Explaining Continuity and Change in International Policies: Issue Linkage,Venue Change,and Learning on Policies for the River Scheldt Estuary 1967–2005
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2008
Explaining Continuity and Change in International Policies: Issue Linkage,Venue Change,and Learning on Policies for the River Scheldt Estuary 1967–2005
This paper aims to assess the explanatory power and to explore the compatibility of three major accounts of policy continuity and change in cross-border policy domains: negotiation analysis (NA), the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), and the punctuated-equilibrium (PE) framework. These frameworks are used to analyze policies for the river Scheldt estuary between 1967 and 2005. The estuary of the river Scheldt is situated partly in the Belgian region of Flanders and partly in the Netherlands. Major international policy issues in this estuary are the maritime access to the port of Antwerp, water and sediment pollution, and estuarine rehabilitation. It will be shown that the negotiations on these issues are characterized by complex issue linkages, and that NA does very well in explaining both deadlocks and international policy agreement. However, unlike the ACF, NA does not specify how actors come to define their interests. Moreover, we will argue that learning across the prodevelopment Antwerp coalition and the cross-border environmentalist coalition accounts for a gradual convergence of Dutch and Flemish perceived interests. Finally, PE offers useful complementary insights as Scheldt estuary policies cannot be understood without addressing the interrelations between the processes of negotiation, learning, the creation and enforcement of game rules, which have been going on in different venues simultaneously.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumgartnerF RJonesB D, 1993Agendas and Instability in American Politics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
2.
BaumgartnerF RJonesB D (Eds), 2002Policy Dynamics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
3.
BlatterJ, 2001, “Lessons from Lake Constance: ideas, institutions, and advocacy coalitions”, in Reflections on Water, New Approaches to Transboundary Conflicts and Cooperation Eds BlatterJIngramH (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 89–122
4.
Bond Beter Leefmilieu, Stichting Reinwater, 1989De Schelde, Vlaamse delta ecologisch rampgebied [The Scheldt, Flemish Delta is an ecological disaster], Bond Beter Leefmilieu, Amsterdam
5.
BouchezL J, 1978, “The Netherlands and the Law of international rivers”, in International Law in the Netherlandsvolume 1, Eds van PanhuysH FHeereW PJittaJ W WSikK SStuytA M (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn) pp 215–288
6.
COIB, 1994Bilaterale betrekkingen van V&W met België [Bilateral relationships between the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management and Belgium] (COIB, The Hague)
7.
DavisC L, 2004, “International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization”American Political Science Review98(1) 153–169
8.
DudleyGRichardsonJ, 1996, “Why does policy change over time? Adversarial policy communities, alternative policy arenas, and British trunk roads policy 1945–95”Journal of European Public Policy363–83
9.
EC, 2000, “Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy”Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL3271–73, 22 December (European Commission, Brussels)
10.
FischhendlerIFeitelsonEEatonD, 2004, “The short-term and long-term ramifications of linkages involving natural resources: the US–Mexico transboundary water case”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22633–650
11.
HaasE B, 1980, “Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes”World Politics32359–405
12.
HaasP M, 1992, “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination”International Organization461–35
13.
HaasP M, 2001, “Epistemic communities and policy knowledge”, in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavorial Sciences (Elsevier, New York) pp 11578–11586
14.
IPR, 1991De Schelde, een evaluatie van het beleid, de functies en de waterkwaliteit. Verslag in opdracht van de commissies Leefmilieu en havenvraagstukken van de Raadgevende Interparlementaire Benelux raad [The Scheldt, an evaluation of policies, functions and the water quality. Report on behalf of the Commissions for the environment and port affairs of the Benelux Council)] Interparlementaire Beneluxraad (Delta Instituut voor Hydrobiologisch Onderzoek, Yerseke)
15.
ISG, 1994Waterkwaliteitsbeheer in het Scheldestroomgebied [Water quality management in the Scheldt river basin)], International Scheldt Group, Middelburg
16.
Jenkins-SmithH CSabatierP A, 1993, “The dynamics of policy-oriented learning”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C (Westview Press, Boulder CO) pp 41–56
17.
JohnP, 1998Analysing Public Policy (Continuum, London)
18.
MartinL L, 1995, “Heterogeneity, linkage and commons problems”, in Local Commons and Global Interdependence, Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains Eds KeohaneR OOstromE (Sage, London) pp 71–92
19.
MeijerinkS, 1999Conflict and Cooperation on the Scheldt River Basin (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
20.
MeijerinkS, 2005, “Understanding policy stability and change: the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–2003”Journal of European Public Policy121060–1077
21.
Ministry of the Flemish region, Department for the Environment and Infrastructure, 1991De baggerwerken in de Schelde en de kwaliteit van water en bodem. Stand van zaken (Dredging works in the Scheldt and the quality of water and sediments. State of affairs), Brussels
22.
Ministry of the Flemish region, Department for the Environment and Infrastructure, 1995Beleidsplan sanering waterbodem Beneden-Zeeschelde [Policy plan for cleaning up the waterbed in the Lower-Sea Scheldt], Brussels
23.
