Flood maps play an increasingly prominent role in government strategies for flood-risk management. Maps are instruments not just for defining and communicating flood risks, but also for regulating them and for rationalizing the inevitable limits and failures of those controls. Drawing on policy document analysis, official statistics, and 66 key-informant interviews, this paper explores the institutional conflicts over the use of the Environment Agency (EA) Flood Map to support decision making by English local planning authorities (LPAs), whose local political mandate, statutory obligations, and professionalized planning culture put them at odds with the narrower bureaucratic imperative of the Agency to restrict developments at risk of flooding. The paper shows how the Flood Map was designed to standardize and script the planning process and ensure that LPA decisions were aligned with EA views about avoiding development in zones at risk of flooding without actually banning such development outright. But technologies are also shaped by their users, and so the paper documents how planners accommodated and resisted this technology of indirect rule. Their concerns about sterilizing areas depicted as being at risk of flooding and about the difficulties of actually using the Flood Map for speedy and defensible development-control decisions were crucial in its eventual replacement by a new decision-support technology, Strategic Flood Risk Assessments, which then led to the descripting of the Flood Map to influence a new set of users: the public. The paper closes with some wider reflections on the significance of the case for risk-based governance.
AkrichM, 1992, “The de-scription of technical objects”, in Shaping Technology—Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change Eds BijkerWLawJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 205224
2.
BergM, 1997Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-support Techniques and Medical Practices (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
3.
BickerstaffKSimmonsPPidgeonN, 2008, “Constructing responsibilities for risk: Negotiating citizen—state relationships”Environment and Planning A4013121330
4.
BrownJDameryS, 2002, “Managing flood risks in the UK: Towards an integration of social and technical perspectives”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series27412426
5.
ButlerCPidgeonN, 2011, “From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29533547
6.
ByePHornerM, 1998Easter 1998 Floods: Report by the Independent Review Team to the Board of the Environment Agency. Volume 1Environment Agency, Bristol
7.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation'”, in Power, Action and Belief Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196233
8.
CramptonJKrygierJ, 2006, “An introduction to critical cartography”ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Cartographies4(1) 1133
9.
CullingworthBNadinV, 2006Town and Country Planning in the UK14th edition (Routledge, London)
Defra, Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London2004Making Space for Water: Developing a New Government Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in Englandhttp://www.defra.gov.uk/
Defra/EA, 2009Land Use Planning—Assessing the Quality and Influence of Strategic Flood Risk Assessments (SFRAs) R&D Technical Report FD2610/TR Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, and Environment Agency, Bristol [Freedom of Information request]
16.
DemerittD, 1997, “Representing the ‘true’ St Croix: Knowledge and power in the partition of the northeast”William and Mary Quarterly54515548
17.
DemerittD, 2001, “Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature's limits in progressive-era USA”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19431459
18.
DemerittDNobertS, 2011, “Responding to early flood warning in the European Union”, in Forecasting, Warning, and Transnational Risks: Is Prevention Possible? Eds MeyerCDe FrancoC (Palgrave Macmillan, London) pp 127147
19.
DETR, 2001Planning Policy Guidance Note 25: Development and Flood Risk Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
EA, Environment Agency, Bristol2010Flood and Coastal Risk Management Risk Mapping Strategy: 2010–2015 [Freedom of Information request]
28.
EC, 2007, “Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks”Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL 2882734, 6 November (European Commission, Brussels)
29.
GlaserBGStraussAL, 1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ)
30.
HoggartKLeesLDaviesA, 2002Researching Human Geography (Edward Arnold, London)
JoergesB, 1999, “Do politics have artefacts?”Social Studies of Science29411432
34.
JohnsonCPriestS, 2008, “Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility?”Water Resources Development24513525
35.
KriegerK, 2011Putting Varieties of Risk-Based Governance into Institutional Context: The Case of Flood Management Regimes in Germany and England in the 1990s and 2000s PhD thesis, Department of Geography, King's College London
36.
LamplandMStarS (Eds), 2009Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
37.
LaneSLandströmCWhatmoreS, 2011, “Imagining flood futures: Risk assessment and management in practice”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A36917841806
38.
LCC, Lincolnshire County Council, 2007Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final report by JBA Consulting Ltd; available on request
39.
MajoneG, 1997, “From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance”Journal of Public Policy17139167
40.
MonmonierM, 1997Cartographies of Danger: Mapping Hazards in America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
41.
MoranM, 2003The British Regulatory State (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
42.
NAO, 2001Inland Flood Defence: Report by the Controller and Auditor General HC 299, Session 2000–2001, March, National Audit Office (The Stationery Office, London)
43.
NobleD, 1984Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
44.
PittM, 2008, Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods: An Independent Review by Sir Michael Pitt Final report, Cabinet Office (The Stationery Office, London)
45.
PorterJ, 2010The Extreme Flood Outline: Co-producing Flood Risk Mapping and Spatial Planning in England PhD thesis, Department of Geography, King's College London
46.
PorterT, 1994, “Making things quantitative”Science in Context7389407
47.
PorterT, 1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
48.
PowerM, 2004The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty (DEMOS, London)
49.
PriestSClarkMColcloughS, 2008Public Awareness of Flood Risk: The Role of Environment Agency Flood Map Economic and Social Research Council Final Report, RES-000-22-1710
50.
RichardsJWhiteICarterJ, 2008, “Local planning practice and flood risk management in England: Is there a collective implementation deficit?”Urban Environment21120
51.
RoseNMillerP, 1992, “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government”British Journal of Sociology43173205
52.
RothsteinHHuberMGaskellG, 2006, “A theory of risk colonization: The spiraling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk”Economy and Society3591112
53.
RTPI, 2006Draft PPS25: Development and Flood RiskRoyal Town and Planning Institute, London
54.
ScraseJSheateW, 2005, “Re-framing flood control in England and Wales”Environmental Values14113137
55.
SoaneESchubertIChallenorPLunnRNarendranSPollardS, 2010, “Flood perception and mitigation: The role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information”Environment and Planning A4230233038
56.
TimmermansSEpsteinS, 2010, “A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization”Annual Review of Sociology366989
57.
Water Act, 1973Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 37 (HMSO, London)
58.
Water Resources Act, 1991Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 57 (HMSO, London)
59.
WhiteG, 1942Human Adjustment to Flood: A Geographical Approach to the Flood Problem in the United States (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
60.
WhiteIRichardsJ, 2007, “Planning policy and flood risk: The translation of national guidance policy into local policy”Planning Practice and Research22513524
61.
WinnerL, 1986The Whale and the Reactor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
62.
WoodD, 2010Rethinking the Power of Maps (Guilford Press, New York)
63.
WynnP, 2005, “Development control and flood risk: Analysis of local planning authority and developer approaches to PPG25”Planning Practice and Research20241261
