Being implicated in an ambivalent play of both border crossing and drawing, global commodity chains are an ideal organizational field to analyze the fundamental paradox of global connectivity. Approaching the contingency of borders from a perspective informed by the performativity approach to markets, this paper starts from the assumption that this paradox is particularly salient in the context of commodity chains which connect the Global South with the Global North. Taking the example of one single agrocommodity, the tomato, and two border regions (Morocco–EU and Mexico–USA), we follow the links and heterogeneous associations which stretch from the border to the fields, supermarket shelves, and standardization agencies to migrant labor, quality-control apparatuses, and so forth. By reading commodity chains from their literal limits, that is, from the border and from the margins, we focus on an element of this global assemblage which is normally taken for granted and excluded from academic and public discourse.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1994, “The territorial trap: the geographical assumption of international relations theory”Review of International Political Economy153–80
2.
AlouiOKennyL, 2005, “The cost of compliance with SPS standards for Moroccan exports: a case study”, Agriculture and Rural Development discussion paper, World Bank, Washington, DC
3.
Aznar SánchezJ Á, 2004, “El sistema de comercialización y exportación de las hortalizas marroquíes”Distribución y Consumo number 78, 89–100
4.
BairJ, 2009, “Global commodity chains: genealogy and review”, in Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research Ed. BairJ (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 1–34
5.
BarndtD, 2002Tangled Routes: Women, Work, and Globalization on the Tomato Trail (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
6.
BarnesT, 2008, “Making space for the economy: live performances, dead objects, and economic geography”Geography Compass21432–1448
7.
BartelsJ, 2004Terres Collectives. Kollektiveigentum in Marokko (Logos, Berlin)
BeckU, 2002Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
10.
BeckUBonßWLauC, 2004, “Entgrenzung erzwingt Entscheidung: was ist neu an der Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung”, in Entgrenzung und Entscheidung: Was ist neu an der Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung? Eds BeckULauC (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main) pp 13–62
11.
BerndtC, 2004Globalisierungs-Grenzen: Modernisierungsträume und Lebenswirklichkeiten in Nordmexiko (Transcript, Bielefeld)
12.
BerndtCBoecklerM, 2009, “Geographies of circulation and exchange: constructions of markets”Progress in Human Geography33535–551
13.
BhagwatiJGreenawayDPanagariyaA, 1998, “Trading preferentially: theory and policy”Economic Journal1081128–1148
14.
BrunkeHSumnerD A, 2002, “Assessing the role of Nafta in California agriculture: a review of trends and economic relationships”, Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis, CA
15.
BuschL, 2007, “Performing the economy, performing science: from neoclassical to supply chain models in the agrifood sector”Economy and Society36437–466
16.
CaliskanKCallonM, 2010, “Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets”Economy and Society391–32
17.
CallonM, 1998, “An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology”, in The Laws of the Markets Ed. CallonM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 244–269
18.
CallonM, 2007, “What does it mean to say that economics is performative?”, in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics Eds MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 311–357
19.
CallonMLawJ, 2005, “On qualculation, agency, and otherness”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23717–733
20.
CallonMMéadelCRabeharisoaV, 2002, “The economy of qualities”Economy and Society31194–217
ChemnitzCGretheH, 2006, “Handelspräferenzen der EU für Tomaten aus Marokko—wer profitiert?”, in Unternehmen im Agrarbereich vor neuen Herausforderungen Eds BahrsEv Cramon-TaubadelSSpillerATheuvsenLZellerM (Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster-Hiltrup) pp 207–220
24.
Commission of the European Communities, 2000, Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2000 of 14 April 2000 laying down the marketing standard for tomatoes, 15 April 2000
25.
CookI, 2004, “Follow the thing: papaya”Antipode36642–664
26.
CookRCalvinL, 2005Greenhouse Tomatoes Change the Dynamics of the North American Fresh Tomato IndustryUnited States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
27.
CroxtonK LGarcía-DastugueS JLambertD MRogersD S, 2001, “The supply chain management processes”The International Journal of Logistics Management1213–36
28.
de Pablo ValencianoJPérez MesaJ C, 2004, “The competitiveness of Spanish tomato export in the European Union”Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research2167–180
29.
EchanoveF, 2005, “Globalisation and restructuring in rural Mexico: the case of fruit growers”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9615–30
EuskirchenMLebuhnHRayG, 2007, “From borderline to borderland: the changing European border regime”Monthly Review5942–53
32.
EvansDKaplinskyRRobinsonS, 2006, “Deep and shallow integration in Asia: towards a holistic account”Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies3712–22
33.
FAO, 2009Agricultural Trade Statisticshttp://faostat.fao.org, various enquiries in October 2009
34.
Fernández-Rufete GómezJRico BecerraJ I, 2005, “Legale und illegale Zuwanderung in Spanien: Ecuadorianer in der Autonomen Gemeinschaft Murcia”IMIS-Beiträge2789–107
35.
Ferrer-GallardoX, 2008, “The Spanish-Moroccan border complex: processes of geopolitical, functional and symbolic rebordering”Political Geography27301–321
36.
