The ‘ideal deliberative procedure’ provides structure to the process of stakeholder deliberation, yet creates a tension with the formal processes of strategic plan-making. This paper examines process design by drawing upon communicative planning theory, and the rational comprehensive model and deliberative democracy literature. In the context of metropolitan strategic spatial plan-making, the aim of this paper is to examine how the knowledge interface between the process of stakeholder engagement and the process of plan-making enables or inhibits implementation of the plan. A retrospective study examining the development of two metropolitan strategic spatial plans: Greater Perth's the Network City plan and Greater Vancouver's the Livable Region Strategic Plan is provided. It is revealed that the engagement of the planners, the public and the politicians occurs within formal stakeholder engagement ‘events’ positioned at different stages of the plan-making process. This paper reveals that the deliberation among the professional planners and the politicians at the process design stage steers the plan-making process in a manner that retains its legitimacy and creates a more implementable plan.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtsL, 2001, “How to proceed from image and discourse to action: As applied to the Flemish Diamond”Urban Studies38733–745.
2.
AlbrechtsL, 2002, “The planning community reflects in enhancing public involvement: Views from academics and reflective practitioners”Planning Theory and Practice3331–347.
3.
AlbrechtsL, 2003, “Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21905–924.
4.
AlbrechtsL, 2004, “Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31743–758.
5.
AlbrechtsL, 2005, “Creativity as a driver for change”Planning Theory4247–269.
6.
AlbrechtsL, 2006, “Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia”Environment and Planning A381149–1170.
7.
AminACohendetP, 2004Architecture of Knowledge: Forms, Capabilities and Communities (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
8.
BanfieldE, 1973, “Ends and means in planning”, in A Reader in Planning Theory Ed. FaludiA (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 139–149.
9.
BanisterD, 2005Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century (Routledge, New York).
10.
BarrettSFudgeC, 1981, “Examining the policy–action relationship”, in Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy Eds BarrettSFudgeC (Methuen, London) pp 3–32.
11.
BarryJ, 1999Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress (Sage, London).
12.
BeauregardR A, 2005, “Introduction: Institutional transformations”Planning Theory4203–207.
13.
BerkeP, 2002, “Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century”Journal of Planning Literature1221–36.
14.
CameronK, 1996, “Regional districts in British Columbia”Plan Canada3616–17.
15.
CohenJ, 1989, “Deliberation and democratic legitimacy”, in The Good Polity: Normative Analysis and the State Eds HamlinAPettitP (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 17–34.
16.
CohenJ, 1997, “Deliberation and democratic legitimacy”, in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics Eds BohmanJRehgW (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 67–91.
17.
CohenJ, 2003, “Deliberation and democratic legitimacy”, in Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy Eds MatraversDPikeJ E (Routledge, London) pp 342–360.
18.
CurtisCPerkinsT, 2006, “Can network city deliver a sustainable urban future?”The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability2(3) 87–94.
19.
DodsonJGleesonB, 2002, “Regional planning governance: a select review of Australian and international experience”, RP 10, Urban Frontiers Program, University of Western Sydney.
20.
DPI, 2003a, “Dialogue with the City: Working Together to Make Perth the World's Most Livable City—Issues Paper”, Department of Planning and Infrastructure, Perth.
21.
DPI, 2003b, “Dialogue with the City Local Government Workshop: Workshop Outcomes Report”, Department of Planning and Infrastructure, Perth.
22.
DryzekJ, 1987Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
23.
DryzekJ, 1990Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
24.
EckersleyR, 2000, “Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk: Towards a democracy of the affected”, in Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association Ed. SawardM (Routledge, London) pp 117–132.
25.
EckersleyR, 2004The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty (MIT Press, London).
26.
FaludiA, 1973Planning Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
27.
FaludiA, 2000, “The performance of spatial planning”Planning Practice and Research15299–318.
28.
FishkinJ, 1995The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
ForesterJ, 2007, “No longer muddling through: Institutional norms fostering dialogue, getting the facts, and encouraging mediated negotiations”, in Institutions and Planning Ed. VermaN (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 91–106.
31.
FriedmanW, 2006, “Deliberative democracy and the problem of scope”Journal of Public Deliberation2(1) 1–29.
32.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
33.
GallopG, 2003, “Dialogue with the City Community Consultation Forum”, Government of Western Australia, Fremantle.
34.
GertlerM S, 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there)”Journal of Economic Geography375–99.
35.
GleesonBDarbasTLawsonS, 2004, “Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies: A Socio-theoretic analysis”Urban Policy and Research22345–366.
36.
GoodinRDryzekJ, 2006, “Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics”Politics and Society34219–244.
37.
Government Media Office, 2001, “Government overhauls Western Australia's planning framework”, ministerial media statements, Government of Western Australia, Perth.
GutmannAThompsonD, 2004Why Deliberative Democracy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
40.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1989Livable Region Strategy Revitalization Program staff report, Vancouver.
41.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1990Choosing Our Future: Regional Challenge Seminars Presentations and Summary NotesDevelopment Services Department, Vancouver.
