Neighbourhood Effects on Youth Educational Achievement in the Netherlands: Can Effects Be Identified and Do They Vary by Student Background Characteristics?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2009
Neighbourhood Effects on Youth Educational Achievement in the Netherlands: Can Effects Be Identified and Do They Vary by Student Background Characteristics?
Adding to the growing body of research examining neighbourhood effects in European contexts, this study investigates the associations between the educational achievement of Dutch youth and their neighbourhood conditions. We further consider whether these associations vary by student socioeconomic status (SES), gender, or nativity. Results from a multilevel analysis of 17 836 secondary school students living in 3085 neighbourhoods indicate significant relationships between several dimensions of the neighbourhood context and educational achievement. Student SES and nativity appear to moderate some of these effects. In particular, we find the negative effect of neighbourhood disadvantage to be almost entirely restricted to native youth. The achievement outcomes of students with higher levels of SES also appear to be less affected by neighbourhood affluence and disadvantage than those of lower-SES students. Our results suggest that the impact of neighbourhood conditions on certain groups of youth may be obscured in studies that measure average neighbourhood effects across all individuals. Future research which examines neighbourhood effects and mechanisms across subgroups of youth, and which examines the links between the neighbourhood, family, and school contexts, can help us to better determine the neighbourhood's role in youth education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronsonD, 2000, “A note on the benefits of home ownership”Journal of Urban Economics47356–369.
2.
AinsworthJ W, 2002, “Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement”Social Forces81 (1) 117–152.
3.
AnderssonE, 2004, “From valley of sadness to hill of happiness: The significance of surroundings for socioeconomic career”Urban Studies41641–659.
4.
AnderssonESubramanianS, 2006, “Explorations of neighbourhood and educational outcomes for young Swedes”Urban Studies432013–2025.
5.
BrännströmL, 2008, “Making their mark: The effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement”European Sociological Review24463–478.
6.
BronfenbrennerU, 1989, “Ecological systems theory”Annals of Child Development6 (1) 87–249.
7.
BronfenbrennerUMorrisP A, 1998, “The ecology of developmental processes”, in Handbook of Child Psychology volume 1, Eds DamonWLernerR M (John Wiley, New York) pp 993–1028.
8.
Brooks-GunnJDuncanGAberJ (Eds), 1997Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).
9.
CohenJ, 1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2nd edition (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
10.
CookT DHermanM RPhillipsMSetterstenJ, 2002, “Some ways in which neighborhoods, nuclear families, friendship groups, and schools jointly affect changes in early adolescent development”Child Development731283–1309.
11.
CraneJ, 1991, “The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing”The American Journal of Sociology961226–1259.
12.
CrowderKSouthS J, 2003, “Neighborhood distress and school dropout: The variable significance of community context”Social Science Research32659–698.
13.
DietzR D, 2002, “The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach”Social Science Research31539–575.
14.
DorlingDSmithGNobleMWrightGBurrowsRBradshawJJoshiHPattieCMitchellRGreenA EMcCullochA, 2001, “How much does place matter?”Environment Planning A331335–1369.
15.
DrukkerMKaplanCFeronFVan OsJ, 2003, “Children's health-related quality of life, neighbourhood socio-economic deprivation and social capital: A contextual analysis”Social Science Medicine57825–841.
16.
DuncanG J, 1994, “Families and neighbors as sources of disadvantage in the schooling decisions of white and black adolescents”American Journal of Education103 (1) 20–53.
17.
DuncanG JRaudenbushS W, 1999, “Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development”Educational Psychologist3429–41.
18.
EllenI GTurnerM A, 1997, “Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence”Housing Policy Debate8833–866.
19.
EvansW NOatesW ESchwabR M, 1992, “Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior”Journal of Political Economy100966–991.
20.
FurstenbergF F, 1993, “How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods,” in Sociology and the Public Agenda Ed. WilsonW J (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 231–258.
21.
GalsterG, 2008, “Quantifying the effect of neighbourhood on individuals: Challenges, alternative approaches, and promising directions”Schmollers Jahrbuch128 (1) 7–48.
22.
GalsterGMarcotteD EMandellMWolmanHAugustineN, 2007, “The influence of neighborhood poverty during childhood on fertility, education, and earnings outcomes”Housing Studies22723–751.
23.
GarnerC LRaudenbushS W, 1991, “Neighborhood effects on educational attainment: A multilevel analysis”Sociology of Education64251–262.
24.
GrambergP, 1998, “School segregation: The case of Amsterdam”Urban Studies35547–564.
25.
GrambergP, 2000De School als Spiegel van de Omgeving: Een Geografische Kijk op Oderwijs [The school as a mirror of its environment: A geographical view on education], PhD dissertation, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
26.
JacksonM IMareR D, 2007, “Cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of neighborhood experience and their effects on children”Social Science Research36590–610.
27.
JarrettR L, 1997, “Bringing families back in: Neighborhood effects on child development”, in Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children Eds Brooks-GunnJDuncanGAberJ (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 48–64.
