The emergence over the last 30–40 years of what is variously termed edge city, edgeless, and postsuburban development in North America and elsewhere raises a set of challenges for urban theory and existing ways of understanding the politics of urban growth and management. These challenges and their global import have been outlined in their broadest terms by members of a ‘Los Angeles School’. In this paper we try to develop the detail of some of these challenges in ways that might allow for comparative analysis. We begin by considering three analytical dimensions along which distinctively postsuburban settlements might be identified. These dimensions are not without their limitations but we regard them as a heuristic device around which to centre ongoing comparative research. We then go on to highlight three political contradictions attending postsuburban growth which appear to flow from some of these defining dimensions. To the extent that such postsuburban growth and politics are distinctive, they pose important challenges to established theories of urban politics. We briefly consider these challenges in the conclusion of the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlthubaityAJonasA, 1998, “Suburban entrepreneurialism: Redevelopment regimes and co-ordinating metropolitan development in Southern California”, in The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation Eds HallTHubbardP (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 149–172.
2.
BeauregardR, 2006a, “The radical break in late twentieth-century urbanization”Area38218–220.
3.
BeauregardR, 2006bWhen America Became Suburban (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
4.
BeckUBonssWLauC, 2003, “The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme”Theory, Culture and Society201–33.
5.
BogartW T, 2006Don't Call it Sprawl: Metropolitan Structure in the Twenty First Century (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
6.
BontjeMBurdackJ, 2005, “Edge cities, European-style: Examples from Paris and the Randstad”Cities22317–330.
7.
BrakeKDangschatJ SHerfertG (Eds), 2001Suburbanisierung in Deutschland—aktuelle Tendenzen (Leske und Budrich, Opladen).
8.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization, and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481.
9.
BrennerN, 2002, “Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: A critical overview”Cities193–21.
10.
BruegmannR, 2005Sprawl: A Compact History (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
11.
CastellsM, 1983The City and The Grass Roots (Edward Arnold, London).
12.
CharlesworthJCochraneA, 1994, “Tales of the suburbs: The local politics of growth in the South East of England”Urban Studies311723–1738.
13.
DearM, 2002 (Ed.) From Chicago to LA: Making Sense of Urban Theory (Sage, London).
14.
DearM, 2004, “The Los Angeles school of urbanism: An intellectual history”Urban Geography24493–509.
15.
DearMDahmannN, 2008, “Urban politics and the Los Angeles School of Urbanism”Urban Affairs Review44266–279.
16.
DearMFlustyS, 1998, “Postmodern urbanism”Annals of the Association of American Geographers8850–72.
17.
DearMShockmanH EHiseG (Eds), 1996Rethinking Los Angeles (Sage, London).
18.
DickH WRimmerP J, 1998, “Beyond the third world city: The new urban geography of Southeast Asia”Urban Studies352303–2321.
EssexS JBrownG P, 1997, “The emergence of postsuburban landscapes on the north coast of New South Wales: A case study of contested space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21259–285.
21.
FishmanR, 1987Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia (Basic Books, New York).
22.
FishmanR, 1991, “The garden city tradition in the postsuburban age”Built Environment17232–241.
23.
GarreauJ, 1991Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York).
24.
GottdienerM, 1977Planned Sprawl: Private and Public Interests in Suburbia (Sage, London).
25.
GottdienerMKephartG, 1995, “The multinucleated region: A comparative analysis”, in Postsuburban California: The Transformation of Orange County Since World War Two Eds KlingROlinSPosterM (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 31–54.
HarrisRLewisR, 1998, “Constructing a fault(y) zone: Misrepresentations of American cities and suburbs, 1900–1950”Annals of the Association of American Geographers88622–639.
29.
HarveyD, 1985The Urbanisation of Capital (Blackwell, Oxford).
30.
HaydenD, 2003Building Suburbia: Greenfields and Urban Growth, 1820–2000 (Pantheon, New York).
31.
HiseG, 1997Magnetic Los Angeles: Planning the Twentieth Century Metropolis (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
32.
HoganR, 2003The Failure of Planning: Permitting Sprawl in San Diego Suburbs, 1970–1999 (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH).
33.
JonasAEGPincetlS, 2006, “Rescaling regions in the state: The new regionalism in California”Political Geography25482–505.
34.
KeilR, 1994, “Global sprawl: Urban form after Fordism?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12131–136.
35.
KeilR, 2000, “Governance restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or secession”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24758–781.
36.
KeilRRonnebergerK, 1994, “Going up the country: Internationalization and urbanization on Frankfurt's northern fringe”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12137–166.
37.
KlingROlinSPosterM, 1995, “The emergence of postsuburbia: An introduction”, in Postsuburban California: The Transformation of Orange County Since World War Two Eds KlingROlinSPosterM (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 1–30.
38.
KraemerC, 2005, “Commuter belt turbulence in a dynamic region: The case of the Munich city-region”, in The City's Hinterland: Dynamism and Divergence in Europe's Peri-urban Territories Ed. HoggartK (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 41–68.
LaquianA A, 2005Beyond Metropolis: The Planning and Governance of Asia's Mega-urban Regions (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC).
41.
LarkhamP, 2006, “The study of urban form in Great Britain”Urban Morphology10117–150.
