While Turkey and California suffer similar wildfire risks, they have developed diametrically opposed fire-suppression strategies: the former adopted an increasingly centralized strategy, while the latter depends upon a highly decentralized system. This paper is a comparative analysis that relates the politics of land use in wildland–urban interfaces (WUIs) to this divergence in firefighting strategies. Our argument is that the evolution of the divergent fire-suppression strategies in California and Turkey are linked to two different types of rent-seeking behavior. Developers and landed interest seek absolute rent in Turkey and differential rent in California. The decentralized strategy in California allows property prices to be distinguished between areas of low and high protection, and commodifies safety as a form of investment regulating the market prices of land. In Turkey, the tendency toward centralization of firefighting is a part of the composite political strategy to open new land for development by completing the hitherto unfinished cadastral records of the WUIs. Thus, the centralized firefighting strategy leads indirectly to extensive commodification of the WUIs in Turkey and expands the national land market.
AckermanW, 1999, “Growth control versus the growth machine in Redlands California: Conflict in urban land use”Urban Geography20146–167
2.
AlagonaP S, 2006, “What makes a disaster ‘natural’?”Space and Culture977–79
3.
AslanSAlkanHEkerM, 2008, “2/B Uygulamalarιna İlişkin Bazι Sorunlar: Isparta-Aksu Yöresi Örneǧi”Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi DergisiA(2) 1–8
4.
AyberkHKüçükosmanoǧluACebeciH, 2010, “The structure and importance of fire suppressing organizations in Turkey”Scientific Research Essays5456–460
5.
BalabanU, 2011, “The enclosure of urban space and consolidation of the capitalist land regime in Turkish cities”Urban Studies482162–2179
6.
BankoffGLübkenUSandJ, 2012Flammable Cities: Urban Conflagration and the Making of the Modern World (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
7.
BarliOBaskentE ZTurkerM FGedikT, 2006, “Analytical approach for analyzing and providing solutions for the conflicts among forest stakeholders across Turkey”Forest Policy and Economics9219–236
8.
BartlettJ GMageeanD MO'ConnorR J, 2000, “Residential expansion as a continental threat to US coastal ecosystems”Population and Environment21429–468
9.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London)
10.
BeckageBPlattW JPankoB, 2005, “A climate-based approach to the restoration of fire-dependent ecosystems”Restoration Ecology13429–431
11.
BilgiliE, 1999, “Forest fires and fire management policies in Turkey”, in Report on Public Policies Affecting Forest FiresFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 357–361, http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/x2095e/x2095e00.pdf
12.
BιyιkC, 2007, “Kadastro Çalιşmalarιnda Orman Yerlerinin Tespitinde Çιkan Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri”, TMMOB Harita Ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odasý (Ankara)
13.
BlauJ R, 1984Architects and Firms: A Sociological Perspective on Architectural Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
BusbyG MAlbersH JMontgomeryC A, 2012, “Wildfire risk management in a landscape with fragmented ownership and spatial interactions”Land Economics88496–517
15.
ButtelF H, 1987, “New directions in environmental sociology”Annual Review of Sociology13465–488
16.
ÇaǧlarY, 2003, “Tarihsiz, Boyutsuz ve Derinliksiz '2 B' Tartιşmalarιna Katkιlar”Kamu Yönetimi Dergisi16(4) 9–28
17.
ÇaǧlarY, 2007, “Ormalarιmιz ‘Dün’ Yandι, ‘bugün’ de Yanιyor ve ‘Yarιn da’ yanacak!”Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik 13 July
California Land Conservation Act, 1965, California Government Code §51200-51207
23.
CattonW RDunlapR E, 1978, “Environmental sociology: A new paradigm”American Sociologist1341–49
24.
CollinsT, 2008, “The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: Marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona's White Mountains”Journal of Political Ecology1521–43
25.
DavisM, 1998Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster (Metropolitan Books, New York)
26.
DemirMKüçükosmanoǧluAHasdemirMAcarHOzturkT, 2010, “Assessment of forest roads and firebreaks in Turkey”African Journal of Biotechnology84553–4561
27.
DuffieldM, 2007Development, Security and Unending War (Polity Press, Cambridge)
28.
EasterlingK, 2005Enduring Innocence: Global Architecture and Its Political Masquerades (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
EC Directorate—General Environment, 2003, “Forest fires in Europe 2003”, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra
30.
EC Directorate—General Environment, 2010, “Forest fires in Europe 2010”, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra
31.
