An exclusive focus on external forces risks the production of an overgeneralized account of a ubiquitous neoliberalism, which insufficiently accounts for the profusion of local variations that currently comprise the neoliberal project as a series of articulations with existing political economic circumstances. Although the international financial institutions initially promoted neoliberal economics in the global South, powerful elites were happy to oblige. Neoliberalism frequently reveals opportunities for well-connected officials to informally control market and material rewards, allowing them to line their own pockets. It is in this sense of the local appropriation of neoliberal ideas that scholars must go beyond conceiving of ‘neoliberalism in general’ as a singular and fully realized policy regime, ideological form, or regulatory framework, and work towards conceiving a plurality of ‘actually existing neoliberalisms' with particular characteristics arising from mutable geohistorical outcomes embedded within national, regional, and local process of market-driven sociospatial transformation. What constitutes ‘actually existing’ neoliberalism in Cambodia as distinctly Cambodian is the ways in which the patronage system has allowed local elites to co-opt, transform, and (re)articulate neoliberal reforms through a framework which asset strips public resources, thereby increasing people's exposure to corruption, coercion, and violence. It is to such an ‘articulation agenda’ that I attend to here as, in seeking to provide a more nuanced reading to recent work on neoliberalism in Cambodia by outlining some of its salient characteristics, a more empirical basis to theorizations of ‘articulated neoliberalism’ is revealed.
HarveyD, 2005A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
22.
HaymanA, 2007, “The rich, the poor and the income gap”Phnom Penh Post 1–14 June, pages 1, 8–9.
23.
HughesC, 2003The Political Economy of Cambodia's Transition, 1991–2001 (RoutledgeCurzon, London).
24.
HughesC, 2007, “Transnational networks, international organizations and political participation in Cambodia: Human rights, labour rights and common rights”Democratization14834–852.
25.
HughesC, 2009Dependent Communities: Aid and Politics in Cambodia and East TimorCornell Southeast Asia Program, Ithaca, NY.
MussomeliJ A, 2007, Remarks by Ambassador Joseph A Mussomeli, Reception for Cambodia Investment, Trade and Infrastructure Business Roundtable, US Ambassador speech, http://cambodia.usembassy.gov/sp_110707b.html.
41.
OwenTKiernanB, 2006, “Bombs over Cambodia”The Walrus (October) 62–69.
42.
PeckJ, 2001, “Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes”Progress in Human Geography25445–455.
RenoW, 1995Corruption and State Politics in Sierra Leone (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
49.
SaingSoenthrithYunSamean, 2004, “Hun Sen says opposition plans revolt”The Cambodia Daily 19 July, pages 1–2.
50.
SamRithPoyntonD, 2007, “Judicial reform 2007: An iron fist gone limp”Phnom Penh Post 26 January–8 February, pages 1, 11.
51.
SlocombM, 2010An Economic History of Cambodia in the Twentieth Century (NUS Press, Singapore).
52.
SmithA, 2007, “Articulating neoliberalism: Diverse economies and everyday life in postcolonial cities”, in Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers Eds LeitnerHPeckJSheppardE S (Guilford Press, New York) pp 204–222.
53.
SneddonC, 2007, “Nature's materiality and the circuitous paths of accumulation: Dispossession of freshwater fisheries in Cambodia”Antipode39167–193.
54.
SpringerS, 2009a, Culture of violence or violent Orientalism? Neoliberalisation and imagining the ‘savage other’ in posttransitional Cambodia”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series34305–319.
55.
SpringerS, 2009b, “Violence, democracy, and the neoliberal ‘order’: The contestation of space in post-transitional Cambodia”Annals of the Association of American Geographers99138–162.
56.
SpringerS, 2010aCambodia's Neoliberal Order: Violence, Authoritarianism, and the Contestation of Public Space (Routledge, London).
57.
SpringerS, 2010b, “Neoliberal discursive formations: On the contours of subjectivation, good governance, and symbolic violence in posttransitional Cambodia”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28931–950.
58.
SpringerS, 2010c, “Neoliberalism and geography: Expansions variegations, formations”Geography Compass41025–1038.
59.
SpringerS, forthcoming, “Violent accumulation: A postanarchist critique of property, dispossession, and the state of exception in neoliberalizing Cambodia”Annals of the Association of American Geographers doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.628259.
UnKSoS, 2009, “Politics of natural resource use in Cambodia”Asian Affairs36123–138.
63.
UvinP, 2003, “Global dreams and local anger: From structural to acute violence in a globalizing world”, in Rethinking Global Political Economy: Emerging Issues, Unfolding Odysseys Eds TetreaultM ADenemarkR AThomasK PBurchK (Routledge, London) pp 147–161.
64.
WacquantL, 2001, “The penalisation of poverty and the rise of neo-liberalism”European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research9401–412.
65.
WassonEYunSamean, 2006, “Council of Ministers approves sub-decree to manage state land”The Cambodia Daily 13 December, page 16.