42.
LeontidouLAfouxenidisAKourliourosEMarmarasE, 2007, “Infrastructure related urban sprawl: Mega-events and hybrid peri-urban landscapes in Southern Europe”, in Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, Land-use Change and Policy Eds CouchCLeontidouLPetschel-HeldG (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 71–101.
43.
LörzingH, 2006, “Reinventing suburbia in the Netherlands”Built Environment32298–310.
44.
LucyW HPhilipsD L, 1997, “The postsuburban era comes to Richmond: City decline, suburban transition and exurban growth”Landscape and Urban Planning36259–275.
45.
McGeeT, 1991, “The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis”, in The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia Eds GinsborgNKoppelBMcGeeT (University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI) pp 3–25.
46.
McManusREthingtonP J, 2007, “Suburbs in transition: New approaches to suburban history”Urban History34317–337.
47.
MarshallS, 2006, “The emerging ‘silicon savanna’: From old urbanism to new suburbanism”Built Environment32267–280.
48.
MassottiL H, 1973, “Prologue: Suburbia reconsidered—myth and counter-myth”, in The Urbanization of the Suburbs Eds MasottiL HHaddenJ K (Sage, London) pp 15–22.
49.
MazierskaERascaroliL, 2003From Moscow to Madrid: Postmodern Cities, European Cinema (I B Tauris, London).
50.
MolotchH, 1976, “City as a growth machine—toward a political-economy of place”American Journal of Sociology82309–322.
51.
MullerP, 1981Contemporary Suburban America (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
52.
MussoJ, 2004, “Metropolitan fiscal structure: Coping with growth and fiscal constraint”, in Up Against The Sprawl: Public Policy and the Making of Southern California Eds WolchJPastorMDrierP (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 171–194.
53.
NeumanM, 1997, “Images as institution builders: Metropolitan planning in Madrid”, in Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe Eds HealeyPKhakeeAMotteANeedhamB (UCL Press, London) pp 75–91.
54.
NichollsW J, 2006, “Power to the periphery: Suburban empowerment in Toulouse, France”Environment and Planning A381715–1737.
55.
NuisslHRinkD, 2005, “The ‘production’ of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transition”Cities22123–134.
56.
OldsK, 2001Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-projects (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
57.
OrfieldM, 1997Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
58.
PerskyJWiewelW, 2000When Corporations Leave Town: The Costs and Benefits of Metropolitan Job Sprawl (Wayne State University, Detroit, MI).
59.
PhelpsN AParsonsN, 2003, “Edge urban geographies: Notes from the margins of Europe's capital cities”Urban Studies401725–1749.
60.
PhelpsN AParsonsNBallasDDowlingA, 2006aPost-suburban Europe: Planning and Politics at the Margins of Europe's Capital Cities (Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
61.
PhelpsN AParsonsNBallasDDowlingA, 2006b, “Business at the margins? Business interests in urban politics”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32362–383.
62.
RomeA, 2001The Bulldozer in the Countryside: Suburban Sprawl and the Rise of American Environmentalism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
63.
SaundersP, 1979Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation (Hutchinson, London).
64.
ScottA JRoweisS J, 1977, “Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal”Environment and Planning A91097–1119.
65.
SellersJ, 2005, “Re-placing the nation: An agenda for comparative urban politics”Urban Affairs Review40419–445.
66.
SievertsT, 2003Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt (Routledge, London).
67.
SilvermanASchneiderL, 1991, “Suburban localism and Long Island's regional crisis”Built Environment17191–204.
68.
SklairL, 2005, “The transnational capitalist class and contemporary architecture in global cities”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29484–500.
TeafordJ, 1997Post-suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
72.
VaattovaaraMKortteinenM, 2003, “Beyond polarisation versus professionalisation? A case study of the development of the Helsinki region, Finland”Urban Studies402127–2145.
73.
WalkerR, 1981, “A theory of suburbanization: Capitalism and the construction of urban space in the US”, in Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Societies Eds DearMScottA (Methuen, London) pp 383–429.
74.
WalkerRLewisR D, 2001, “Beyond the crabgrass frontier: Industry and the spread of North American cities, 1850–1950”Journal of Historical Geography273–19.
75.
WheelerS M, 2008, “The evolution of built landscapes in metropolitan regions”Journal of Planning Education and Research27400–416.
76.
WhileAJonasAEGGibbsD C, 2004, “Unblocking the city? Growth pressures, collective provision, and the search for new spaces of governance in Greater Cambridge, England”Environment and Planning A36279–304.
77.
WhitehandJWRCarrCMH, 2001Twentieth Century Suburbs: A Morphological Approach (Routledge, London).
78.
WolchJPastorMDrierP, 2004, “Introduction: Making southern California—public policy, markets, and the dynamics of growth”, in Up Against The Sprawl: Public Policy and the Making of Southern California Eds WolchJPastorMDrierP (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 1–23.
79.
WoodA, 2004, “The scalar transformation of the US commercial property-development industry: A cautionary note on the limits of globalization”Economic Geography80119–140.
80.
ZhangJ XWuF, 2006, “China's changing economic governance: Administrative annexation and the reorganization of local government in the Yangtze river delta”Regional Studies403–21.