EllinN, 1997Architecture of Fear (Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, NJ)
32.
EriksenC, 2007, “Why do they burn the ‘bush’? Fire, rural livelihoods, and conservation in Zambia”The Geographical Journal173242–256
EvesC, 2003, “The impact of natural disasters on residential property markets”, paper presented at 10th European Real Estate Society Conference, Helsinki, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28843/1/c28843.pdf
35.
FAO, 2003, “Community-based fire management: Case studies from China, The Gambia, Honduras, India, the Lao People's Democratic Republic and Turkey”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok
36.
FreudenburgW RGramlingRLaskaSEriksonK T, 2009, “Organizing hazards, engineering disasters? Improving the recognition of political–economic factors in the creation of disasters”Social Forces871015–1038
37.
FuA S, 2013, “The façade of safety in California's shelter-in-place homes: History, wildfire and social consequence”Critical Sociology39833–849
38.
GallT L, (Ed.), 2006Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations12th edition (Gale, Farmington Hills, MI)
39.
GoetzB, 1997, “State theory and fire control: Selection mechanisms in local government”Critical Sociology2333–62
40.
GoldmanMSchurmanR A, 2000, “Closing the ‘great divide’: New social theory on society and nature”Annual Review of Sociology26563–584
41.
GülcanO, 2002Orman Arazilerinin YöntemiYildiz Technical University, Istanbul
42.
GülöksüzE, 2010, “Ormanda Mülkiyet Haklarι Mücadelesi ve Orman Yasasι'nιn 2/B Düzenlemesi”Ekonomik Yaklaşιm21(74) 59–87
GustafsonG CWallaceL T, 1975, “Differential assessment as land use policy: The California case”Journal of the American Institute of Planners41379–389
45.
HammerR BRadeloffV CFriedJ SStewartS I, 2007, “Wildland–urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington”International Journal of Wildland Fire16255–265
46.
HansenA JRaskerRMaxwellBRotellaJ JJohnsonJ DParmenterA WLangnerUCohenW BLawrenceR LKraskaM P, 2002, “Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West”BioScience52151–162
47.
HewittK, 1983, “The idea of calamity in a technocratic age”, in Interpretations of Calamity Ed. HewittK, (Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA) pp 3–32
48.
HewittK, 1997Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters (Longman, New York)
49.
HudsonJ C, 2002Across This Land: A Regional Geography of the United States and Canada (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
JasanoffS, 1994The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
52.
KaikaM, 2004, “Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: Domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28265–286
53.
KeeleyJ E, 2002, “Fire management of California shrubland landscapes”Environmental Management29395–408
54.
KeysAMasterman-SmithHCottleD, 2006, “The political economy of a natural disaster: The Boxing Day tsunami, 2004”Antipode38195–204
55.
KimelbergS M, 2011, “Inside the growth machine: Real estate professionals on the perceived challenges of urban development”City and Community1076–99
56.
KleinN, 2008The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (Palgrave Macmillan, New York)
57.
KruegerA O, 1974, “The political economy of the rent-seeking society”The American Economic Review64291–303
58.
KullC A, 2004Isle of Fire: The Political Ecology of Landscape Burning in Madagascar (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
59.
LinaresA ZLinaresH A, 1990, “Burn prevention: The need for a comprehensive approach”Burns16281–285
60.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
61.
LowS M, 1997, “Urban fear: Building the fortress city”City and Society953–71
MarxK, 1993Capital: A Critique of Political Economy reprint (Penguin Classics, New York)
64.
MinnichR, 1988The Biogeography of Fire in the San Bernardino Mountains of CaliforniaUniversity of California Publications in Geography, Berkeley, CA
65.
MitchellJ W, 2007, “The county's ‘shelter-in-place’ gamble”San Diego Union-Tribune 2 May
66.
MolA P JSpaargarenG, 1993, “Environment, modernity and the risk-society: The apocalyptic horizon of environmental reform”International Sociology8431–459
67.
MolotchH, 1976, “The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place”The American Journal of Sociology82309–332
68.
MukheibirPZiervogelG, 2007, “Developing a municipal adaptation plan (MAP) for climate change: The city of Cape Town”Environment and Urbanization19143–158
69.
MusaoǧluNGökselÇKayaŞSaroǧluEBektaşF, 2005, “İstanbul Anadolu Yakasι 2B Alanlarιnιn Uydu Görüntüleri ile Analizi”TMMOB Harita Ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odasι (Ankara)
ParkerD, 2012Global Real Estate Investment Trusts: People, Process and Management (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ)
72.
