of the policy process about how and when radical change takes place. Most policy authors focus on explaining incremental change, and yet in practice a pattern of change described as punctuated equilibrium has been observed, with periods of stability interspersed with periods of rapid, abrupt change. It is argued here that the influence of materials and technologies—the substance of policy—must be incorporated into models of the policy process in order to help further our understanding of radical change. Concepts from science and technology studies concerning the inseparability of social and technical spheres are used to explore how people and materials interact to create opportunities for radical change. These ideas are particularly relevant to policy sectors comprising durable, capital-intensive infrastructure, such as housing. Drawing on examples from the UK housing sector, ideas about policy networks and large technical systems are synthesised to develop a more holistic, interdisciplinary account of policy change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkrichM, 1992, “The de-scription of technical objects”, in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change Eds BijkerW ELawJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 205–224
2.
ArthurW B, 1989, “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events”The Economic Journal99116–131
3.
BallM, 1999, “Chasing a snail: Innovation and housebuilding firms' strategies”Housing Studies149–22
4.
BarkerK, 2003Review of Housing Supply—Securing our Future Housing Needs. Interim Report—Analysis (The Stationery Office, London)
5.
BarlowJ, 1999, “From craft production to mass customisation: Innovation requirements for the United Kingdom housebuilding industry”Housing Studies1423–42
6.
BarlowJ, 2000Private Sector Housebuilding: Structure and Strategies into the 21st CenturyCouncil of Mortgage Lenders, London
7.
BarlowJBhattiM, 1997, “Environmental performance as a competitive strategy? British speculative house builders in the 1990s”Planning Practice and Research1233–44
8.
BarlowJKingA, 1992, “The state, the market, and competitive strategy: The housebuilding industry in the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden”Environment and Planning A24381–400
9.
BaumgartnerF RJonesB D, 1993Agendas and Instability in American Politics (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL)
BerkhoutF, 2002, “Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment”Global Environmental Change121–4
12.
BijkerW EBijsterveldK, 2000, “Women walking through plans: Technology, democracy, and gender identity”Technology and Culture41485–515
13.
Bioregional, 2005, “Zero waste and zero carbon community: Vision for Thames Gateway”, http://www.bioregional.com
14.
BoardmanBDarbySKillipGHinnellsMJardineCPalmerJSindenG, 2005, “40% house”, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford
15.
BRE, 1999Review of Part L of the Building Regulations: Technical Implications of Increased Thermal InsulationBuilding Research Establishment, Glasgow
16.
BRE, 2001, “EcoHomes—the environmental rating for homes”, Building Research Establishment, http://www.bre.co.uk/ecohomes
17.
BRECSU, 1996General Information Report 53: Building a Sustainable Future—Homes for an Autonomous CommunityBuilding Research Energy Conservation Support Unit, Building Research Establishment, Watford, Herts
18.
BRECSU, 2000New Practice Profile 119: The Hockerton Housing Project—Design Lessons for Developers and ClientsBuilding Research Energy Conservation Support Unit, Building Research Establishment, Watford, Herts
19.
BRECSU, 2002General Information Report 89: BedZED—Beddington Zero Energy Development, SuttonBuilding Research Energy Conservation Support Unit, Building Research Establishment, Watford, Herts
20.
Corus Construction Centre, The Steel Construction Institute, British Constructional Steelwork Association, 2003Achieving Sustainable Construction: Guidance for Clients and Their Professional Advisorshttp://scinews.steel-sci.org/Articles/pdf/ASC.pdf
21.
CoutardO, (Ed.) 1999The Governance of Large Technical Systems (Routledge, London)
22.
DavisO ADempsterM A HWildavskyA, 1966, “A theory of the budget process”American Political Science Review60529–547
23.
DEFRA, 2005, “DEFRA press release—UK climate change programme review: Consultation launch”, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairshttp://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2004/041208b.htm
24.
DETR, 2000Climate Change: The UK Programme (The Stationery Office, London)
25.
DryzekJ, 1997The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
26.
DTI, Department for Trade and Industry, London2002, “First stage of major PV demonstration programme launched”New Review May, page 1
27.
2003aOur Energy Future: Creating a Low Carbon Economy Cm 5761 (The Stationery Office, London)
28.
2003b, “Press release: Construction industry must build a greener future”, reference P/2003/244, http://www.gnn.gov.uk/
29.
