The paper explores the interconnections between legal and animal geographies as manifested in American zoos. On the one hand, law shapes not only the zoo's physical facilities, but also the very identity of zoo animals. On the other hand, the peculiarity of zoo animals—and of zoos as public spaces that display such animals—also translates into an anomalous state of zoo laws. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part demonstrates that, despite the numerous official laws that pertain to animals in various settings, exceptions and exemptions that apply to the zoo animal make it into an almost extralegal creature. The second part examines the laws that regulate the zoo's physical facilities, showing how—in this context too—the zoo is regulated mostly through variances and exceptions. The third part focuses on the zoo's self-regulating industry standards, arguing that they provide yet another reason for the peculiar legal state of zoos and their animals. Drawing on a set of interviews, conducted mostly with American zoo professionals, the paper explores the interstitial nature of law, space, and animals, offering a fresh perspective into, and a few interconnections between, the literatures of animal geography and law and geography.
AndersonK, 1995, “Culture and nature at the Adelaide zoo: At the frontiers of ‘human’ geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series20275–294
3.
Animal Protection, Education, and Information Foundation v. Friends of the Zoo for Springfield, Mo, Inc. (891 SW2d 177, 179 [Mo. Court of Appeals 1995])
BenbowS, 2000, “Zoos: Public places to view private lives”Journal of Popular Culture3313–23
8.
BergerJ, 1980, “Why look at animals?”, in About Looking Ed. BergerJ (Pantheon, New York) pp 2–28
9.
BishopR, 2004, “Journeys to the urban exotic: Embodiment and the zoo-going gaze”Humanities ResearchXI106–124
10.
BlomleyN, 2003, “From ‘what’ to ‘so what’: Law and geography in retrospect”, in Law and Geography, Volume 5 Eds HolderJHowardonC (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 17–33
Buffalo City Charter, Chapter XIII Charters and Ordinances, Buffalo Preservation Code, Article I § 337
20.
Building Code of New York State, 2007, Chapters 1–35
21.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–233
22.
CastreeNNashCBadmingtonNBraunBMurdochJWhatmoreS, 2004, “Mapping posthumanism: An exchange”Environment and Planning A361341–1363
23.
CITES, 1973Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species 1973, 27 UST 1087
ConleyM, 2009, “Caring for dolphins, otters, and octopuses: Speciesism in the regulation of zoos and aquariums”Animal Law151–23
26.
CrokeV, 1997The Modern Ark: The Story of Zoos Past, Present and Future (Charles Scribner, New York)
27.
SmithDarian E, 1999Bridging Divides: The Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity in the New Europe (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
28.
DaviesG, 2000, “Virtual animals in electronic zoos: The changing geographies of animal capture and display”, in Animal Spaces Beastly Spaces: New Geographies of Human – Animal Relations Eds PhiloCWilbertC (Routledge, London) pp 243–267
29.
DavisS, 1997Spectacular Nature: Corporate Culture and the Sea World Experience (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
30.
DelaneyD, 2003Law and Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
31.
DelaneyD, 2010The Spatial the Legal, and the Pragmatics of World-making: Nomospheric Negotiations (Routledge, New York)
32.
DonahueJTrumpE, 2006The Politics of Zoos: Exotic Animals and Their Protectors (Northern Illinois University, Press Dekalb, IL)
33.
DouglasM, 1966Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (Routledge, New York)
34.
DucklerG, 1997, “Toward a more appropriate jurisprudence regarding the legal status of zoos and zoo animals”Animal Law Journal361–72
35.
EmelJWilbertCWolchJ, 2002, “Animal geographies”Society and Animals10407–412
36.
Endangered Species Act, 1973, 16 USC 1532
37.
Endangered Species Act Regulations, 2004, 50 CFR 14
HansonE, 2002Animal Attractions: Nature on Display in American Zoos (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
46.
HolderJHarrisonC, 2003Law and Geography (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
47.
JasanoffS, 2005Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
48.
JonesO, 2000, “(Un)ethical geographies of human – non-human relations: Encounters, collectives and spaces”, in Animal Spaces, Beastly Spaces: New Geographies of Human – Animal Relations Eds PhiloCWilbertC (Routledge, London) pp 268–291
49.
Lacey Act1900, 16 USC 3371–3378
50.
MalamudR, 1998, Reading Zoos (New York University Press, New York)
51.
Marine Animal Protection Act, 1972, 16 USC 1361
52.
MullanRMarvinG, 1999 [1987] Zoo Culture (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
53.
OrwellG, 1996 [1946], Animal Farm (Penguin Group USA, New York)
54.
PaquetteN, no date, “The status of captive wild animals in the U.S.: An overview of the problems and the laws”, Born Free, USA, http://www.bornfreeusa.org
55.
PhiloCWilbertC (Eds), 2000Animal Spaces, Beastly Spaces: New Geographies of Human – Animal Relations (Routledge, London)
56.
PoundR, 1910, “The law on the books and the law in action”American Law Review4412–36
57.
Public Health Services Act1944 42 USC 201
58.
State v Bartee (894 SW2d 34 [TX Court of Appeals 1995])
59.
VehrsKL, 1996, “Summary of United States wildlife regulations applicable to zoos”, in Wild Animals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques Eds KleimanD GAllenM EThompsonK VLumpkinS (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) appendix 3
60.
WhatmoreS, 1999, “Rethinking the human in human geography”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyEAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 22–40
WillisS, 1999, “Looking at the zoo”The South Atlantic Quarterly98669–687
63.
WolchJ, 1998, “Zoopolis”, in Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in Nature – Culture Borderlands Eds WolchJEmelJ (Verso, New York) pp 119–138
64.
WolchJEmelJ (Eds), 1995, “Guest edited issue: Bringing the animals back in”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13631–760
