The authors take as their focus the advice on interior design and decoration that Singapore's Housing Development Board (HDB) distributed to residents as part of its programme of universal housing provision. Through a series of regular articles appearing in the HDB publication Our Home (1972–1989), readers were presented with stories that showed how selected HDB residents decorated their newly acquired highrise flats. The authors detail the relationship between this design advice and the commitment to modernist design principles, the self-conscious pragmatism of the HDB, and the reliance on a limited market logic (‘homeownership’). The HDB's vision of the benefit of its highrise housing programme was, from the outset, complexly entangled with cultivating individual investments in the home by way of interior design and decoration practices. The paper contributes not only to the specific story of Singaporean housing, but also to wider scholarship on modernism, the everyday practices of interior design, and housing consumption.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttfieldJ, 1989, “Inside pram town: a case study of Harlow house interiors, 1951–61”, in A View from the Interior: Women and Design Eds AttfieldJKirkhamP (The Women's Press, London) pp 215–238
2.
AttfieldJ, 1999, “Bringing modernity home: open plan in the British domestic interior”, in At Home: Space, Place and Society Ed. CieraadI (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) pp 73–82
3.
AynsleyJBerryF, 2005, “Publishing the modern home: magazines and the domestic interior 1870–1965”Journal of Design History18(1) 1–5
4.
BakerS, 1995, “To go about noisily: clutter, writing, and design”Émigré35 unpaginated
5.
BaudrillardJ, 2005The System of Objects (Verso, London); first published in 1996
6.
Baydar NalbantogluG, 1997, “Ideal, real and other spatial stories: thoughts on public housing in Singapore”Communal/Plural5115–130
7.
BenjaminW, 1973Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism translated by ZohnH (New Left Books, London)
8.
BenjaminW, 1999The Arcades Project (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA); first published in 1982
BuchliV, 1999An Archaeology of Socialism (Berg, Oxford)
11.
CastellsMGohLKwokR Y-W, 1990The Shek Kip Mei Syndrome: Economic Development and Public Housing in Hong Kong and Singapore (Pion, London)
12.
ChapmanDHockeyJ, 1999, “The ideal home as it is imagined and as it is lived”, in Ideal Homes? Social Change and Domestic Life Eds ChapmanTHockeyJ (Routledge, London) pp 1–14
13.
ChapmanT, 1999, “Stage sets for ideal lives: images of home in contemporary show homes”, in Ideal Homes? Social Change and Domestic Life Eds ChapmanTHockeyJ (Routledge, London) pp 44–58
14.
ChuaB-H, 1989, “The business of living in Singapore”, in Management of Success: The Moulding of Modern Singapore Eds SinghKWheatleyP (Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore) pp 1003–1021
15.
ChuaB-H, 1997Political Legitimacy and Housing: Stakeholding in Singapore (Routledge, London)
16.
ChuaB-H, 2003, “Maintaining housing values under the condition of universal home ownership”Housing Studies18765–780
17.
ClanceyG, 2004, “Towards a spatial history of emergency: notes from Singapore”, in Beyond Description: Singapore, Space, Historicity Eds BishopRPhillipsJYeoW-W-W (Routledge, London) pp 30–59
18.
ClarkeA J, 2001, “The aesthetics of social aspiration”, in Home Possessions Ed. MillerD (Berg, Oxford) pp 23–45
19.
CwernerS BMetcalfeA, 2003, “Storage and clutter: discourses and practices of order in the domestic world”Journal of Design History16229–239
20.
FlintJ, 2003, “Housing and ethopolitics: constructing identities of active consumption and responsible community”Economy and Society32611–629
21.
GullestadM, 1992The Art of Social Relations: Essays on Culture, Social Action and Everyday Life in Modern Norway (Scandinavian University Press, Oslo)
22.
HDB, 1964Annual ReportHousing Development Board, Singapore
23.
HollandE, 1988, “Schizoanalysis: the postmodern contextualization of psychoanalysis”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL) pp 405–417
24.
JacobsJ M, 2006, “A geography of big things”Cultural Geographies131–27
25.
KongL, 2000, “Cultural policy in Singapore: negotiating economic and socio-cultural agendas”, Geoforum31409–424
26.
KongLYeohB S A, 1994, “Urban conservation in Singapore: a survey of state policies and popular attitudes”Urban Studies31247–265
27.
KwekM L, 2004, “Singapore: a skyline of pragmatism”, in Beyond Description: Singapore Space Historicity Eds BishopRPhillipsJYeoW-W (Routledge, London) pp 112–124
28.
LaiA H, 1995The Meanings of Multiethnicity: A Case Study of Ethnicity and Ethnic Relations in Singapore (Oxford University Press, Singapore)
29.
Le Corbusier, 1924Urbanisme (Crès, Paris)
30.
Le Corbusier, 1987The Decorative Art of Today translated by DunnettJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA); first published 1925
31.
LimL, 1989, “Social welfare”, in Management of Success: The Moulding of Modern Singapore Eds SinghKWheatleyP (Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore) pp 171–200
32.
LinK-CTyabjiA, 1991, “Home ownership policy in Singapore: an evaluation”Housing Studies615–28
33.
LlewellynM, 2004, “‘Urban village’ or ‘white house’: envisioned spaces, experienced places, and everyday life at Kensal House, London in the 1930s”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22229–249
34.
LoosA, 1997Ornament and Crime translated by MitchellM (Ariadne Press, Riverside, CA); first published 1908
35.