DTI, ODPM, DEFRA, 2003Better Buildings Summit Issues PaperDepartment for Trade and Industry; Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (The Stationery Office, London)
30.
DTLR, 2002Approved Document LI: The Building Regulations 2000 (Conservation of Fuel and Power in Dwellings)Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
31.
EganJ, 1998Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force (The Stationery Office, London)
32.
ElansP, 2002Social Housing and SustainabilityForum for the Future and The Housing Corporation, London
33.
FawcettT, 2002, “Creative destruction? The role of increased demolition in creating a more sustainable UK housing stock”, paper presented at the Creating Sustainable Urban Environments, The Fifth Symposium of the International Urban Planning and Environment Association, Oxford; copy available from the author, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford
FreemanC, 1994, “The greening of technology”Futures261019–1022
36.
GannD, 2000Building Innovation: Complex Constructs in a Changing World (Thomas Telford, London)
37.
GeelsF W, 2004Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Sociotechnical Analysis (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
38.
GorgolewskiMMilnerMRossK, 2001Off-site Produced Housing: A Briefing Guide for Housing AssociationsBuilding Research Establishment, Watford, Herts
39.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
40.
GrantW, 2000Pressure Groups and British Politics (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
41.
GrantW, 2004, “Pressure politics: The changing world of pressure groups”Parliamentary Affairs57408–419
42.
GrisetP, 1999, “Technical systems and strategy: Intercontinental telecommunications in the first quarter of the twentieth century”, in The Governance of Large Technical Systems Eds CoutardO (Routledge, London) pp 58–72
43.
GrubbM J, 2002, “Britannia waives the rules: The United Kingdom, the European Union and climate change”New Economy9139–142
44.
GuptaJVan der GrijpN, 1999, “Leadership in the climate change regime: The European Union in the looking glass”International Journal of Sustainable Development2303–322
45.
GuyS, 1999, “Evil developers and green fairies”, in Environmental Futures Eds FairweatherN BElworthySStrohMStephensP H G (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 199–215
46.
GuyS, 2002, “Developing interests: Environmental innovation and the social organisation of the property business”, in Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property Eds GuySHenneberryJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 247–266
47.
GuySOsbornS, 2001, “Contesting environmental design: The hybrid green building”, in Infrastructure in Transition: Urban Networks, Buildings, Plans Eds GuySMarvinSMossT (Earthscan, London) pp 87–102
48.
HaasP, 1992, “Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination”International Organisation461–35
49.
HajerM A, 1995The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
50.
HajerM AWagenaarH, (Eds) 2003Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
51.
HallP, 1988Cities of Tomorrow (Blackwell, Oxford)
52.
HamCHallM, 1993The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
53.
Hansard, 2003Written Answers for 16 July 2003: Homes (Modern Construction) (The Stationery Office, London)
HertinJBerkhoutFGannDBarlowJ, 2003, “Climate change and the UK house building sector: Perceptions, impacts and adaptive capacity”Building Research and Information31278–290
HooperANicolC, 2000, “Design practice and volume production in speculative housebuilding”Construction Management and Economics18295–310
58.
HughesT P, 1983Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Lanham, MD)
59.
HughesT P, 1987, “The evolution of large technological systems”, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology Eds BijkerW EHughesT PPinchT J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 51–82
60.
JamesNDesaiP, 2003One Planet Living in the Thames GatewayWWF UK and BioRegional Development Group, London
61.
JohnP, 2003, “Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change?”Policy Studies Journal31481–498
62.
JonesP, 2005, “The suburban high flat in the post-war reconstruction of Birmingham, 1945–71”Urban History32323–341
63.
JordanAGreenawayJ, 1998, “Shifting agendas, changing regulatory structures and the ‘new’ politics of environmental pollution: British coastal water policy, 1955–1995”Public Administration76669–694
64.
KempR, 1994, “Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability”Futures261023–1046
65.
KingdonJ W, 1995Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (HarperCollins, New York)
LindblomC E, 1959, “The science of ‘muddling through’”Public Administration Review1479–88
68.
London Borough of Enfield, 2003A Snapshot of Current Planning Policy and Practice on Sustainable Design and Construction in London BoroughsLondon Borough of Enfield and London Environment Coordinators Forum, London
69.
LovellH, 2005The Governance of Emerging Socio-technical Systems: The Case of Low Energy Housing in the UKunpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, Cambridge University, Cambridge
70.