FreidbergS E, 2001, “On the trail of the global green bean: methodological considerations in multi-site ethnography”Global Networks1353–368
37.
Garcia-ParpetM-F, 2007, “The social construction of a perfect market: the strawberry auction at Fontaines-en-Sologne”, in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics Eds MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 20–53
HackingI, 1983Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
44.
HandfieldR BNicholsE L, 1999Introduction to Supply Chain Management (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
45.
HendersonJDickenPHessMCoeNYeungHW-C, 2002, “Global production networks and the analysis of economic development”Review of International Political Economy9436–464
46.
HoeringU, 2005, “Wasser für Nahrung—Wasser für Profit: die Politik der Weltbank im landwirtschaftlichen Sektor”, Menschenrecht Wasser—Hintergrundmaterialien 15, Brot für die Welt, Stuttgart
47.
HopkinsT KWallersteinI, 2000 [1986], “Commodity chains in the world-economy prior to 1800”, in The Essential Wallerstein Ed. WallersteinI (The New Press, New York) pp 221–233
48.
HumphreyJSchmitzH, 2002, “How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?”Regional Studies361017–1027
49.
HutchinsE, 1995Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
JaffeeS MHensonS, 2004, “Agro-food exports from developing countries: the challenges posed by standards”, in Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries Eds AksoyM ABeghinJ C (The World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 91–115
52.
KearneyM, 1998, “Transnationalism in California and Mexico at the end of empire”, in Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers Eds WilsonT MDonnanH (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 117–141
53.
Lara FloresS M, 2008, “¿Es posible hablar de un trabajo decente en la agricultura moderno-empresarial en México?”El Cotidiano23 (147) 25–33
54.
LatourB, 1982, “Give me a laboratory and I will move the world”, in Science Observed Eds Knorr-CetinaKMulkayM J (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 141–170
55.
LatourB, 1988The Pasteurisation of France (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
56.
MaciasA, 2003, “Enclaves agricolas modernos: el caso del jitomate mexicano en los mercados internacionales”Region y Sociedad15103–151
57.
MacKenzieD, 2006, “Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets”Journal of the History of Economic Thought2829–55
58.
MacKenzieD A, 2009Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
59.
MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL, 2007Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
60.
MasseyD, 1999, “Philosophy and politics of spatiality: some considerations”Geographische Zeitschrift871–12
61.
MitchellD, 2001, “The geography of injustice: borders and the continuing immiseration of California agricultural labor in an era of ‘free trade’”Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business2145–166
62.
MitchellT, 2005, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”European Journal of Sociology45297–320
63.
MitchellT, 2007, “The properties of markets”, in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics Eds MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 244–275
64.
MitchellT, 2009, “How neoliberalism makes its world”, in The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective Eds MirowskiPPlehweD (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 386–416
65.
MolALawJ, 2005, “Boundary variations: an introduction”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23637–642
66.
MonsiváisC, 1998, “De la frontera y el centro. Encuentro de mitologías”, in Procesos Culturales del Fin de Milenio Ed. Valenzuela ArceJ M (Centro Cultural Tijuana, Tijuana) pp 167–182
67.
NadviK, 2008, “Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains”Journal of Economic Geography8323–343
68.
Pacheco CastroJ, 2004, “La tierra en el marco de la política económica neoliberal: confrontación de dos concepciones”El Cotidiano19 (124) 86–95
69.
SantosA CRodriguesJ, 2009, “Economics as social engineering? Questioning the performativity thesis”Cambridge Journal of Economics33985–1000
70.
ShadlenK, 2005, “Exchanging development for market access? Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreements”Review of International Political Economy12750–775
71.
ThielF, 2007, “Feeding a growing appetite for land—Landpolitik in Afrika”Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie443–16
72.
ThriftN, 2000, “Pandora's box? Cultural geographies of economies”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkGFeldmanMGertlerM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 689–704
73.
TornellAEsquivelG, 1998, “Political economy of Mexican membership in the North American Free Trade Agreement”El Trimestre Economico65427–468
74.
Traub-WernerM, 2007, “Free trade: a governmentality approach”Environment and Planning A391441–1456
75.
TroppDSkullyDLinkJMálagaJ, 2002Mexico's Changing Marketing System for Fresh Produce: Emerging Markets, Practices, Trends, and IssuesAgricultural Marketing Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
76.
TsingA, 2009, “Supply chains and the human condition”Rethinking Marxism21148–176
77.
UrryJ, 2000Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century (Routledge, London)
van HoutumHKramschOZierhoferW (Eds), 2005B/ordering Space (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
80.
VilaP, 2000Crossing Borders, Reinforcing Borders: Social Categories, Metaphors and Narrative Identities on the US-Mexico Frontier (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX)
81.
WallersteinI, 2009, “Protection networks and commodity chains in the capitalist world-economy”, in Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research Ed. BairJ (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 83–89
82.
WimmerAGlick SchillerN, 2002, “Methodological nationalism and the study of migration”Archives Européennes de Sociologie43217–240
83.
World Bank, 2001Producing and Marketing Horticultural Exports: Bank Lending in Mediterranean Countries (World Bank, Washington, DC)