28.
JencksCMayerS E, 1990, “The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood”, in Inner City Poverty in the United States Eds LynnL EMcGrearyMGH (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 111–186.
29.
KarstenSLedouxGRoeleveldJFelixCElshofD, 2003, “School choice and ethnic segregation”Educational Policy11452–477.
30.
KarstenSFelixCLedouxGMeijnenWRoeleveldJVan SchootenE, 2006, “Choosing segregation or integration? The extent and effects of ethnic segregation in Dutch cities”Education and Urban Society38228–247.
31.
KauppinenT M, 2007, “Neighborhood effects in a European city: Secondary education of young people in Helsinki”Social Science Research36421–444.
32.
KauppinenT M, 2008, “Schools as mediators of neighbourhood effects on choice between vocational and academic tracks of secondary education in Helsinki”European Sociological Review24379–391.
33.
KohenD ELeventhalTDahintenV SMcIntoshC N, 2008, “Neighborhood disadvantage: Pathways of effects for young children”Child Development79 (1) 156–169.
34.
KunzJPageM ESolonG, 2003, “Are point-in-time measures of neighborhood characteristics useful proxies for children's long-run neighborhood environment?”Economics Letters79231–237.
35.
KuyperHLubbersM JVan der WerfMPC, 2003, “VOCL′99–1: Technisch rapport” [VOCL′99–1: Technical report], Groningen Institute for Educational Research, Groningen.
36.
LeventhalTBrooks-GunnJ, 2000, “The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes”Psychological Bulletin126309–337.
37.
LuptonR, 2003, “Neighbourhood effects: Can we measure them and does it matter?”, CASE paper 73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London.
38.
McCullochA, 2006, “Variation in children's cognitive and behavioural adjustment between different types of place in the British National Child Development Study”Social Science Medicine621865–1879.
39.
McCullochAJoshiH E, 2001, “Neighbourhood and family influences on the cognitive ability of children in the British National Child Development Study”Social Science Medicine53579–591.
40.
OberwittlerD, 2007, “The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: A multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity”Housing Studies22781–803.
41.
OliverL NDunnJ RKohenD EHertzmanC, 2007, “Do neighbourhoods influence the readiness to learn of kindergarten children in Vancouver? A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood effects”Environment and Planning A39848–868.
42.
ParkR EBurgessE W, 1924Introduction to the Science of Sociology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
43.
PinderhughesE ENixRFosterE MJonesD, 2001, “Parenting in context: Impact of neighborhood poverty, residential stability, public services, social networks, and danger on parental behaviors”Journal of Marriage and Family63941–953.
44.
PinksterFFortuijnDroogleever J, 2008, “Watch out for the neighborhood trap! A case study on parental perceptions of and strategies to counter negative neighborhood influences on child development”, paper presented at the Association of American Geographers (AAG) Annual General Meeting, 14–19 April, Boston, available from the AAG, 1710 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC.
45.
RankinB HQuaneJ M2002, “Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: The interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth”Social Problems49 (1) 79–100.
46.
RasbashJSteeleFBrowneWProsserB, 2000A User's Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.0 Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol.
47.
RaudenbushS WBrykA S, 2002Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).
48.
RoheWStewartL, 1996, “Home ownership and neighborhood stability”Housing Policy Debate737–81.
49.
SampsonR JMorenoffJ DEarlsF, 1999, “Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children”American Sociological Review64633–660.
50.
SampsonR JMorenoffJ DGannon-RowleyT, 2002, “Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research”Annual Review of Sociology28443–478.
51.
SastryNGhosh-DastidarBAdamsJPebleyA R, 2006, “The design of a multilevel survey of children, families, and communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey”Social Science Research351000–1024.
52.
ShawC RMcKayH D, 1942Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
53.
SnijdersTABBoskerR J, 1999Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London).
54.
TeelkenC, 1999, “Market mechanisms in education: School choice in The Netherlands, England and Scotland in a comparative perspective”Comparative Education35283–302.
55.
ten BroekeLBosfeldWvan de KieftMGerritsenLKoopmanCKuhnenCEijkenB, 2004, “Schoolkeuzemotieven: Onderzoek naar het schoolkeuzeproces van Amsterdamse ouders” [School choice motivation: Research about the school choice process of Amsterdam parents], Gemeente Amsterdam, Dienst Onderzoek en statistiek, Amsterdam, http://www.os.amsterdam.nl/pdf/2004_schoolkeuzemotieven.pdf.
56.
ValentineG, 1997, “‘Oh yes I can’ ‘Oh no you can't’: Children and parents' understandings of children's competence to negotiate public space safely”Antipode2965–89.
57.
van BerkelK, 1999, “Steekproef voor schoolloopbaan onderzoek VOCL′99” [Sample for educational career project VOCL′99], Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek [Statistics Netherlands], Heerlen, The Netherlands.
58.
WilsonW J, 1987The Truly Disadvantaged (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
