Emissions trading has created new forms of exchangeable property which become commodities when traded in markets designed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and mitigate climate change. This paper analyzes a set of social processes which influence who benefits from reductions in emissions generated by primary production from forest ecosystems. Informed by commodification literature, and property and access theory, we suggest that farmers and rural communities cannot derive full benefits from carbon sequestration because they lack key structural and relational mechanisms, such as capital, knowledge, expertise, technology, and, in some cases, even labour. We illustrate this argument by examining three ongoing carbon-forestry projects in China, Ecuador, and Mexico and we highlight its implications for future forestry mitigation projects and programmes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbánMArgüelloM, 2004, “Un análisis de los impactos sociales y económicos de los proyectos de fijación de carbono en el Ecuador. El caso de PROFAFOR-FACE”, Markets for Environmental Services No 7, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
2.
AMBIO, 2008, “Annual Report 2007, Scolel Te”, Ingeniería Ambiontal, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Mexico.
3.
AndersonTLealD, 2001Free Market Environmentalism (Palgrave, New York).
4.
BachramH, 2004. “Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases”Capitalism Nature Socialism15(4) 5–20.
5.
BackstrandKLövbrandE, 2006, “Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism”Global Environmental Politics650–75.
6.
BailisR, 2006, “Climate change mitigation and sustainable development through carbon sequestration: Experiences in Latin America”Energy for Sustainable Development10(4) 74–87.
7.
BakkerK, 2005, “Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales”Annals of the Association of American Geographers95542–565.
8.
BakkerK, 2009, “Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research”Environment and Planning A411781–1787.
9.
BaldwinA, 2009, “Carbon nullius and racial rule: The cultural politics of forest carbon in Canada”Antipode41231–255.
10.
BetsillM M, 2009, “Governance and authority in the global carbon market”International Human Dimensions Programme Update39–13.
11.
BinkleyC SBrandDHarkinZBullGRavindranathN HObersteinerMNilssonSYamagataYKrottM, 2002, “Carbon sink by the forest sector—options and needs for implementation”Forest Policy and Economics465–77.
12.
BoydEMayPChangMVeigaF, 2007, “Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia”Environmental Science and Policy10419–433.
13.
BrownKCorberaE, 2003, “Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy”Climate Policy3(S1) 41–56.
14.
BrownKAdgerW NBoydECorberaESchackleyS, 2004, “How do CDM projects contribute to sustainable development?”, TR 16, Tyndall Centre, Norwich.
15.
BruceJ WFortmannL, 1999, “Contemporary uses of tree tenure in Louise”, in Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems Eds BuckELassoieJ PFernandesECM (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) pp 237–244.
16.
BumpusALivermanD, 2008, “Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets”Economic Geography84127–155.
17.
BuytaertWWyseureGde BièvreBDeckersJ, 2005, “The effects of land-use changes on the hydrological behaviour of Histic Andosols in south Ecuador”Hydrological Processes193985–3997.
18.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34535–548.
19.
CampbellB M, 2009, “Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and poverty”Global Environmental Change19397–399.
20.
CastreeN, 2003, “Commodifying what nature?”Progress in Human Geography27273–297.
21.
CastreeN, 2008, “Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation”Environment and Planning A40131–152.
22.
CastreeN, 2009, “Researching neoliberal environmental governance: A Reply to Karen Bakker”Environment and Planning A411788–1794.
23.
CollierG A, 1976, “Planos de Interacción del Mundo Tzotzil”, Instituto Nacional Indigenista, Mexico City.
24.
CorberaE, 2005Interrogating Development in Carbon Forestry Activities: A Case Study from Mexico doctoral dissertation, School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
25.
CorberaEBroderickJ, 2009, “The expanding carbon markets: issues, perspectives, and the role of science”, Briefing Note 37, Tyndall Centre, Norwich.
26.
CorberaEKosoyNMartínez-TunaM, 2007a, “Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America”Global Environmental Change17365–380.
27.
CorberaEBrownKAdgerW N, 2007b, “The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services”Development and Change38587–613.
28.
CorberaEEstradaMBrownK, 2009a, “How do regulated and voluntary-offset schemes compare?”Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences625–50.
29.
CorberaEGonzález SoberanisCBrownK, 2009b, “Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme”Ecological Economics68743–761.
30.
de JongBTipperRMontoya-GomezG, 2000, “An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: Evidence from Southern Mexico”Ecological Economics33313–327.
31.
DTZ Pieda Consulting, 2000, “An evaluation study of FRP's Carbon Sequestration Project in Southern Mexico”, DTZ Pieda Consulting, Edinburgh.
32.
DuraiappahA K, 2006, “Markets for ecosystem services. A potential tool for multilateral environmental agreements”, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Manitoba.
33.
ErakerH, 2000, “CO2lonialism—Norwegian tree plantations, carbon credits and land conflicts in Uganda”, Norwatch, http://www.norwatch.no.
34.
GongYBullGBaylisK, 2010, “Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: The role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules”Ecological Economics691292–1302.
35.
GrandaP, 2005, “Carbon sink plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes: impacts of the Dutch FACE-PROFAFOR monoculture tree plantations' project on indigenous and peasant communities”, Acción Ecológica, Quito.
36.
HamiltonKBayonRTurnerGHigginsD, 2007, “State of the voluntary carbon market 2006: picking up steam”, Ecosystems Marketplace, The Katoomba Group, http://www.katoombagroup.org.
37.
HamiltonKSjardinMShapiroAMarcelloT, 2009, “Fortifying the foundation: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2009”, Ecosystem Marketplace, New Carbon Finance, http://www.newcarbonfinance.org.