LuiT K, 1985, “Overview” in Housing a Nation: 25 Years of Public Housing in Singapore Eds WongA KYehS H K (Maruzen Asia, Singapore) pp 1–29
36.
MadiganRMunroM, 1996, “‘House beautiful’: style and consumption in the home”Sociology3041–57
37.
MandersonL, 1996Sickness and the State: Health and Illness in Colonial Malaya, 1870–940 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
38.
MillerD, 1988, “Appropriating the state on the council estate”Man, New Series23353–372
39.
MillerD, 2001a“Behind closed doors”, in Home Possessions Ed. MillerD (Berg, Oxford) pp 1–19
40.
MillerD, 2001b, “Possessions”, in Home Possessions Ed. MillerD (Berg, Oxford) pp 107–121
41.
MillerPRoseN, 1997, “Mobilising the consumer: assembling the subject of consumption”Theory, Culture and Society141–36
42.
MuthesiusS, 2005, “Communcation between traders, users and artists: the growth of German language serial publications on domestic interior decoration in the later nineteenth century”Journal of Design History18(1) 7–20
43.
OsborneTRoseN, 1999, “Governing cities: notes on the spatialisation of virtue”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17737–760
44.
Our Home1972, “Editorial”, June, page 2
45.
Our Home1973a, “Interior of a decorator's flat”, May/June, pp 20–21
46.
Our Home1973b, “The do-it-yourself decorators”, January/February, pp 21–22
47.
Our Home1973c, “Stretch that space”, April, pp 15–16
48.
Our Home1974, “Simple and serene”, January/February, pp 37–38
49.
Our Home1975, “All light and space”, October, pp 8–9
50.
Our Home1976a, “More than just a roof”, December, pp 9–11
Our Home1980a, “Elegance at its simplest”, October, pp 18–19
57.
Our Home1980b, “The flat where East meets West”, June, page 12
58.
Our Home1980c, “Hide and show”, April, page 14
59.
Our Home1981a, “Keeping it simple”, April, pp 20–21
60.
Our Home1981b, “Private paradise with a professional touch”, June, pp 18–19
61.
Our Home1981c, “Simple does it!”, October, page 18
62.
Our Home1985, “The Continental Style”, October, pp 40–41
63.
Our Home1987, “A blend of East and West”, October, page 20
64.
Our Home1988, “Be a good neighbour”, August, pp 11–12
65.
Our Home1989a“La Italia!”, April/May, pp 28–29
66.
Our Home1989b“Vast variations”, August, pp 29–30
67.
PennartzP J, 1999, “The experience of atmosphere”, in At Home: An Anthropology of Domestic Space Ed. CieraadI (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) pp 95–106
68.
PerryMKongLYeohB, 1997Singapore: A Developmental City State (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
69.
PrashaV, 2001, “The technology of sanitation in colonial Delhi”Modern Àsian Studies35113–155
70.
ReedC, 1996Not at Home: The Suppression of Domesticity in Modern Art and Architecture (Thames and Hudson, London)
71.
RobinsonJ, 2006Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development (Routledge, London)
72.
RoseN, 1989Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (Routledge, London)
73.
RoseN, 1998Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
74.
SimmelG, 1950, “The metropolis and mental life”, in The Sociology of Georg Simmel translated by WolffK (Free Press, New York) pp 409–442; first published in 1903
75.
SorensenK H, 2002, “Social shaping on the move? On the policy relevance of the social shaping of technology perspective”, in Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools Eds SorensenK NWilliamsR (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 19–36
76.
SparkeP, 2004, “Introduction”, in Interior Design and Identity Eds McKellarSSparkeP (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 1–9
77.
SwansonM S, 1977, “The sanitation syndrome: bubonic plague and urban native policy in the Cape colony, 1900–1909”Journal of African History18387–410
78.
TanK JLohC TTanS ALauW CKwokK, 1985, “Physical planning and design” in Housing a Nation: 25 Years of Public Housing in Singapore Eds WongA KYehS H K (Maruzen Asia, Singapore) pp 56–112
79.
TanS Y, 1998, Private Ownership of Public Housing in Singapore (Times Academic Press, Singapore)
80.
ThomasN, 1990, “Sanitation and seeing: the creation of state power in early colonial Fiji”Comparative Studies in Society and History32149–170
81.
Tolia-KellyD, 2004, “Locating processes of identification: studying the precipitates of re-memory through artefacts in the British Asian home”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series29314–329
82.
TuY, 1999, “Public home ownership, housing finance and socioeconomic development in Singapore”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies11100–113
83.
van CaudenbergAHeynenH, 2004, “The rational kitchen in the inter-war period in Belgium: discourses and realities”Home Cultures123–50
84.
van HerckK, 2005, “‘Only where comfort ends does humanity begin’: on the ‘coldness’ of avant-guarde architecture in the Weimer period”, in Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture Eds HeynenHBaydorG (Routledge, London) pp 123–144
85.
WeeC W J-L, 2001, “The end of disciplinary modernisation? The Asian economic crisis and the ongoing reinvention of Singapore”Third World Quarterly22987–1002
86.
WigleyM, 1995White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
87.
WongA KYehS H K (Eds), 1985Housing a Nation: 25 Years of Public Housing in Singapore (Maruzen Asia, Singapore)
88.
WoodhamJ, 2004, “Design and everyday life at the Britain Can Make It exhibition, 1946”Journal of Architecture9463–476
89.
YeohB S A, 1996Contesting Space in Colonial Singapore: Power Relations in the Urban Built Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
90.
YoungD J B, 2004, “The material value of colour: the estate agent's tale”Home Cultures15–22