42.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1992, “Councilors discuss two billion dollar price tag for regional services at first-ever Council of Councils meeting”, news release, Vancouver.
43.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1994Creating Our Future: The History, Status, and Prospects of Regional Planning in Greater Vancouver Burnaby.
44.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1996aLivable Region Strategic Plan Burnaby.
45.
GVRD, Greater Vancouver Regional District 1996bEstablishing a Regional Strategic Plan: A Review of the Process: Strategic Planning Department Burnaby.
46.
HabermasJ, 1990Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
47.
HabermasJ, 1996, “Three normative models of democracy”, in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political Ed. BenhabibS (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 21–30.
48.
HarcourtMCameronKRossiterS, 2007City Making in Paradise: Nine Decisions that Saved Vancouver (Douglas and MacIntyre, Vancouver).
49.
Hartz-KarpJ, 2005, “A case study in deliberative democracy: Dialogue with the city”Journal of Public Deliberation1(1) 1–15.
50.
HealeyP, 1997Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Macmillan, London).
51.
HealeyP, 1999, “Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places”Journal of Planning Education and Research19111–121.
52.
HealeyP, 2003, “Collaborative planning in perspective”Planning Theory2101–123.
53.
HealeyP, 2004, “The treatment of the space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2845–67.
54.
HealeyP, 2006Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies2nd edition (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).
55.
HealeyP, 2007Urban Complexities and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times (Routledge, London).
56.
HopkinsD, 2008Communicate, Participate, or Deliberate? Deliberative Democracy as an Alternative Approach to Urban Planning in Contested Decision-making Environments: A Case Study of the Western Australian Government's ‘Dialogue with the City’ PhD dissertation, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
57.
HostovskyC, 2006, “The paradox of the rational comprehensive model of planning: Tales from waste management planning in Ontario, Canada”Journal of Planning Education and Research25382–395.
58.
InnesJ E, 2004, “Consensus building: Clarification for the critics”Planning Theory3(5) 5–20.
59.
LashH, 1976Planning in a Human Way: Personal Reflections on the Regional Planning Experience in Greater VancouverThe Ministry of State for Urban Affairs, Vancouver.
60.
LindblomC, 1973, “The science of ‘muddling through”’, in A Reader in Planning Theory Ed. FaludiA (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 151–169.
61.
LindblomCCohenD, 1979Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving (Yale University Press, London).
62.
Local Government Act, 1996Planning and Land Use Management—Part 26 chapter 323 (Queen's Printer, Victoria).
63.
LowN, 1991Planning, Politics and the State: Political Foundations of Planning Thought (Unwin Hyman, London).
64.
MarchALowN, 2004, “Knowing and steering: Mediatization, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia”Planning Theory3(1) 41–69.
65.
MeligranaJ, 1999, “Toward region transportation governance: A Case study of Greater Vancouver”Transportation26359–380.
MorcolG, 2006, “Decision making: An overview of theories, contexts, and methods”, in Handbook of Decision Making Ed. MorcolG (Taylor Francis, London) pp 3–18.
68.
NonakaI, 1994, “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”Organization Science5(1) 14–37.
69.
OwensS, 1995, “From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’: Pricing and planning in transport policy”Transport Policy2(1) 43–49.
70.
ParkinsonJ, 2006Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press, New York).
71.
ParkinsonJ, 2007, “Localism and deliberative democracy”The Good Society16(1) 23–29.
72.
PhelpsNTewdwr-JonesM, 2000, “Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building”Environment and Planning A32111–130.
73.
PolanyiM, 1958Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
74.
PolanyiM, 1966The Tacit Dimension (Doubleday, New York).
75.
ReedE S, 1996The Necessity of Experience (Yale University Press, London).
76.
RydinY, 2007, “Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory”Planning Theory652–68.
77.
SanyalB, 2005, “Planning as anticipation of resistance”Planning Theory4225–245.
78.
SchönD, 1983The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books, New York).
79.
SelmanP, 1999, “Three decades of environmental planning: What have we really learned?”, in Planning Sustainability Eds KennyMMeadowcroftJ (Routledge, London) pp 148–174.
80.
SmithG, 2001, “Taking deliberation seriously: Institutional design and green politics”Environmental Politics10(3) 72–93.
81.
SmithG, 2003Deliberative Democracy and the Green Political Theory (Routledge, London).
82.
TaylorN, 1998Urban Planning Theory Since 1945 (Sage, London).
83.
TomaltyR, 2002, “Growth management in the Vancouver Region”Local Environment7431–445.
84.
TurcotteM, 2005The Time it Takes to Get to Work and Back (Statistics Canada, Ottawa).
85.
WAPC, Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth2003Terms of Reference for Dialogue Implementation Team.
86.
WAPC, Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth2004aNetwork City: Community Planning Strategy for Perth and Peel.
87.
WAPC, Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth2004bDialogue with the City Communities Program: Round 1 Application.
88.
WAPC, Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth2009Directions 2031: A Draft Spatial Framework for Perth and Peel.
89.
YoungI M, 1997, “Difference as a resource for democratic communication”, in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics Eds BohmanJRehgW (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 383–406.
90.
YoungI M, 2000Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
