In this short and deliberately provocative paper I reflect on what seems to be a yawning gulf between the potential contribution of the social sciences and the typically restricted models and concepts of social change embedded in contemporary environmental policy in the UK, and in other countries too. As well as making a strong case for going beyond what I refer to as the dominant paradigm of ‘ABC’—attitude, behaviour, and choice—I discuss the attractions of this model, the blind spots it creates, and the forms of governance it sustains. This exercise provides some insight into why so much relevant social theory remains so marginalised, and helps identify opportunities for making better use of existing intellectual resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA, 2001Chaos of Disciplines (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
2.
AbernathyW JClarkK B, 1985, “Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction”Research Policy143–22
3.
AjzenI, 1991, “The theory of planned behavior”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50179–211
BerkhoutFSmithAStirlingA, 2004, “Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts”, in System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy Eds ElzenBGeelsF WGreenK (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 48–75
6.
BlairT, 2006Climate Change: The UK Programme (The Stationery Office, London)
7.
BlakeJ, 1999, “Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience”Local Environment4257–278
DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (The Stationery Office, London) 2005Changing Behaviour Through Policy Making (The Stationery Office, London)
DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (The Stationery Office, London) 2008A Framework for Pro-environmental Behaviours (The Stationery Office, London)
de WitOvan den EndeJ C MSchotJvan OostE, 2002, “Innovation junctions: office technologies in the Netherlands, 1880–1980”Technology and Culture4350–72
15.
DietzTGardnerG TGilliganJSternP CVandenberghM P, 2009, “Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10618452–18456
16.
DixonJBroomD (Eds), 2007The Seven Deadly Sins of Obesity (UNSW Press, Sydney)
17.
EggerGSwinburnB, 1997“An ‘ecological’ approach to the obesity pandemic”British Medical Journal315(7106) 477–480
18.
ElzenBGeelsF WGreenK, 2004System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
19.
GaterslebenBVlekC, 1997, “Household consumption, quality of life and environmental impacts”, in Green Households Eds NoormanTSchoot-UiterkampT (Earthscan, London) pp 141–179
HandMShoveE, 2004, “Orchestrating concepts: kitchen dynamics and regime change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home, 1922–2002”Home Cultures1235–256
26.
HandMShoveESouthertonD, 2005, “Explaining showering: a discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice”Sociological Research Online10(2), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/hand.html
27.
HargreavesTNyeMBurgessJ, 2007, “Analysing a facilitated behaviour change process through the lens of social practice theory”, 8th Conference of the European Sociological Association Sociology of Consumption Network, Glasgow, 3–6 September, http://www.esa-consumption.org/papers/hargreaves
KempRLoorbachD, 2006, “Transition management: a reflexive governance approach”, in Reflexive Governance Eds VossJ PKempRBauknechtD (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 103–130
30.
LakeA, 2006, “Obesogenic environments”Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health126(6) 262–267
31.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1986Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
32.
LefebvreH, 2004Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life (Continuum, London)
33.
MossT, 2000, “Unearthing water flows, uncovering social relations: introducing new waste water technologies in Berlin”Journal of Urban Technology763–84
ReckwitzA, 2002, “Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing”European Journal of Social Theory5243–263
38.
RipA, 2006, “A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance and its ironies”Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development Eds VossJ PBauknechtDKempR (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 82–100
39.
RotmansJKempRvan AsseltM, 2001, “More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy”Foresight315–31
40.
SchatzkiT R, 1996Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
41.
SchatzkiT R, 2002The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change (Penn State University Press, University Park, PA)
42.
ShoveE, 2003Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality (Berg, Oxford)
43.
ShoveEPantzarM, 2006, “Fossilisation”Ethnologia Europaea: Journal of European Ethnology35(1/2) 59–63
44.
ShoveEWalkerG, 2007, “CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management”Environment and Planning A39763–770
SmithAStirlingABerkhoutF, 2005, “The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions”Research Policy341491–1510
47.
SouthertonDChappellsHvan VlietB (Eds), 2004Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
48.
SpaargarenGMartensSBeckersT, 2006, “Sustainable technologies and everyday life”, in User Behaviour and Technology Development: Shaping Sustainable Relations Between Consumers and Technologies Eds VerbeekP PSlobA (Springer, Dordrecht) pp 107–118
49.
SternN, 2006The Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
50.
SternP, 2000, “Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior”Journal of Social Issues56407–424
SwimJClaytonSDohertyTGiffordRHowardGReserJSternPWeberE, 2009, “Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges”, http://www.apa.org/releases/climate-change.pdf
53.
SzerszynskiB, 2010, “Reading and writing the weather: climate technics and the moment of responsibility”Theory Culture and Society27(2–3) 9–30
54.
TownshendTLakeA A, 2008, “Obesogenic urban form: theory, policy and practice”Health and Place in press, available online at doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.12.002
UrryJ, 2010, “Consuming the planet to excess”Theory Culture and Society27(2–3) 191–212
58.
UzzellD, 2008, “The challenge of climate change: the challenge for psychology”, 43rd Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference, Hobart, Tasmania
59.
van VlietBChappellsHShoveE, 2005Infrastructures of Consumption: Environmental Innovation in the Utility Industries (Earthscan, London)