PausasJ GFernández-MuñozS, 2012, “Fire regime changes in the Western Mediterranean Basin: From fuel-limited to drought-driven fire regime”Climatic Change110215–226
73.
PellingMDillK, 2010, “Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes”Progress in Human Geography3421–37
74.
PenceG QBothaM ATurpieJ K, 2003, “Evaluating combinations of on- and off-reserve conservation strategies for the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: A financial perspective”Biological Conservation112253–273
75.
PincetlS, 1994, “The regional management of growth in California: A history of failure”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18256–274
76.
PincetlS S, 2003Transforming California: A Political History of Land Use and Development (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
77.
PolanyiK, 2001The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time2nd edition (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
78.
PressD, 2002Saving Open Space: The Politics of Local Preservation in California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
79.
PyneS J, 2001Fire: A Brief History (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
80.
Quimby Act, 1965, California Government Code §66477
81.
RadeloffV CHammerR BStewartS IFriedJ SHolcombS SMcKeefryJ F, 2005, “The wildland–urban interface in the United States”Ecological Applications15799–805
82.
RahlaoS JMiltonS JEslerK JVan WilgenB WBarnardP, 2009, “Effects of invasion of fire-free arid shrublands by a fire-promoting invasive alien grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in South Africa”Austral Ecology34920–928
RobbinsP, 2002, “Obstacles to a First World political ecology? Looking near without looking up”Environment and Planning A341509–1513
85.
RudelT KO'NeillKGottliebPMcDermottMHatfieldC, 2011, “From middle to upper class sprawl? Land use controls and changing patterns of real estate development in northern New Jersey”Annals of the Association of American Geographers101609–624
86.
ŞahinY GİnceT, 2009, “Early forest fire detection using radio-acoustic sounding system”Sensors91485–1498
87.
SDRDF, 2007, “October 2007 fires: Community needs assessment report”, San Diego Regional Disaster Fund, San Diego Foundation
88.
ShliskyA, 2007, “Fire, ecosystems and people: Threats and strategies for global biodiversity conservation”, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA
89.
SmithM DGiraudD, 2006, “Traditional land-use planning regulation and agricultural land conservation: A case study from the USA”Planning Practice and Research21407–421
SorensenJ HShumpertB LVogtB M, 2004, “Planning for protective action decision making: Evacuate or shelter-in-place”Journal of Hazardous Materials1091–11
92.
StephensS LAdamsM AHandmerJKearnsF RLeicesterBLeonardJMoritzM A, 2009, “Urban–wildland fires: How California and other regions of the US can learn from Australia”Environmental Research Letters41–5
93.
SullivanW C, 1994, “Perceptions of the rural–urban fringe: Citizen preferences for natural and developed settings”Landscape and Urban Planning2985–101
94.
TheobaldD M, 2001, “Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe”Geographical Review91544–564
95.
TroyARommJ, 2004, “Assessing the price effects of flood hazard disclosure under the California natural hazard disclosure law (AB 1195)”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management47137–162
96.
TroyARommJ, 2006, “An assessment of the 1998 California Natural Hazard Disclosure Law (AB 1195)”, California Policy Research Center, Berkeley, CA
USDA Forest Service, 1996The Use of Fire in Forest RestorationIntermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT
99.
ÜstünK, 2009Orman Vasfιnι Yitirmiş Arazilerin Deǧerlemesi: Ankara Ili Kιzιlcahamam Ilçesi Örneǧi thesis, Ankara University
100.
UzgelİDuruB, (Eds), 2009AKP Kitabι: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu (Phoenix, Ankara)
101.
Van EttenJJongerdenJDe VosH JKlaasseAVan HoeveE C E, 2008, “Environmental destruction as a counterinsurgency strategy in the Kurdistan region of Turkey”Geoforum391786–1797
102.
VaughnJCortnerH J, 2010, “Funding fire: A losing proposition?”California Journal of Politics and Policy21–17
103.
Wai-PoiM, 2005, “Financing the millennium development goals: The Millennium Project Report”Journal of International Affairs58285–290
WesterlingA LCayanD RBrownT JHallB LRiddleL G, 2004, “Climate, Santa Ana winds and autumn wildfires in southern California”Eos85(31) 289–296
106.
WickramasingheA, 2005, “Tsunami: Building the nation through reciprocity while reconstructing the affected areas in Sri Lanka”Local Environment10543–549
