The nature, extent, and impact of residential mobility have attracted considerable interest. Little of this work has explored relationships between mobility and outcomes for area-based regeneration schemes. England's New Deal for Communities (NDC) Programme marks a departure from previous regeneration programmes in terms of levels of funding and time span. Evidence suggests that between 2002 and 2006 the thirty-nine NDC areas were subject to complex patterns of mobility, the most important drivers of which were age and tenure. Residents moving out of NDC areas did so for housing and environmental reasons and were less disadvantaged than those who stayed. Those moving into the areas during this period were not more disadvantaged than existing residents. Although there are associations between mobility and outcome change, these are not as strong as might be anticipated and their implications for area-based regeneration policy appear relatively marginal.
ALG, 2005Breaking Point: Examining the Disruption Caused by Pupil Mobility (Association of London Government, London)
2.
BaileyNLivingstonM, 2007Population Turnover and Area Deprivation (Policy Press, Bristol)
3.
BeattyCLawlessPWilsonI, 2011The Composite Index of Relative Change: Identifying Change in NDC AreasCentre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
4.
BuckN, 2001, “Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion”Urban Studies3822512275
5.
CheshirePMarleeIShephardS, 1998Harlesden City Challenge Final EvaluationHarlesden City Challenge, Harlesden
6.
ClarkWAV, 2008, “Re-examining the Moving to Opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration”Demography45515535
7.
ClarkWAVDielemanFM, 1996Households and Housing: Choices and Outcomes in the Housing Market (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ)
8.
ClarkWAVDeurlooMCDielmanFM, 2006, “Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes”Housing Studies21323342
9.
ClarkWAVvan HamMCoulterR, 2011, “Socio-spatial mobility in British society” DP 5861, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn
10.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2005A Review of the Evidence Base on Frequent Moving Among Disadvantaged Groups, Report to the Social Exclusion UnitSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield CLG, Communities and Local Government, London
11.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2007The Moving Escalator? Patterns of Residential Mobility in NDC Areas
12.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2008aNew Deal for Communities: A Synthesis of New Programme-wide Evidence 2006–7
13.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2008bPredictors of Community Cohesion: Multi-level Modelling of the 2005 Citizenship Survey
14.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2008cChallenges, Interventions and Change: An Overview of Neighbourhood Renewal in Six New Deal for Communities Areas
15.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2009aRaising Educational Attainment in Deprived Areas: The Challenges of Geography and Residential Mobility for Area-based Initiatives
16.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2009bUnderstanding and Tackling Worklessness Volume 1: Worklessness, Employment and Enterprise: Patterns and Change
17.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2009cResidential Mobility and Outcome Change in Deprived Areas: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme
18.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2009dUnderstanding and Tackling Worklessness Volume 2: Neighbourhood-level Problems, Interventions and Outcomes
19.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2010aThe New Deal for Communities Experience: A Final Assessment: The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Report Volume 7
20.
ColeIRobinsonDChampionTReeveKBenningtonJCowardSGoudieRHickmanP, 2010bExploring and Explaining Change in Regeneration Schemes: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme: The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Report Volume 5 (CLG, London)
21.
DoE, 1994Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
22.
DETR, 1998New Deal for Communities: Phase 1 Proposals: Guidance for Pathfinder ApplicantsDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
23.
DETR, 2001New Deal for Communities Financial GuidanceDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
24.
DrukkerMKaplanCvan OsJ, 2005, “Residential instability in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods, good or bad?”Health and Place11121129
25.
EvansMHarknessS, 2005Estimating the Impact of NDC using Labour Force Survey DataSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
26.
FeitjtenPvan HamM, 2009, “Neighbourhood change … reason to leave?”Urban Studies4621032122
27.
GalsterGC, 1987Homeowners and Neighbourhood ReinvestmentDuke University Press, Durham, NC
28.
GeistCMcManusPA, 2008, “Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications”Population, Space and Place14283303
29.
GibbonsSMachinS, 2003, “Valuing English primary schools”Journal of Urban Economics53197219
30.
GLE, 2005Building Sustainable Urban Communities (Greater London Enterprise, London)
31.
GuestAMCoverJKMatsuedaRLKubrinCE, 2006, “Neighbourhood context and neighbouring ties”City and Community5363385
32.
HippJ, 2010, “What is the ‘neighbourhood’ in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighbourhood and tract levels”Urban Studies4725172536
33.
LivingstonMBaileyNKearnsA, 2008People's Attachment to Place: The Influence of Neighbourhood DeprivationChartered Institute of Housing in association with Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Coventry
34.
LSE, 2007Population Mobility and Service Provision: A Report for London Councils (London School of Economics and Political Science, London
35.
MeenGNygaardC, 2007Long-Run Neighbourhood Dynamics—London 1881–2001University of Reading Business School, Reading
36.
OakleyDTsaoHS, 2006, “A new way of revitalising distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal Empowerment Zone program”Journal of Urban Affairs28443471
37.
ODPM, 2004aMainstream Public Services and their Impact on Deprived NeighbourhoodsOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
38.
ODPM, 2004bAssessing the Impacts of Spatial Interventions: Regeneration, Renewal and Regional DevelopmentOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
39.
ParkesAKearnsA, 2003, “Residential perceptions and housing mobility in Scotland: An analysis of the longitudinal Scottish House Condition Survey 1991–96”Housing Studies18673701
40.
PermentierMvan HamMBoltG, 2009, “Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood”Environment and Planning A4121622180
41.
QuigleyJWeinbergD, 1977, “Intra-urban residential mobility; a review and synthesis”International Regional Science Review24166
42.
RabeBTaylorM, 2010, “Residential mobility, quality of the neighbourhood and life course events”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)173531555
43.
RobsonBLymperopoulouKRaeA, 2008, “People on the move: Exploring the functional roles of deprived neighbourhoods”Environment and Planning A4026932714
44.
SEU, 1998Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood RenewalSocial Exclusion Unit, London
45.
SouthSJKCrowderKD, 2005, “Exiting and entering high-poverty neighbourhoods: Latinos, Blacks and Anglos compared”Social Forces84873900
46.
TemkinKRoheWM, 1998, “Social capital and neighbourhood stability: An empirical analysis”Housing Policy Debate96188
47.
TraversTTunstallRWhiteheadCPruvotS, 2007Population Mobility and Service Provision report to the London Councils, London School of Economics and Political Science, London
48.
TsfatiYCohenJ, 2003, “On the effect of the ‘third person effect’: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions”Journal of Communications53711727
49.
TunstallRCoulterA, 2006Twenty-five Years on Twenty Estates: Turning the Tide? (Policy Press, Bristol)
50.
van GentWPCMusterdSOsterndorfWJM, 2009, “Bridging the social divide? Reflections on current Dutch neighbourhood policy”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment24357368
