BlomleyNK, 1994, “Activism and the academy”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12383–385
2.
BlunkettD, 2000, “Influence or irrelevance: can social science improve government?”, speech made by David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Education and Employment, to a meeting convened by the Economic and Social Research Council on 2 February”, http://www.bera.ac.uk/ri/no71/ri71blunkett.html
3.
BokD, 2003Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
4.
Cabinet Office, 1993Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science Engineering and Technology Cm 2250 (HMSO, London)
5.
CastreeN, 2000, “Professionalisation, activism, and the university: whither ‘critical geography’?”Environment and Planning A32955–970
6.
ChouinardV, 1994, “Reinventing radical geography: is all that's Left Right?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space122–6
7.
CollinsHMEvansR, 2002, “Third wave science studies: studies of expertise and experience”Social Studies of Science32235–296
8.
DemerittD, 2000, “The new social contract for science: accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy”Antipode32308–329
9.
DemerittDLeesL, 2005, “Research relevance and the geographies of CASE studentship collaboration”Area37(2) 127–137
10.
DorlingDShawM, 2002, “Geographies of the agenda: public policy, the discipline and its (re)‘turns’”Progress in Human Geography26629–646
11.
DTI, 1998Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy Cm 4176, Department for Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London) http://www.dti.gov.uk/comp/competitive/main.htm
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffL, 1997, “Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of university–industry–government relations”Science and Public Policy242–5
14.
European Commission, 2004Science and Technology, The Key to Europe's Future—Guidelines for Future European Union Policy to Support Research COM (2004) 353, Brussels
FullerDKitchinR, 2004, “Radical theory/critical praxis: academic geography beyond the academy?”, in Radical Theory, Critical Praxis: Making a Difference Beyond the Academy? Eds FullerDKitchinR (Praxis (e)Press, Vernon, BC) pp 1–20
17.
GibbonsM, 1999, “Science's new social contract with society”Nature402 (supplement) C81–C84
18.
HamnettC, 2003, “Contemporary human geography: fiddling while Rome burns”Geoforum341–3
19.
HarloeMPerryB, 2004, “Universities, localities, and regional development: the emergence of the ‘mode 2’ university?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28212–223
OST, 2000bExcellence and Opportunity: A Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century Cm 4814, Office for Science and Technology (The Stationery Office, London) http://www.ost.gov.uk/enterprise/dtiwhite/index.html
34.
PainR, 2004, “Social geography: participatory research”Progress in Human Geography28652–663
35.
Participatory Geographies Working Group, 2005, “Proposal to the Royal Geographical Society to establish a Participatory Geographies Working Group”, unpublished manuscript available from Duncan Fuller, School of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Lipman Building, Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST
36.
PhillipsL, 2000The Inquiry into BSE and Variant CJD in the United Kingdom 16 volumes (Stationery Office, London), http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/report/
37.
RappertB, 1995, “Shifting notions of accountability in public- and private-sector research in the UK: some central concerns”Science and Public Policy22383–390
38.
ReadingsB, 1996The University in Ruins (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)