The importance of creativity as a driving force in regional economic growth and prosperity has been previously documented; however, the mechanisms of this relationship are less well understood. Earlier research suggests, but does not demonstrate, that high levels of density and creative-class employment create conditions under which innovations generated by the interactions between individuals are more likely to occur. The authors examine the specific interactions among the creative, technical, business, and design communities of the Montréal region. It is demonstrated that such connections are possible and can have a positive impact on the innovative and total business activity across the region. A set of mechanisms through which creativity helps to achieve regional growth and prosperity benefits is demonstrated through specific examples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrowKJ, 1962, “The economic implications of learning by doing”Review of Economic Studies29155–173
2.
AudretschDBFeldmanMP, 1996, “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”American Economic Review86630–640
3.
Autant-BernardCMassardN, 2001, “Scientific interactions, geographic spillovers and innovation: an empirical study on the French case”, working paper, Centre de Recherches Economiques de l'Université de Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne
4.
BecksteadDBrownM, 2003, “From Labrador City to Toronto: the industrial diversity of Canadian cities, 1992–2002”, Catalogue 11-624-MIE-No. 003, Statistics Canada, Ottawa
5.
ClarkTN (Ed.), 2004The City as an Entertainment Machine (Elsevier, Oxford)
6.
CohenWMLevinthalDA, 1994, “Fortune favors the prepared firm”Management Science40227–251
DesrochersP, 2001, “Local diversity, human creativity, and technological innovation”Growth and Change32369–394
9.
DurantonGPugaD, 2000, “Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter?”Urban Studies37533–555
10.
FeldmanMP, 2000, “Location and innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkGGertlerMFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 373–394
11.
FloridaR, 2002aThe Rise of the Creative Class (Basic Books, New York)
12.
FloridaR, 2002b, “The economic geography of talent”Annals of the Association of American Geographers92743–755
13.
FloridaR, 2002c, “Bohemia and economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography255–71
14.
GlaeserEL, 2000, “The new economics of urban and regional growth”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkGGertlerMFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 83–98
15.
GlaeserELKallalHScheinkmanJShleiferA, 1992, “Growth in cities”Journal of Political Economy1001126–1152
16.
JacobsJ, 1969The Economy of Cities (Random House, New York)
17.
JaffeAB, 1986, “Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D”American Economic Review76984–1001
18.
KnudsenBFloridaRGatesGStolarickK, 2003, “Beyond spillovers: the effects of creative-density on innovation”, working paper, H John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
19.
LeeSY, 2001, “Innovation, human capital, and diversity”, working paper, H John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
20.
LucasR, 1988, “On the mechanics of economic development”Journal of Monetary Economics223–42
21.
MarshallA, 1890Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London)
22.
PorterM, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations, (Free Press, New York)
23.
PorterM, 1998, “Clusters and the new economics of competition”Harvard Business Review November–December, pages 77–90
24.
RomerP, 1986, “Increasing returns and long run growth”Journal of Political Economy941002–1037
25.
SaxenianAL, 1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
StolarickK, 2004, “Pittsburgh occupational clusters”, a report for the Pittsburgh Regional Alliance, working paper, Humanities and Social Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
28.
ZuckerLDarbyMBrewerM, 1998, “Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises”American Economic Review88290–306