LowensteinO, 2001, “From BedZed to eternity”Building for a Future Winter issue 2001–02, page 16–21
71.
MalpassP, 2000Housing Associations and Housing Policy: An Historical Perspective (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
72.
MalpassPMurieA, 1999Housing Policy and Practice (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
73.
MarshDRhodesR A W, (Eds) 1992aPolicy Networks in British Government (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
74.
MarshDRhodesR A W, 1992b, “Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology”, in Policy Networks in British Government Eds MarshDRhodesR A W (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 249–268
75.
NelsonRWinterS G, 1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
76.
NHBC, 2003New House Building Statistics: Quarter 3National House Building Council, Amersham, Bucks
77.
NicolCHooperA, 1999, “Contemporary change and the housebuilding industry: Concentration and standardisation in production”Housing Studies1457–76
OttH, 2001, “Climate change: An important foreign policy issue”International Affairs77277–296
87.
OwensSRaynerT, 1999, “When knowledge matters: The role and influence of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning17–24
88.
PettJRamsayL, 2003Routes to Sustainability: The HandbookAssociation for the Conservation of Energy, Practical Environment, The Housing Corporation, London
89.
PhillimoreJ, 2001, “Schumpeter, Schumacher and the Greening of Technology”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management1323–37
90.
PinchT JBijkerW E, 1984, “The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other”Social Studies of Science14399–441
91.
POST, 2003POSTnote: Modern Methods of House BuildingParliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London
92.
RadaelliC, 1995, “The role of knowledge in the policy process”Journal of European Public Policy2159–183
93.
RamanSShoveE, 2000, “The business of building regulation”, in The Business of Greening Ed. FinemanS (Routledge, London) pp 134–150
94.
RanmertW, 1997, “New rules of sociological method: Rethinking technology studies”British Journal of Sociology48171–191
95.
RCEP, 2000Energy: The Changing Climate, 22nd ReportRoyal Commission on Environmental Pollution (The Stationery Office, London)
96.
ReinMSchonD, 1993, “Reframing policy discourse”, in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Eds FischerFForesterJ (UCL Press, London) pp 145–166
97.
RichardsonJ, 2000, “Government, interest groups and policy change”Political Studies481006–1025
98.
RipAKempR, 1998, “Technological change”, in Human Choices and Climate Change. Volume 2: Resources and Technology Eds RaynerSMaloneE (Battelle Press, Columbus, OH) pp 327–399
99.
RohracherH, 2001, “Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management13137–150
100.
RossK, 2002Non-traditional Housing in the UK: A Brief ReviewBuilding Research Establishment for the Council of Mortgage Lenders, London
101.
SabatierP A, 1998, “The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe”Journal of European Public Policy598–130
102.
SabatierP ASmithJenkins H C, (Eds) 1993Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
103.
SchotJ WHoogmaRElzenB, 1994, “Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system”Futures261060–1076
104.
SchumpeterJ A, 1961The Theory of Economic Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
105.
ShapinSSchafferS, 1985Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
106.
SmithA, 1997, “Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: Explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1895–114
107.
SmithA, 2002, “Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches?”, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru
BrownSzejnwald HVergragtPGreenKBerchicciL, 2003, “Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management15291–316
110.
TarrJ A, 1999, “Transforming an energy system: The evolution of the manufactured gas industry and the transition to natural gas in the United States (1807–1954)”, in The Governance of Large Technical Systems Ed. CoutardO (Routledge, London) pp 19–37
111.
The Housing Corporation, 2003Capital Funding Guide: The Challenge FundThe Housing Corporation, London
The Housing Forum, 2001Homing in on Excellence: A Commentary on the Use of Offsite Fabrication Methods for the United Kingdom House Building IndustryThe Housing Forum, London
TrueJJonesB DBaumgartnerF R, 1999, “Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policy making”, in Theories of the Policy Process Eds SabatierP A (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 97–115
WalkerW, 2000, “Entrapment in large technology systems: Institutional commitment and power relations”Research Policy29833–846
120.
WeberK M, 2003, “Transforming large socio-technical systems towards sustainability: On the role of users and future visions for the uptake of city logistics and combined heat and power generation”Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research16155–175
121.
WiskerkeJ S C, 2003, “On promising niches and constraining sociotechnical regimes: The case of Dutch wheat and bread”Environment and Planning A35429–448
