Cities are increasingly cast as being shaped by globalization and related neoliberal policies. While these diverse literatures have provided needed theoretical advancement to rethink the city in relation to political–economic change, they also run the risk of conceptualizing, studying, and representing cities without sufficient attention to the spatial copresence of multiple actors. The result is that some treatments of the city reproduce a unified story line that conceals human agency, reads as if there is only one trajectory on which all cities are moving, and does not engage in imagining alternative urban futures. In this paper we suggest that there is a continued need to critically examine the spatial narratives mobilized both by researchers as well as by the other actors they encounter. Drawing on the widespread idea that the stories which researchers tell are intimately linked with the conduct of research itself, we advocate a researcher mode of engagement that permits collaborative critique of projects that aim to transform urban space. We report on our experience with two research practices—grounded interviewing, and the public research memo—to provide empirical examples of our perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BackLKeithM, 2004, “Impurity and the emancipatory city: Young people, community safety and racial danger”, in The Emancipatory City? Paradoxes and Possibilities Ed. LeesL (Sage, London) pp 57–71
2.
BakhtinM M, 1986, “The problem of speech genres”, in Speech Genres and Other Late Essays Eds EmersonCHolquistM, translated by McGeeV W (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 60–102
3.
BeharR, 1993Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza's Story (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
4.
BlomleyN, 1994, “Activism and the academy”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12383–385
5.
BlomleyN, 2006, “Uncritical critical geography?”Progress in Human Geography3087–94
6.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002, “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’”Antipode34349–379
7.
CastreeN, 2000, “Professionalisation, activism, and the university: Whither ‘critical geography?’”Environment and Planning A32955–970
8.
CastreeN, 2004, “Afterword: The geographical sublime”Antipode36985–989
9.
CastreeNSparkeM, 2000, “Professional geography and the corporatization of the university: Experiences, evaluations, and engagements”, introduction to the special issue Antipode32222–229
10.
CharmazK, 2002, “Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis”, in Handbook of Interview Research Eds GubriumJHolsteinA (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 675–694
11.
CoxK, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics”Political Geography171–23
12.
CraveyAArcuryTQuandtA, 2000, “Mapping as a means of farmworker education and empowerment”Journal of Geography99229–237
13.
DenzinN KLincolnY S, 2000, “Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research2nd edition Eds DenzinN KLincolnY S (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 1–28
14.
DixonD PJonesJ PIII, 2004, “What next?”Environment and Planning A36381–390
15.
FineM, 1994, “Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research Eds DenzinN RLincolnY S (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 70–82
16.
FineMWeisLWeseenSWongL, 2000, “For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research Eds DenzinN RLincolnY S (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 107–131
17.
FonowM MCookJ A (Eds), 1991Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN)
18.
FoxN J, 2003, “Practice-based evidence: Towards a collaborative and transgressive research”Sociology3781–102
19.
FraserJ, 2004, “Beyond gentrification: Mobilizing communities and claiming space”Urban Geography25437–457
20.
FullerD, 1999, “Part of the action, or ‘going native’? Learning to cope with the ‘politics of integration’”Area31221–227
21.
FullerDKitchinR, 2004, “Radical theory/critical praxis: Academic geography beyond the academy”, in Radical Theory/Critical Praxis: Making A Difference Beyond the Academy? Eds DullDKitchinR (Praxis (e)Press, Vernon, BC/Victoria, BC) pp 1–20, http://www.praxis-epress.org/rtcp/dfrk.pdf
22.
Gibson-GrahamJ K, 2002, “Beyond global vs. local: Economic politics outside the binary frame”, in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale Eds HerodAWrightM (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 20–25
23.
Gibson-GrahamJ K, 2003, “An ethics of the local”Rethinking Marxism15(1) 49–74
24.
GlaserBStraussA, 1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago, IL)
25.
GoffmanE, 1983, “The interaction ritual”American Sociological Review481–19
26.
GuptaAFergusonJ, 2001Culture, Power, Places: Explorations in Critical Anthropology (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
27.
HarawayD, 1988, “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective”Feminist Studies14575–599
28.
HertzE (Ed.), 1997Reflexivity and Voice (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
29.
HyndmanJ, 2001, “The field as here now, not there and then”Geographical Review91261–273
30.
Johnson-BaileyH, 2004, “Enjoying positionality and power in narrative work: Balancing contentious and modulating forces”, in Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences Eds deMarraisKLapanS D (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) pp 123–138
31.