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 1994aBeheer en onderzoek van Rijkswaterstaat in de Westerschelde, Aanbevelingen van een reviewteam en conclusies van Rijkswaterstaat [Policies and research of Rijkswaterstaat in the Western Scheldt. Recommendations made by a review team and conclusions drawn by Rijkswaterstaat], Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Regional Directorate Zeeland, Middelburg
24.
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 1994bEen internationale blik op het Schelde estuarium. Verslag van de Studie van een reviewteam, bestaande uit 7 deskundigen uit België en Nederland, betreffende studies van Rijkswaterstaat naar nieuwe beheerswijzen voor het Schelde-estuarium [An international perspective on the Scheldt estuary. Report of a study made by a review team of seven Belgian and Dutch experts about the management of the Scheldt estuary], Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Regional Directorate Zeeland, Middelburg
25.
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 1997Wetterscheide Stram of Struts. Eindrapport van het project OostWest, een Studie naar de beœnvloeding vanfysische en verwante biologische patronen in een estuarium [Western Scheldt. Final report of the project OostWest, a study on geomorphological and biological processes in an estuary], Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Research Institute for Coastal and Marine Management, Middelburg
26.
NiesingHSantbergenL L P Ade JongS A, 1996Marsh Amelioration along the River Schelde (MARS). Projectplan: The Restoration of Estuarine Habitats in the WesterscheldeMinistry of the Flemish region, Department of the Environment and Infrastructure, AMINAL, and Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Regional Directorate Zeeland, Report AX-95.072, Middelburg
27.
PlancharR-A, 1993L'Escaut et la Meuse, Fleuves Hollandais? Fleuves Siamois? [The Scheldt and the Meuse, Dutch or Siamese rivers?] (Liège)
28.
PralleS B, 2003, “Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: the internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy”Journal of Public Policy23233–260
29.
PutnamR, 1988, “Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games”International Organization51(1) 135–165
30.
RaiffaH, 1982Art and Science of Negotiation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
RaiffaHRichardsonJMetcalfeD, 2002Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
32.
RichardsonJ, 1996, “Policy-making in the EU: interests, ideas and garbage cans of primeval soup”, in European Union: Power and Policy-making Ed. RichardsonJ (Routledge, London) pp 3–23
33.
RichardsonJ, 2000, “Government, interest groups and policy change”Political Studies481006–1025
34.
RingelingA B, 1997Stromingen en consensus. Een bestuurskundige analyse van de besluitvorming over de compensatie van natuurwaarden in de Westerschelde. Advies voor de commissie Westerschelde [Streams and consensus. An analysis of decision making on the compensation of nature values in the Western Scheldt. Advice for the Commission Westerschelde], Rotterdam
35.
SabatierP A, 1993, “Policy change over a decade or more”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 13–39
36.
SabatierP A, 1998, “The advocacy coalition framework: revision and relevance for Europe”Journal of European Public Policy5(1) 98–130
37.
SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, 1999, “The advocacy coalition framework, an assessment”, in Theories of the Policy Process Ed. SabatierP A (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 117–166
SebeniusJ K, 1992a, “Challenging conventional explanations of international cooperation: negotiation analysis and the case of epistemic communities”International Organization46(1) 323–365
40.
SebeniusJ K, 1992b, “Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review”Management Science3818–38
41.
Stichting Reinwater, 1992Afvalwater en beleid België. Onderzoek naar de haalbaarheid van de internationale afspraken rond de Noordzee [Waste water and policy in Belgium. Research on the feasabihty of international agreements on the protection of the North Sea], Amsterdam
42.
StrubbeJ, 1988, “De waterverdragen” [The water conventions]Water7(42) 148–153
43.
SuykensF, 1995, “De historiek van het totstandkomen van de Vlaams–Nederlandse waterverdragen [History of the Flemish–Dutch water conventions]Water14(85) 227–232
44.
TK, Reports of discussions in the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament, The Hague 1977–78, 854 1985–86, 19200, No. 12 1994–95, 24041, No. 3
45.
Trb. (Treaty series of the Netherlands), The Hague. 2004–05, 29886, No. 1
46.
TK1994, 149, Verdrag inzake de bescherming van de Maas tegen verontreiniging [Convention on the protection of the Meuse against pollution]
47.
TK1994, 150, Verdrag inzake de bescherming van de Schelde tegen verontreiniging [Convention on the protection of the Scheldt against pollution]
48.
TK1995, 50, Verdrag inzake de afvoer van het water van de Maas [Convention on the flow of the river Meuse]
49.
TK1995, 51, Verdrag inzake de verruiming van de vaarweg in de Westerschelde [Convention on the deepening of the navigation channel in the Western Scheldt]
50.
TrueJ LJonesDBaumgartnerF R, 1999, “Punctuated-equilibrium theory, explaining stability and change in American policymaking”, in Theories of the Policy Process Ed. SabatierP A (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 97–115
51.
UN-ECE, 1992, “Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, E/ECE/1267, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva
