Mainstreaming Environment and Development at the World Trade Organization? Fisheries Subsidies,the Politics of Rule-Making,and the Elusive ‘Triple Win’
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2013
Mainstreaming Environment and Development at the World Trade Organization? Fisheries Subsidies,the Politics of Rule-Making,and the Elusive ‘Triple Win’
The relationship among trade liberalization, the environment, and socioeconomic development is marked by controversy, though it is well accepted that in practice economic interests often trump environmental concerns and that developing countries incur a range of costs to participate in, and comply with, multilateral and bilateral trade agreements. Politics and power dynamics in the rule-making process in liberalization negotiations are often implicated for generating these outcomes. To improve on this record, and in accordance with the rise in ‘market environmentalism’, World Trade Organization (WTO) members and advocacy groups have turned this rhetoric on its head and pushed for ‘synergy’ in which a single WTO rule to discipline fisheries subsidies at once liberalizes trade, generates an environmental improvement, and supports developing country aspirations—a much fêted ‘triple win’. We sketch the anatomy of the fisheries subsidies negotiations and explore how the triple win is used by blocks of states to justify different political—economic positions. This analysis sheds light on the challenges associated with seeking to use trade for the environment and for development and the dynamics that shape negotiations and the actually existing rules that emerge from the WTO.
AbdallahP RSumailaU R, 2007, “An historical account of Brazilian public policy on fisheries subsidies”Marine Policy31444–450
2.
AdamsW M, 2009Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in a Developing World (Routledge, London)
3.
BairochP, 1993Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes (Wheatsheaf, Brighton, Sussex)
4.
BentonL M, 1996, “The greening of free trade? The debate about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the environment”Environment and Planning A282155–2177
5.
BestorT, 2004Tsukiji: The Fish Market at the Center of the World (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
BhagwatiJ, 2004In Defense of Globalization (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
7.
BillsNGrossD, 2005, “Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: Comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK)”Land Use Policy22313–321
8.
BorrasS MEdelmanMKayC, 2008, “Transnational agrarian movements: Origins and politics, campaigns and impact”Journal of Agrarian Change8169–204
9.
BrownASternR, 2006, “Global market integration and national sovereignty”World Economy29257–279
10.
CamplingL, 2009, “First WTO meeting to discuss Chair's ‘Roadmap’ on fisheries subsidies disciplines”FFA Fisheries Trade News2(2) 1–3
11.
CamplingLHaviceEHamiltonA, 2009, “Update on fisheries subsidies ‘Roadmap’ discussion at the WTO”FFA Fisheries Trade News2(9) 1–2
12.
CamplingLHaviceEHowardP, 2012, “The political economy and ecology of capture fisheries: Market dynamics, resource access and relations of exploitation and resistance”Journal of Agrarian Change12177–203
13.
CantornaA ISindeI D CCantonA G, 2007, “Spain's fisheries sector: From the birth of modern fishing through to the decade of the seventies”Ocean Development and International Law35359–374
14.
CarlsenLSalazarH, 2002, “Limits to cooperation: A Mexican perspective on the NAFTA's environmental side agreement and institutions”, in Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade Eds DeereCEstyD (MIT Press, Cambridge) pp 221–244
15.
ChangH-J, 2002Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (Anthem Press, London)
16.
ChristensenTSnyderJ, 1990, “Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity”International Organization44137–168
17.
ConcaK, 2000, “The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance”Review of International Political Economy7484–494
18.
DeereCHaviceE, 2006, “Fisheries, international trade and sustainable development: Policy discussion paper”, International Trade and Sustainable Development Series, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva
19.
DiCaprioAGallagherK, 2006, “The WTO and the shrinking of development space: How big is the bite?”The Journal of World Investment and Trade26781–804
20.
EckersleyR, 2004, “The big chill: The WTO and multilateral environmental agreements”Global Environmental Politics424–50
21.
EstyD C, 2001, “Bridging the trade—environment divide”Journal of Economic Perspectives15113–130
22.
FAO, 1992Marine Fisheries (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome)
23.
FAO, 1996Overview of World Fisheries: Challenges and Prospects for Achieving Sustainable Resource Use (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome)
24.
FAO, 2010, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome)
25.
FindlayMSearleA E, 1998, “The North East Atlantic albacore fishery: A Cornish crisis of confidence”Marine Policy2295–108
26.
GallagherK, 2005Putting Development First: The Importance of Policy Space in the WTO and IFIs (Zed Books, London)
27.
GoldmanM, 2005Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
28.
GonzalesA, 2002, “Trade and investment linkage: A WWF perspective”, in New Horizons for Foreign Direct Investment (OECD, Paris) pp 242–245
29.
GrynbergRTsamenyiM, 1998, “Fisheries subsidies, the WTO and the Pacific island tuna fisheries”Journal of World Trade32127–145
30.
HaviceECamplingL, 2010, “Shifting tides in the Western Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: The political economy of regulation and industry responses”Global Environmental Politics1089–114
31.
HaworthNHughesSWilkinsonR, 2005, “The international labour standards regime: A case study in global regulation”Environment and Planning A371939–1953
32.
HeynenNMcCarthyJPrudhamSRobbinsP, 2007Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences (Routledge, London)
33.
HollanderG M, 2004, “Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape”Geoforum35299–312
34.
HongS-GRyuJ-GKimS-P, 1999, “Adjustment of fishing fleet capacity in Korea to sustainable resources exploitation, programmes and achievements”, in KMI/ Africa/ Regional Workshop on the Effects of Globalisation and Deregulation on Marine Capture Fisheries in Asia and the Pacific. Pusan, Republic of Korea, 11–15 October 1999 FAO Fisheries Report no. 624, FAO, Rome
35.