KindonS L, 1995, “Dynamics of difference: Exploring empowerment methodologies with women and men in Bali”New Zealand Geographer5110–12
32.
KitchinR MHubbardP J, 1999, “Research, action and ‘critical geographies’”Area31195–198
33.
KobayashiA, 2001, “Negotiating the personal and the political in critical qualitative research”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 55–70
34.
KoehnD, 1998Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy (Routledge, New York)
35.
LathamAMcCormackD, 2004, “Moving cities: Rethinking the materialities of urban geographies”Progress in Human Geography28701–724
36.
LeesL, 1999, “Critical geography and the opening up of the academy: Lessons form ‘real life’ attempts”Area31377–383
37.
LeesL, 2000, “A reappraisal of gentrification: Towards a ‘geography of gentrification’”Progress in Human Geography24389–408
38.
LeesL, 2003, “Urban geography: ‘new urban geography and the ethnographic void’”Progress in Human Geography27107–113
39.
LeesL (Ed.), 2004The Emancipatory City? Paradoxes and Possibilities (Sage, London)
40.
LeyDMountzA, 2001, “Interpretation, representation, positionality: Issues in field research in human geography”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 234–247
41.
McDowellL, 1992, “Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17399–416
42.
McDowellL, 1999Gender, Identity and Place (Polity Press, Cambridge)
43.
McIntyreA, 2000Inner-city Kids: Adolescents Confront Life and Violence in an Urban Community (New York University Press, New York)
44.
MarstonSJonesJ PWoodwardK, 2005, “Human geography without scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30416–432
45.
MasseyD, 2005For Space (Sage, New York)
46.
MattinglyD, 2001, “Place, teenagers and representations: Lessons from a community theater project”Social and Cultural Geography2445–459
47.
MaxeyI, 1999, “Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research”Area31199–208
48.
MerrifieldA, 1995, “Situated knowledge through exploration: Reflections on Bunge's geographical expeditions”Antipode2749–70
49.
MohammadR, 2001, “‘Insiders’ and/or ‘outsiders’: Positionality, theory and praxis”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 101–117
50.
MohanG, 1999, “Not so distant, not so strange: The personal and the political in participatory research”Ethics, Place and Environment241–54
51.
PainR, 2003, “Social geography: On action-orientated research”Progress in Human Geography27649–657
52.
PainR, 2004, “Social geography: Participatory research”Progress in Human Geography28652–663
53.
PainRFrancisP, 2003, “Reflections on participatory research”Area3546–54
54.
PataiD, 1991, “US academics and third world women: Is ethical research possible?”, in Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History Eds GluckS BPataiD (Routledge, New York) pp 137–153
55.
PeetR, 2000, “Celebrating thirty years of radical geography”Environment and Planning A32951–953
56.
PrattGKirbyE, 2003, “Performing nursing: The BC Nurses Union Theatre Project”ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Human Geographies214–32
57.
PrytherchDMarstonS, 2005, “An urban geography of possibility”Urban Geography2697–99
58.
RandstromRDeurD, 1999, “Reciprocal appropriation: Towards and ethics of cross-cultural research”, in Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain Eds ProctorJ DSmithD M (Routledge, London) pp 237–250
59.
ReinharzS, 1992Feminist Methods in Social Research (Oxford University Press, New York)
60.
RobinsonJ, 2006Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development (Routledge, London)
61.
RoseG, 1993Feminism and Geography (Polity Press, Cambridge)
62.
RoseG, 1997, “Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics”Progress in Human Geography21305–320
63.
RoseG, 2001Visual Methodologies (Sage, London)
64.
RoutledgeP, 1996, “The third space as critical engagement”Antipode28399–419
65.
RoutledgeP, 2004, “Relational ethics of struggle”, in Radical Theory/Critical Praxis: Making a Difference Beyond the Academy Eds FullerDKitchinR (Praxis (e)Press, Vernon, BC/Victoria, BC) pp 79–91, http://www.praxis-express.org/rtcp/pr.pdf
66.
SakhoH, 2003, “Looking deep into the surface: Critical thinking and uncritical geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21142–147
67.
SandercockL, 2003a, “Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice”Planning Theory and Practice411–28
68.
SandercockL, 2003bCosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century (Continuum, New York)
69.
SchallerSModanG, 2005, “Contesting public space and citizenship: Implications for neighborhood business improvement districts”Journal of Planning Education and Research24394–407
70.
SlaterT, 2006, “The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30737–757
71.
SlaterTCurranWLeesL, 2004, “Gentrification research: New directions and critical scholarship”Environment and Planning A361141–1150
