How do seaports evolve in relation to each other? Recent studies in port economics and transport geography have been focused on how supply-chain integration has structurally changed the competitive landscape in which individual ports and port actors operate. Port regionalization has been addressed as the corresponding new phase in the spatial and functional evolution of port systems. However, these studies lack theoretical foundations that allow us to assess empirically the role either of the institutional context or of strategic agency in the competitive (spatial and functional) evolution of regional (integrated) port systems. The authors present an evolutionary framework to analyze the development of seaports in a regional context by making use of the concept of ‘windows of opportunity’. The role of seaport-based evolution in the processes aimed at positioning market players and ports on the container scene in the Rhine–Scheldt Delta is examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ, 2004, “The whereabouts of power: Politics, government and space”Geografiska Annaler B8619–32
2.
AminA, 2001, “Moving on: Institutionalism in economic geography”Environment and Planning A331237–1241
3.
BarkeM, 1986Transport and TradeOliver and Boyd, Edinburgh
4.
BatheltHGluecklerJ, 2003, “Towards a relational economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography3117–144
5.
BoschmaRA, 1997, “New industries and windows of locational opportunity. A long term analysis of Belgium”Erdkunde5112–22
6.
BoschmaRAFrenkenK, 2006, “Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography6273–302
7.
BoschmaRAFrenkenK, 2009, “Some notes on institutions in evolutinary economic geography”Economic Geography85151–158
8.
BoschmaRALambooyJ, 1999, “Evolutionary economics and economic geography”Journal of Evolutionary Economics9411–429
9.
BoschmaRAMartinR, 2010, “The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography”, in Handbook on Evolutionary Economic Geography Eds BoschmaRAMartinR (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 3–39
10.
BuitelaarELagendijkAJacobsW, 2007, “A theory of institutional change; illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy”Environment and Planning A39891–908
11.
CoeN, 2011, “Geographies of production I: An evolutionary revolution?”Progress in Human Geography3581–91
12.
DickenPKellyPFOldsKYeungHW-C, 2001, “Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy”Global Networks189–112
FeenstraRC, 1998, “Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy”Journal of Economic Perspectives1231–50
15.
GrabherG, 2009, “Yet another turn? The evolutionary project in economic geography”Economic Geography85119–127
16.
HallPV, 2003, “Regional institutional convergence? Reflections from the Baltimore waterfront”Economic Geography79347–363
17.
HallPVJacobsW, 2010, “Shifting proximities: The maritime ports sector in the era of global supply chains”Regional Studies441103–1115
18.
HallPVHesseMRodrigueJP, 2006, “Guest editorial: Reexploring the interface between economic and transport geography”Environment and Planning A381401–1408
19.
HayuthY, 1981, “Containerization and the load center concept”Economic Geography57160–176
20.
HeaverT, 1995, “The implications of increased competition among ports for port policy and management”Maritime Policy and Management22125–133
21.
JacobsW, 2007, “Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach: An institutional analysis”Tijdschrift voor de Economische en Sociale Geografie98360–372
22.
JacobsWHallPV, 2007, “What conditions the supply chain strategies of ports? The case of Dubai”GeoJournal68327–342
23.
KingdonJW, 1995Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (Harper-Collins, New York)
24.
LevinsonM, 2006The Box. How the Shipping Container made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
25.
MackinnonDCumbersAPikeABirchKMcCasterR, 2009, “Evolution in economic geography; institutions, political economy, and adaptation”Economic Geography85129–150
26.
MagalaMSammonsA, 2008, “A new approach to port choice modeling”Maritime Economics and Logistics109–34
27.
MartinR, 2000, “Institutional approaches in economic geography”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds SheppardEBarnesT (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 77–94
28.
MartinRSunleyP, 2007, “Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography7573–601
29.
NoordaR, 1993, “Co-opetition”Electronic Business Buyer December pp 8–12
30.
NotteboomT, 2002, “Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry”Maritime Policy and Management29257–269
31.
NotteboomT, 2007, “Concession agreements as port governance tools”Research in Transportation Economics17437–455
32.
NotteboomT, 2009a, “Path dependency and contingency in the development of multi-port gateway regions and multi-port hub regions”, in Ports in Proximity: Competition and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports Eds NotteboomTDucruetCDe LangenP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 55–74
33.
NotteboomT, 2009b, “Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports”Environment and Planning A41743–762
34.
NotteboomT, 2010, “Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: An update”Journal of Transport Geography18567–583
35.
NotteboomTRodrigueJP, 2005, “Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development”Maritime Policy and Management32297–313
36.
NotteboomTWinkelmansW, 2001, “Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge?”Maritime Policy and Management2871–89
37.
OlivierD, 2005, “Private entry and emerging partnerships in the container terminal industry: Evidence from Asia”Maritime Economics and Logistics7 (2) 87–115
38.
OlivierDParolaFSlackBWangJJ, 2007, “The time scale of internationalisation: The case of the container port industry”Maritime Economics and Logistics91–34
39.
PikeABirchKCumbersAMackinnonDMcMasterR, 2009, A geographical political economy of evolution in economic geography”Economic Geography85175–182
40.
RigbyDLEssletzbichlerJ, 1997, “Evolution, process variety and regional trajectories of technological change in US manufacturing”Economic Geography73269–284
41.
RobinsonR, 2002, “Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm”Maritime Policy and Management29241–255
42.
SlackB, 1993, “Pawns in the game: Ports in a global transportation system”Growth and Change24579–588
43.
SlackBFrémontA, 2005, “Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global”Transport Reviews25117–130
44.
SlackBFrémontA, 2009, “Fifty years of organisational change in container shipping: Regional shift and the role of family firms”Geojournal7423–34
45.
SlackBComtoisCMcCallaR, 2002, “Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: A global perspective”Maritime Policy and Management2965–76
46.
SongDW, 2003, “Port co-opetition in concept and practice”Maritime Policy and Management3029–44
47.
SoppéMParolaFFrémontA, 2009, “Emerging inter-industry partnerships between shipping lines and stevedores: From rivalry to cooperation?”Journal of Transport Geography1710–20
StrambachS, 2010, “Path dependency and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation—the German customized business software industry”, in Handbook on Evolutionary Economic Geography Eds BoschmaRMartinR (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 406–431
50.
TaaffeEJMorrillRLGouldPR, 1963, “Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: A comparative analysis”Geographical Review53503–529
51.
TurnbullP, 2006, “The war on Europe's waterfront. Repertoires of power in the port transport industry”British Journal of Industrial Relations44305–326
52.
YeungHW-C, 2005, “Rethinking relational economic geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3037–51