38.
HartwickE, 1998, “Geographies of consumption: A Commodity-chain approach”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16423–437.
39.
HarveyD, 1996Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
40.
HumphreysD, 2006Logjam: Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance (Earthscan, London).
41.
JamesB, 2007, “Expanding the gap: How the rural property system exacerbates China's urban–rural gap”Columbia Journal of Asian Law20451–491.
42.
JindalR, 2010, “Livelihood impacts of payments for forest carbon services: Field evidence from Mozambique”, in Livelihoods in the REDD? Payments for Environmental Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change Eds TacconiLMahantySSuichH (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) chapter 8.
43.
Khamman District of Andhra Pradesh Project, 2009, “Reforestation of severely degraded landmass in Khammam District of Andhra Pradesh, India under ITC Social Forestry Project”, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn.
44.
KosoyNCorberaE, 2010, “Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism”Ecological Economics691228–1236.
45.
KungK-S J, 2000, “Common property rights and land reallocations in rural China: Evidence from a village survey”World Development28701–719.
46.
LeachMMearnsRScoonesI, 1999, “Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management”World Development27225–247.
47.
LivermanD, 2004, “Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94734–738.
48.
LohmannL, 2005, “Marketing and making carbon dumps: Commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation”Science as Culture14203–235.
49.
LohmannL (Ed.), 2006, “Carbon trading: a critical conversation on climate change privatisation and power”, Dag Hammarskjold Foundation, Uppsala.
50.
LohmannL, 2008, “Carbon trading, climate justice and the production of ignorance: Ten examples”Development51359–365.
51.
LohmannL, 2009, “Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit”Accounting, Organizations and Society34499–534.
52.
LovellHBulkeleyHLivermanD, 2009, “Carbon offsetting: Sustaining consumption?”Environment and Planning A412357–2379.
53.
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283.
54.
McKeanM A, 2000, “Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work?”, in People and Forests: Communities, Institutions and Governance Eds GibsonC CMcKeanM AOstromE (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 27–56.
55.
NeeffTAshfordLCalvertJDaveyCDurbinJEbelingJHereraTJanson-SmithTLazoBMountainRO'KeeffeSPanfilSThorburnNTuiteCWheelandMYoungS, 2009, “The forest carbon offsetting survey 2009”, Ecosecurities, London.
56.
NewellPPatersonM, 2009. “The politics of the carbon economy”, in The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey Ed. BoykoffM T (Routledge, London) pp 77–95.
57.
O'NeillJ, 2001, “Property, care, and environment”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19695–711.
58.
O'NeillJ, 2007Markets, Deliberation and Environment (Routledge, London).
59.
OstromESchlagerE, 1996, “The formation of property rights”, in Rights to Nature. Ecological, Economic, Cultural and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment Eds HannaSFolkemCMalerK G (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 127–156.
60.
Pearl River Basin Project, 2006, “Facilitating reforestation for Guangxi watershed management in Pearl River Basin”, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn.
61.
PeskettLHarkinZ, 2007, “Risk and responsibility in reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation”, Forestry Briefing 15, Overseas Development Institute, London.
62.
PrudhamS, 2008, “Commodification”, in A Companion to Environmental Geography Eds CastreeNDemerittDLivermanDRhoadesB (Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 123–142.
63.
RibotJ CPelusoN L, 2003, “A theory of access”Rural Sociology68153–181.
64.
RobertsonM M, 2000, “No net loss: Wetland restoration and the incomplete capitalization of nature”Antipode32463–493.
65.
RobertsonM M, 2004, “The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance”Geoforum35361–373.
66.
RoncoliCJostCPerezCMooreKBalloACisséSOuattaraK, 2007, “Carbon sequestration from common property resources: Lessons from community-based sustainable pasture management in north-central Mali”Agricultural Systems9497–109.
67.
SaundersL SHanbury-TenisonRSwingland IR, 2002, “Social capital from carbon property: Creating equity for indigenous people”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society3601763–1775.
68.
SikorTLundC, 2009, “Access and property: A Question of power and authority”Development and Change401–22.
69.
SilvaL C, 2002, “Las formas comunitarias de aprovechamiento de los arboles y arbustos de Rincón Chamula, Chiapas, Mexico”, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Mexico.
70.
SmithJScherrS, 2002, “Forest carbon and local livelihood: assessment of opportunities and policy recommendations”, OP 37, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
71.
SutterCParreñoJ C, 2007, “Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects”Climatic Change8475–90.
72.
ThomasSDarguschPHarrisonSHerbohnJ, 2009, “Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects?”Land Use Policy doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.002.
73.
TuerkAStreckCJohnsTPenaN, 2008, “The role of land-based offsets in emissions trading systems: key design aspects and considerations for linking”, WP Linking-2, Climate Strategies, Graz.
UnruhJ D, 1995, “Agroforestry, reforestry, and the carbon problem: The role of land and tree tenure”Interdisciplinary Science Reviews20215–227.
76.
UnruhJ D, 2008, “Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem”Global Environmental Change18700–707.
77.
VatnA, 2000, “The environment as a commodity”Environmental Values9493–509.
78.
von Benda-BeckmannFvon Benda-BeckmannKWiberM, 2006, “The properties of property”, in Changing Properties of Property Eds von Benda-BeckmannFvon Benda-BeckmannKWiberM (Berghahn, New York).
79.
World Bank, 2003, “BioCarbon Fund concept note”, Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC.
80.
WunderSAlbánM, 2008, “Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador”Ecological Economics65685–698.
81.
WunderSEngelSPagiolaS, 2008, “Taking stock: A Comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries”Ecological Economics65834–852.
