This paper investigates the relationship between devolution and regional disparities by looking at the case of Italy. By integrating the relevant quantitative and qualitative evidence, it attempts to answer two questions. Did the devolutionary process exert a positive influence on regional convergence in Italy? And, if so, why have its beneficial economic effects been concentrated in the Mezzogiorno? A clear historical link between the upsurge of devolution and the reduction of spatial inequalities is identified. However, this relationship plays out in a rather indirect way, and is strongly influenced by a series of exogenous factors which are thoroughly analysed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcconciaADel MonteA, 1999, “Regional development and public spending: The case of Italy”Studi Economici72(3) 5–24
2.
AgnewJ, 2001, “Regions in revolt”Progress in Human Geography25103–111
3.
AkaiNSakataM, 2002, “Fiscal decentralisation contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States”Journal of Urban Economics5293–108
4.
AzfarOKahkonenSLanyiAMeagherPRutherfordD, 1999, “Decentralisation, governance and public services. The impact of institutional arrangements. A review of the literature”, working paper, IRIS Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
5.
BarroR JSala-I-MartinX, 1991, “Convergence across states and regions”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1107–182
6.
BarroR JSala-I-MartinX, 1995Economic Growth (McGraw-Hill, New York)
7.
BoldrinMCanovaF, 2001, “Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: Reconsidering European regional policies”Economic Policy16205–253
8.
BordignonM, 2005, “Alcune tesi sul federalismo fiscale all'Italiana”Economia Italiana2361–390
9.
CheshirePGordonI, 1998, “Territorial competition: Some lessons for policy”Annals of Regional Science321–26
10.
CheshirePMagriniS, 2000, “Endogenous processes in European regional growth: Convergence and policy”Growth and Change31455–479
11.
CiriaciD, 2001, “Convergenza e dualismo: Nord e Sud tra il 1970 e il 1999”Rivista Economica del Mezzogiorno15763–802
12.
DanieleV, 2005, “Divari occupazionali e convergenza in Italia. Un'analisi per il periodo 1980–2003”, working paper, Dipartimento di Diritto dell'Organizzazione Pubblica, Economia e Società, Università di Catanzaro
13.
DavoodiHZouH F, 1998, “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth: A cross-country study”Journal of Urban Economics43244–257
14.
De SiervoU, 2004, “II sistema delle fonti: Il riparto della potestà normativa tra Stato e Regioni”, http://www.federalismi.it (online journal of law)
15.
EbelRYilmazS, 2002, “On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralisation”, Policy Research, WP 2809, The World Bank, Washington, DC
16.
EderveenSde GrootHNahuisR, 2003, “Fertile soil for Structural Funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy”, Tjaling C Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht School of Economics, DP 03–14
17.
FaddaMMontemurroF, 2004Fondi UE e sviluppo locale (Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano)
18.
GiannoneC, 2006Il federalismo fiscale. Teoria e pratica (Francoangeli, Milano)
19.
IMF, 2003, “Italy: Selected issues”, Country Report 03/352, International Monetary Fund, IMF, Washington, DC
20.
KlugmanJ, 1994, “Decentralisation: A survey of literature from a human development perspective”, OP 13, Human Development Report Office, UNDP, New York
21.
LeonardiR, 2006, “The impact and added value of Cohesion Policy. Cohesion in the European Union”Regional Studies40155–166
22.
LitvackJAhmadJBirdR, 1998, “Rethinking decentralisation in developing countries”Sector Studies Series (The World Bank, Washington, DC)
23.
LoddoS, 2006, “Structural Funds and regional convergence in Italy”, WP 2006/03, Centre for North–South Economic Research, Cagliari
24.
LucasR, 1988, “On the mechanics of economic development”Journal of Monetary Economics223–42
25.
MartinRTylerP, 2006, “Evaluating the impact of the Structural Funds on Objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion”Regional Studies40201–210
26.
MilioS, 2007, “Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from Structural Funds implementation in Southern Italy”Regional Studies41429–442
27.
MorganK, 2006, “Devolution and development: Territorial justice and the North–South divide”The Journal of Federalism36189–206
28.
MusgraveR A, 1959The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy (McGraw-Hill, New York)
29.
NappiniF, 2005, “The decentralisation process in Italy: A brief analysis”, working paper, Framework for the Cooperate Project, European Citizen Action Service
OngaroE, 2006, “The dynamics of devolution processes in legalistic countries: Organisational change in the Italian public sector”Public Administration84737–770
33.
PaciRPigliaruF, 1999, “Growth and sectoral dynamics in the Italian regions”, in Economic Growth and Change: National and Regional Pattern of Convergence and Divergence Eds AdamsJPigliaruF (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 291–322
34.
PaciRSabaA, 1997, “The empirics of regional economic growth in Italy 1951–1993”, Contributi di Ricerca, 97/01, Centre for North–South Economic Research, Cagliari
35.
Prud'hommeR, 1995, “The dangers of decentralisation”The World Bank Research Observer10201–220
36.
PutnamRLeonardiRNannettiR Y, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
37.
Rodríguez-PoseAFratesiU, 2004, “Between development and social policies: The impact of the European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions”Regional Studies3897–113
38.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2003, “The global trend towards devolution and its implications”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21333–351
39.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2004, “Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution”Environment and Planning A362097–2117
40.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2005, “On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution”Regional Studies39405–420
41.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2006, “How does trade affect regional disparities?”World Development341201–1222
42.
SachsJ DWarnerAAslundAFischerS, 1995, “Economic reform and the process of global integration”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity11–118
43.
Sala-I-MartinX, 1996, “Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence”European Economic Review401325–1352
44.
ThießenU, 2003, “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries”Fiscal Studies24237–274
45.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
46.
TrigiliaC, 1992a, “Italian industrial districts: Neither myth nor interlude”, in Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration Eds PykeFSengenbergerW (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva) pp 33–47
47.
TrigiliaC, 1992bSviluppo senza autonomia. Effetti perversi delle politiche nel Mezzogiorno (Il Mulino, Bologna)
48.
TrigiliaC, 1995Cultura e sviluppo. L'associazionismo nel Mezzogiorno (Meridiana/Donzelli, Roma)
49.
ZhangTZouH F, 1998, “Fiscal decentralisation, public spending, and economic growth in China”Journal of Public Economics67221–240
50.
ZhangTZouH F, 2001, “The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: With applications to China and India”China Economic Review1258–81
