This paper offers a conceptual framework in which ‘the family’ is situated as an object of governmental intervention, on the one hand, and a site of discursive proliferation, on the other hand. Reading across the works of Michel Foucault and Jacques Donzelot, I argue that the family served an important, but often overlooked, role in Foucauldian conceptualizations of sovereign, disciplinary, and biopolitical modalities of power. In particular, the elaboration of disciplinary institutions and biopolitical governance converged in the family household; as a central point in these governmental strategies, the family's relationship to sexuality, child-rearing, and kinship provoked anxieties over race, nation building, sexuality, and gender. After reviewing how these concerns overlapped in US immigration policies, I analyze the debates concerning noncitizen family detention policy in the United States. I show how a series of proposals for family detention and release congealed around competing discourses of childhood innocence and criminality, prison and home, and parental authority and security. On the basis of this analysis, I argue that state and nonstate actors produce multiple normative family subjects through strategic spatializations of state and familial power.
BernsteinN, 2009, “US to reform policy on detention for immigrants”New York Times 6 August, page A1
3.
ColemanM, 2007, “Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico–US border”Antipode39 (1) 54–76
4.
ColemanM, 2008, “US immigration law and its geographies of social control: lessons from homosexual exclusion during the Cold War”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space261096–1114
5.
ColemanM, 2009, “What counts as the politics and practice of security, and where? Devolution and immigrant insecurity after 9/11”Annals of the Association of American Geographers99904–913
6.
ColemanMKocherA, 2010, “Detention, deportation, devolution and immigrant incapacitation in the US, post 9/11”The Geographical Journal177228–237
7.
ConlonD, 2010, “Ties that bind: governmentality, the state, and asylum in contemporary Ireland”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2895–111
8.
ConlonD, 2011, “A fractured mosaic: encounters with the everyday amongst refugee and asylum seeker women”Population, Space and Place17714–726
9.
CoutinS, 2010, “Confined within: national territories as zones of confinement”Political Geography29200–208
10.
DomoshM, 1999, “Sexing feminist geography”Progress in Human Geography23429–436
11.
DonzelotJ, 1979The Policing of Families (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD)
12.
DowM, 2005American Gulag: Inside U.S. Immigration Prisons (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
13.
FitzGeraldS, 2010, “Biopolitics and the regulation of vulnerability: the case of the female trafficked migrant”International Journal of Law in Context6277–294
14.
FoucaultM, 1990History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction (Vintage Books, New York)
15.
FoucaultM, 1995Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Vintage Books, New York)
16.
FoucaultM, 2003Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France 1973–1974 translated by BurchellG, Ed. LagrangeJ (Picador, New York)
17.
FoucaultM, 2006History of Madness (Routledge, New York)
MountzA, 2010Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
35.
NashC, 2005, “Geographies of relatedness”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30449–462
36.
NeumanG, 2006, “Discretionary deportation”Georgetown Immigration Law Journal20611–656
37.
OswinN, 2010, “Sexual tensions in modernizing Singapore: the postcolonial and the intimate”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28128–141
38.
OswinNOlundE, 2010, “Governing intimacy”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2860–67
39.
PallaresA, 2009, “Family matters: strategizing immigrant activism in Chicago”, in Series on Latino Migrant Civic Engagement Report 7, Mexico Institute, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
40.
PallaresAFlores-GonzálezN, 2011, “Regarding family: new actors in the Chicago protests”, in Rallying for Immigrant Rights: The Fight for Inclusion in 21st Century America Eds VossKBloemerardI (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA) pp 161–179
41.
ReddyC, 2005, “Asian diasporas, neoliberalism, and family: reviewing the case for homosexual asylum in the context of family rights”, Social Text23(3–4) 101–119
42.
ShahN, 2005, “Policing privacy, migrants, and the limits of freedom”, Social Text23(3–4) 275–284
43.
US Department of Homeland Security, 2006a, “DHS closes loophole by expanding Expedited Removal to cover illegal alien families”, press release 15 May
44.
US Department of Homeland Security, 2006b, “Remarks by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar and Acting Director of Detention and Removal Operations John Torres at an operational briefing on the Secure Border Initiative”, 9 February, available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0852.shtm
45.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement2003Endgame: Office of Detention and Removal Strategic Plan, 2003–2012 (US Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC)
46.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement2008aFamily Residential Design Standards copy available from author
47.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement2008bFamily Residential Standards copy available from author
48.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement2008c, “Solicitation hscedm-08-r-0005”, copy available from author
49.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement2009a, “Alternatives to detention for ICE detainees”, Press Release October 23, copy available from author
ValentineG, 2008, “The ties that bind: towards geographies of intimacy”Geography Compass22097–2110
52.
VERA Institute of Justice, 1998The Appearance Assistance Program: Attaining Compliance with Immigration Laws through Community Supervision (VERA Institute of Justice, New York)
53.
WhiteAGilmartinM, 2008, “Critical geographies of citizenship and belonging in Ireland”Women's Studies International Forum31390–399
54.
Women's Refugee Commission, 2007Locking Up Family Values: The Detention of Immigrant FamiliesLutheran Immigrant and Refugee Services, Baltimore, MD
