Determinants of the Performance of Business Associations in Rural Settlements in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of Members' Satisfaction and Willingness-to-Pay for Association Survival
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2013
Determinants of the Performance of Business Associations in Rural Settlements in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of Members' Satisfaction and Willingness-to-Pay for Association Survival
Research into business associations indicates that many associations suffer from very high levels of inactive members and fail to deliver significant benefits to members. In order to improve provision, the objective of this paper is to understand the determinants that drive or limit performance of rural business associations. Previous research has focused on the ratio of perceived costs to benefits as informing the decision to remain a member. However, in small associations, membership may be more influenced by social norms than the logic of rational choice. Using measures of satisfaction and willingness to pay for association survival as in-group measures of performance this paper finds that (1) for small associations, group size is critical, (2) associations are valued higher in communities where trust is lower, (3) funding by public bodies may be counterproductive to long-term development aims, and (4) the degree of rurality is insignificant in explaining association performance.
AgrestiA, 2007An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition (John Wiley, New York)
2.
AttertonJ, 2007, “The ‘strength of weak ties’: Social networking by business owners in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland”Sociologia Ruralis47228–245
BalandJPlatteauJ, 1996Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
5.
BarneyJ, 1991, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”Journal of Management1799–120
6.
BennettR J, 1996a, “The logic of local business associations: An analysis of voluntary Chambers of Commerce”Journal of Public Policy15251–279
7.
BennettR J, 1996b, “Can transaction cost economics explain voluntary chambers of commerce”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics152654–680
8.
BennettR J, 1997, “Explaining the membership of voluntary local business associations: The example of British Chambers of Commerce”Regional Studies32503–514
9.
BennettR J, 1998, “Business associations and their potential contribution to the competitiveness of SMEs”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development10243–260
10.
BennettR J, 1999, “Explaining the membership of sectoral business associations”Environment and Planning A31877–898
11.
BennettR J, 2011Local Business Voice: The History of Chambers of Commerce in Britain, Ireland, and Revolutionary America 1760–2011 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
12.
BennettR JRamsdenM, 2007, “The contribution of business associations to SMEs: Strategy, bundling or reassurance”International Small Business Journal2549–76
13.
BennettR JRobsonP J A, 2001, “Exploring the market potential and bundling of business association services”Journal of Services Marketing15222–239
14.
BesserTMillerN, 2010, “Starting business networks: Benefits and barriers”International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business10224–240
15.
BoltonRLemanK, 1999, “A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction”Journal of Marketing Research36171–186
16.
BosworthG, 2010, “Commercial counterurbanisation: An emerging force in rural economic development”Environment and Planning A42966–981
BuchananJ, 1965, “An economic theory of clubs”Economica321–14
19.
BuchananJ, 1975, “The Samaritan's dilemma”, in Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory Ed. PhelpsE (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 71–85
20.
BurtR, 2005Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
21.
ColemanJ, 1988, “Social capital in the creation of human capital”American Journal of Sociology94 (supplement) 95–120
22.
CoombesMRaybouldS, 2001, “Public policy and population distribution: Developing appropriate indicators of settlement patterns”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19223–248
DillmanD, 2000Mail and Internet Surveys (John Wiley, New York)
25.
DyerJ, 1997, “Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value”Strategic Management Journal18535–556
26.
EfronBTibshiraniR J, 1993An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman and Hall, London)
27.
European Union, 2005, “Commission adopts a new definition of micro, small and medium sized enterprises in Europe”, Commission of the European Union, Brussels
28.
GarrodGWillisK, 1990, “Contingent valuation techniques: A review of their unbiasedness, efficiency and consistency”, WP 10, ESRC Countryside Change Initiative, University of Newcastle
29.
GranovetterM, 1973, “The strength of weak ties”The American Journal of Sociology781360–1380
30.
GrantW, 2000Pressure Groups and British Politics (Macmillan, London)
31.
GreavesJ, 2008, “Continuity or change in business representation in Britain? An assessment of the Heseltine initiatives of the 1990s”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26998–1015
32.
GreeneFMoleFStoreyD, 2008Three Decades of Enterprise Culture (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
33.
GulatiR, 1999, “Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation”Strategic Management Journal20397–420
HannaVWalshK, 2002, “Small firm networks: A successful approach to innovation”R&D Management32201–207
36.
