I examine the relationship between student mobility associated with open enrolment and student sorting in public schools in Los Angeles County and find that open enrolment provides Latino students who attend outside their neighbourhoods access to higher quality, more integrated, schools than those who remain enroled in their neighbourhood schools. However, attendance at majority-white schools continues to be highly segregated. Therefore, while open enrolment may provide some minority students with the opportunity to avoid attending a majority-minority school, it does not undo the mechanisms through which white students remain socially and spatially segregated from their minority counterparts. The lack of meaningful interracial and cross-cultural exchange during the school-age years is a worrying trend that could lead to increased polarization and social exclusion in Los Angeles and other multiethnic cities and communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 2002, “Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity”Environment and Planning A34959–980
2.
AnyonJ, 1996Ghetto Schooling: A Political Economy of Urban Educational Reform (Teachers College Press, New York)
3.
ArmorD J, 1995Forced Justice: School Desegregation and the Law (Oxford University Press, New York)
4.
BartonP, 2003Parsing the Achievement GapEducational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
5.
BoboLOliverMJohnsonJValenzuelaA, 2000Prismatic Metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
CaldasS JBankstonC LCainJ S, 2007, “A case study of teachers' perceptions of school desegregation and the redistribution of social and academic capital”Education and Urban Society39194–222
8.
California Department of Education, 2008, “2007–08 academic performance index reports information guide”, California Department of Education, Sacramento, CA, http://www.cde.ca.gov/api/
9.
ClarkK B, 1965Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power (Harper and Row, New York)
10.
ClarkW A V, 1987, “Demographic change, attendance area adjustment and school system impacts”Population Research and Policy Review6199–222
11.
ClotfelterC T, 1979, “Urban school desegregation and declines in white enrolment”Journal of Urban Economics6352–370
12.
ClotfelterC T, 2001, “Are whites still fleeing? Racial patterns and enrollment shifts in urban public schools 1987–1996”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20199–221
EppleDRomanoR, 2003, “Neighbourhood schools, choice and the distribution of educational benefits”, in The Economics of School Choice Ed. HoxbyC (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 227–286
15.
FarleyRRichardsTWurdockC, 1980, “School desegregation and white flight—an investigation of competing models and their discrepant findings”Sociology of Education53123–139
16.
FinnC E, 1990, “Why we need choice”, in Choice in Education Eds BoydW LWalbergH J (McCutchan Publishing, Berkeley, CA) pp 3–20
17.
FongT P, 1998The Contemporary Asian American Experience: Beyond the Model Minority (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
GottschalkPDanzigerS, 2003, “Wage inequality earnings inequality and poverty in the US over the last quarter of the twentieth century”, WP 560, Boston College Department of Economics, Boston, MA
20.
HanushekE A, 1997, “Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19141–164
21.
HanushekE AKainJ FRivkinS G, 2004, “Why public schools lose teachers”The Journal of Human Resources39326–354
22.
HarrisD NHeringtonC D, 2006, “Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century”American Journal of Education112209–238
23.
JamesD R, 1989, “The effects of city–suburb boundaries on public school desegregation 1968–1976”American Sociological Review54963–985
24.
JencksCPhilipsM, 1998The Black–White Test Score Gap (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
25.
JepsenCRivkinS, 2002Class Size Reduction, Teacher Quality, and Academic Achievement in California Public Elementary SchoolsPublic Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA
26.
JohnstonR JWilsonDBurgessS, 2004, “School segregation in multiethnic England”Ethnicities4237–265
27.
JohnstonR JPoulsenMForrestJ, 2007, “The geography of ethnic residential segregation: A comparative study of five countries”Annals of the Association of American Geographers97713–718
28.
KozolJ, 1991Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools (Crown, New York)
29.
KozolJ, 1994Amazing Grace (Crown, New York)
30.
LaddHWalshR, 2002, “Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: Getting the incentives right”Economics of Education Review211–17
31.
LankfordHWyckoffJ, 2000, “The effect of school choice and residential location on the racial segregation of students”, State University of New York, Albany, NY, http://www.albany.edu/∼wyckoff/segpapr14.PDF
32.
LedwithVClarkW A V, 2007, “The effect of the residential mosaic and white flight on public school composition: Evidence from Los Angeles County”Urban Geography28160–180
33.
LeeJ, 2002, “Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity?”Educational Researcher313–12
LoganJ RAlbaR D, 1993, “Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources”Demography30243–268
36.
MasseyDDentonN A, 1993American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
37.
MoranP W, 2005, “Too little, too late: The illusive goal of school desegregation in Kansas City, Missouri, and the role of the federal government”Teachers College Record1071933–1955
38.
MorrisJ E, 2004, “Can anything good come from Nazareth? Race, class and African American schooling and community in the urban South and Midwest”American Educational Research Journal4169–112
39.
MorrisV GMorrisC L, 2002The Price They Paid: Desegregation in an African American Community (Teachers College Press, New York)
40.
MyrdalG, 1944An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (Harper and Brothers, New York)
41.
National Center for Education Statistics, 2006The Condition of EducationUS Department of Education, Washington, DC, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/
42.
National Center for Education Statistics, 2007The Condition of EducationUS Department of Education, Washington, DC, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/
43.
NechybaT, 2003, “Introducing school choice into multi-district public school systems”, in The Economics of School Choice Ed. HoxbyC (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 145–194
44.
O'ConnellJ, 2008The Academic Performance Index: An Agent of Change in California EducationCalifornia Department of Education, Sacramento, CA
PoulsenMJohnstonRForrestJ, 2001, “Intraurban ethnic enclaves: Introducing a knowledge-based classification method”Environment and Planning A332071–2082
48.
ReardonSYunJ T, 2002Private School Racial Enrollments and Segregation The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
49.
ReardonS FYunF TMcNultyE T, 2000, “The changing structure of school segregation: Measurement and evidence of multiracial metropolitan-area school segregation 1989–1995”Demography31351–364
50.
RossellC H, 1990The Carrot or the Stick for School Desegregation Policy: Magnet Schools or Forced Busing (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
51.
RossellC H, 1994, “The progeny of Brown: From the old freedom of choice to the new freedom of choice in four decades”Urban Geography15435–453
52.
RossellC HArmorD J, 1996, “The effectiveness of school desegregation plans 1968–1991”American Politics Quarterly24267–302
53.
SaporitoS, 2003, “Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty”Social Problems50181–203
54.
SchofieldJ W, 1995, “Review of research on school desegregation's impact on elementary and secondary school students”, in Handbook of Multicultural Education Eds BanksJ ABanksMcGee C A (Macmillan, New York) pp 597–617
55.
SirinS R, 2005, “Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research”Review of Educational Research75417–453
56.
StiefelLSchwartzA EChellmanC C, 2007, “So many children left behind—segregation and the impact of subgroup reporting in no child left behind on the racial test score gap”Educational Policy21527–550