ICTSD, 2011, “Panel rules US ‘dolphin safe’ label too trade restrictive”, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable DevelopmentBridges Weekly Trade News Digest15(31)
36.
JawaraFKwaA, 2004Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations, Lessons of Cancun (Zed Books, London)
LequesneC, 2004The Politics of Fisheries in the European Union (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
39.
McCarthyJ, 2004, “Privatizing conditions of production: Trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance”Geoforum35327–341
40.
McCarthyJ, 2005, “Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies—reactionary or radical?”Progress in Human Geography29773–782
41.
MaddisonA, 2006, “The world economy”, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
42.
MansfieldB, 2004, “Rules of privatization: Contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94565–584
43.
MansfieldB, 2011, “‘Modern’ industrial fisheries and the crisis of overfishing”, in Global Political Ecology Eds PeetRRobbinsPWattsM J (Routledge, London) pp 84–99
44.
MeuriotE, 1986, “Fishing fleet replacement: The French policy from 1945 to 1983”Marine Policy10294–309
45.
MilazzoM, 1998, “Subsidies in world fisheries: A reexamination”, TP 406, World Bank, Washington, DC
46.
MRAG, 2005, “Review of impacts of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing on developing countries”, Marine Resources Assessment Group Ltd, London
47.
NarlikarA, 2004, “The ministerial process and power dynamics in the World Trade Organization: Understanding failure from Seattle to Cancún”New Political Economy9413–428
48.
PeckJ, 2001, “Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes”Progress in Human Geography25445–455
PritchardB, 2005, “How the rule of the market rules the law: The political economy of WTO dispute settlement as evidenced in the US—lamb meat decision”Review of International Political Economy12776–803
51.
SampsonG P, 2001, “Effective multilateral environment agreements and why the WTO needs them”The World Economy241109–1134
52.
SampsonG P, 2002, “The environmentalist paradox: The World Trade Organization's challenges”Harvard International Review Winter 56–61
53.
SchorrD, 2004Healthy Fisheries, Sustainable Trade: Crafting New Rules on Fishing Subsidies in the World Trade Organization (WWF, Gland)
54.
SelwynB, 2009, “An historical materialist appraisal of Friedrich List and his modern-day followers”New Political Economy14157–180
55.
ShafferGRatton-SanchezMRosenbergB, 2008, “The trials of winning at the WTO: What lies behind Brazil's success”Cornell International Law Journal41383–429
56.
ShaikhA, 2005, “The economic mythology of neoliberalism”, in Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader Eds Saad-FilhoAJohnstonD (Pluto Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 41–49
57.
SharpRSumailaR U, 2009, “Quantification of US marine fisheries subsidies”North American Journal of Fisheries Management2918–32
58.
SmithA, 2009, “How the WTO matters to industry: The case of scotch whisky”International Political Sociology3176–193
59.
StoneC, 2002, “Too many fishing boats, too few fish: Can trade laws trim subsidies and restore the balance in global fisheries?”, in the Earthscan Reader on International Trade and Sustainable Development Eds GallagherKWerksmanJ (Earthscan, London) pp 286–321
60.
de ViveroSuárez J LMateosRodríguez J C, 2010, “Ocean governance in a competitive world: The BRIC countries as emerging maritime powers—building new geopolitical scenarios”Marine Policy34967–978
61.
SumailaU RKhanAWatsonRMunroGZellerDBaronNPaulyD, 2007, “The World Trade Organization and global fisheries sustainability”Fisheries Research881–4
62.
SumailaU RKhanA SDyckA JWatsonRMunroGTyedmersPPaulyD, 2010, “A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies”Journal of Bioeconomics12201–225
63.
UNEP, 2008Fisheries Subsidies: A Critical Issue for Trade and Sustainable Development at the WTO—An Introductory GuideUnited Nations Environment Programme, Geneva
64.
United Nations, 2002, “Plan of implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development”, United Nations, Johannesburg von Moltke A, 2011 Fisheries Subsidies, Sustainable Development and the WTO (Earthscan/UNEP, London)
65.
WadeR, 2003, “What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’”Review of International Political Economy10621–644
66.
WilkinsonR, 2009, “Language, power and multilateral trade negotiations”Review of International Political Economy16597–619
67.
World Bank, 2008, “The sunken billions: The economic justification for fisheries reform”, in Agricultural and Rural Development Sustainable Development Network (The World Bank, Washington, DC)
68.
WTO, World Trade Organization, Geneva
69.
1994, PC/SCTE/M/5, “Preparatory Committee for the World Trade Organization Sub-Committee on Trade and Environment, report of the meeting held on 23–24 November 1994—note by the secretariat”.
70.
1997, WT/CTE/W/51, “Environmental and trade benefits of removing subsidies in the fishing sector-submission by the United States”.
71.
2001, WT/MIN(01)/Dec/1, “Ministerial declaration”, in World Trade Organization Ministerial ConferenceDoha
72.
2003, WT/CTE/W/226, “Analysis of the relationship between fisheries subsidies and overexploitation of fisheries resources—submission by Japan”.
73.
2005, WT/MIN(05)/Dec, “Doha work programme ministerial declaration”, in World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference Sixth SessionHong Kong
2010World Trade Report 2010: Trade in Natural Resources.
76.
WWF, 1997Subsidies and Depletion of World Fisheries: Case StudiesWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC
77.
WWF, 1999a, “Reform of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism for sustainable development”, WWF International Discussion Paper, WWF, Gland
78.
WWF, 1999b, “Trade measures and multilateral environmental agreements: Resolving uncertainty and removing the WTO chill factor”, WWF International Discussion Paper, WWF, Gland
79.
YoungM A, 2009, “Fragmentation or interaction: The WTO, fisheries subsidies, and international law”World Trade Review8477–515