HardingR, 1982Collective Action (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
37.
HilalE, 2010, “The significance of networking and company size in the level of creativeness of tourism companies: Antalya case”European Planning Studies181247–1266
38.
HorowitzJ L, 2001, “The bootstrap”, in Handbook of Econometrics 5 Eds HeckmanJ JLeamerE (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 3159–3228
39.
HugginsR, 1998, “Building and sustaining inter-firm networks: Lessons from Training and Enterprise Councils”Local Economy13133–150
40.
HugginsR, 2000, “The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development12111–135
41.
IyerSKitsonMTohB, 2005, “Social capital, economic growth and regional development”Regional Studies391015–1040
42.
JackSAndersonA, 2002, “The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process”Journal of Business Venturing17467–487
43.
KingsburyAHayterR, 2006, “Business associations and local development: The Okanagan wine industry's response to NAFTA”Geoforum37596–609
44.
LaschewskiLPhillipsonJGortonM, 2002, “The facilitation and formalisation of small business networks: Evidence from the north east of England”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20375–391
45.
LinN, 2001Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge University Press, New York)
46.
LinaresF, 2004, “Hawks, zealots and hypocrites, but not free riders: The logics of cooperation in Llano Del Beal: A qualitative case study”Rationality and Society16437–467
47.
LorenzenM, 2007, “Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics”Urban Studies44799–817
48.
MaddalaM, 1999Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
49.
MitchellRCarsonR, 1989, “Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method”, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
50.
NorthD, 2005Understanding the Process of Economic Change (Princeton University Press, Oxford)
51.
OinasP, 1997, “On the socio-spatial embeddedness of business firms”Erdkunde51(1) 23–32
52.
OliverR, 1997Satisfaction: A Behavioural Perspective on the Consumer (McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA)
53.
OlsonM, 1971The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups2nd edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
54.
OstromE, 1998, “A behavioural approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address to the American Political Science Association”American Political Science Review92(1) 1–22
55.
ParkerS, 2008, “The economics of formal business networks”Journal of Business Venturing23627–640
56.
PhillipsonJGortonMLaschewskiL, 2006, “Local business co-operation and the dilemmas of collective action: Rural micro-business networks in the north of England”Sociologia Ruralis4640–60
57.
PiJ, 2007, “Fairness compatibility constraint and collective actions”Frontiers of Economics in China2644–652
58.
PinaDBengtsonV, 1993, “The division of household labor and wives' happiness—ideology, employment and perceptions of support”Journal of Marriage and the Family55901–912
59.
PoteeteAOstromE, 2004, “Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management”Development and Change35435–461
60.
RabinM, 1993, “Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics”American Economic Review831281–1302
61.
RaleyMMoxeyA, 2000, “Rural microbusinesses in the North East of England: Final survey results”, Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle
62.
RayC, 2001Culture Economies (Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University)
63.
RingJ KPeredoA MChrismanJ J, 2009, “Business networks and economic development in rural communities in the United States”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34171–195
64.
RosenfeldS, 1996, “Does cooperation enhance competitiveness: Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration”Research Policy25247–263
65.
RosenfeldS, 2001, “Networks and clusters: The yin and yang of rural development”, in Conference Proceedings: Exploring Policy Options for a New Rural America pp 103–120, rtsinc.org/publications/pdf/KCFed.pdf
66.
SandlerTTschirhartJ, 1980, “The economic theory of clubs: An evaluative survey”Journal of Economic Literature181481–1521
67.
SchellingT, 1960Strategy and Conflict (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
68.
UzziB, 1996, “The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect”American Sociological Review61674–698
69.
VallerDWoodA, 2004, “Devolution and the politics of business representation in Britain: A strategic-relations approach”Environment and Planning A361835–1854
70.
WelchDOldsmanEShapiraPYoutieJLeeJ, 1997, “Net benefits: An assessment of a set of manufacturing business networks and their impacts on member companies” a report prepared for USNet and Regional Technology Strategies Inc., Chapel Hill, NC
71.
YoungN, 2010, “Business networks, collaboration and embeddedness in local and extra-local spaces: The case of Port Hardy, Canada”Sociologia Ruralis50392–408
72.
ZerbeRAndersonC L, 2001, “Culture and fairness in the development of institutions in the California gold fields”Journal of Economic History61(1), 114–143
