Our study investigates why low-income Mexican-American residents living in rural and periurban subdivisions (colonias) in South Texas, one of the poorest regions in the United States, are increasingly dependent upon water vending machines as the main source of drinking water despite continued water infrastructure development. We outline a relational framework that builds on current debates within nature–society scholarship to address this paradox. We demonstrate how institutional enclosure—the creation or repurposing of institutions that curtails public participation in water governance—paired with water quality discourses and daily practices, operate over time to enroll residents as neoliberal subjects. We focus our attention on the emergence of the ‘water consumer’, or the individual who purchases drinking water from the vending machine. This approach addresses the coproduction of political subjectivities in relation to institutional change and how subjectivity reconstitutes a new hydrosocial relationship mediated by the water vending machine. We argue for a relational approach that attends to the production of political subjectivities as central to, not as a result of, the neoliberalization of nature.
BrannstromC, 2012, “John Shary, Charles Pease, and contested irrigation landscapes in early-twentieth-century South Texas”Journal of Historical Geography38234–246
8.
BrannstromCNeumanM, 2009, “Inventing the ‘Magic valley’ of South Texas, 1905–1941”Geographical Review99123–145
9.
CarewJWardP M, 2001, “Tracking land ownership in self-help homestead subdivisions in the United States: The case of Texas”Land Use Policy18165–178
10.
CastreeN, 2008a, “Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation”Environment and Planning A40131–152
11.
CastreeN, 2008b, “Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations”Environment and Planning A40153–173
12.
CavanaghS M, 2001Thirsty Colonias: Determinants of Water Service Coverage in South TexasBelfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
13.
DolhinowR, 2010A Jumble of Needs: Women's Activism and Neoliberalism in the Colonias of the Southwest (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
14.
DonelsonA, 2004, “The role of NGOs and NGO networks in meeting the needs of US colonias”Community Development Journal39332–344
15.
DonelsonA JEsparzaA X, 2010The Colonias Reader: Economy, Housing, and Public Health in US–Mexico Border Colonias (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ)
16.
EkersMLoftusA, 2008, “The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26698–718
17.
EkersMLoftusA, 2013, “Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn?”Progress in Human Geography37234–252
18.
EsparzaA XDonelsonA J, 2008Colonias in Arizona and New Mexico: Border Poverty and Community Development Solutions (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ)
19.
FeldmanSGeislerCMenonG A, 2011Accumulating Insecurity: Violence and Dispossession in the Making of Everyday Life (University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA)
20.
FosterK A, 1999The Political Economy of Special-purpose Government (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC)
21.
GAO, 1998, “Drinking water: Some households rely on untreated water from irrigation systems”, Government Accounting Office, United States Government, Washington, DC
22.
GleickP, 2010Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water (Island Press, Washington, DC)
23.
GuthmanJ, 2007, “The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance”Antipode39456–478
24.
GuthmanJ, 2008, “Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy”Geoforum391241–1253
25.
HaggertyJ H, 2007, “‘I'm not a greenie but…’: Environmentality, eco-populism and governance in New Zealand experiences from the Southland whitebait fishery”Journal of Rural Studies23222–237
26.
HarridenK, 2012, “Without households, water management is not integrated”Water Practice and Technology7, doi:10.2166/wpt.2010.ozo
27.
HarrisE, 2009, “Neoliberal subjectivities or a politics of the possible? Reading for difference in alternative food networks”Area4155–63
28.
HennebergerJCarlisleKPaupK, 2010, “Housing in Texas colonias”, in The Colonias Reader: Economy, Housing, and Public Health in US–Mexico Border Colonias Eds DonelsonA JEsparzaA X, (The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ) pp 101–114
29.
JepsonW, 2005, “Spaces of labor activism, Mexican-American women and the farm worker movement in Texas's Lower Rio Grande Valley”Antipode37679–702
30.
JepsonW, 2012, “Claiming space, claiming water: Contested legal geographies of water in South Texas”The Annals of the Association of American Geographers103614–631
31.
JepsonW, 2014, “Measuring a ‘no-win’ waterscape: Experience-based scales and classification approaches to assess household water security in colonias on the US–Mexico border”Geoforum51107–112
32.
JepsonWBrannstromC, 2013, “Techno-nature: The scalar politics of water governance in South Texas”, in Negotiating Scale in Water Governance Eds NormanECookCCohenA, (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) forthcoming
33.
JepsonWBrannstromCPersonsN, 2012, “‘We don't take the pledge’: Environmentality and environmental skepticism at the epicenter of US wind energy development”Geoforum43851–863
34.
JubasK, 2007, “Conceptual con/fusion in democratic societies”Journal of Consumer Culture7231–254
35.
KleinmanAFitz-HenryE, 2007, “The experiential basis of subjectivity: How individuals change in the context of societal transformation”, in Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations Eds BiehlJGoodBKleinmanA, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 52–65
36.
KothariU, 2005, “Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent”Antipode37425–446
37.
LemosM CAustinDMeridethRVaradyR G, 2002, “Public–private partnerships as catalysts for community-based water infrastructure development: The Border WaterWorks program in Texas and New Mexico colonias”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20281–296
38.
LiT M, 2007, “Practices of assemblage and community forest management”Economy and Society36263–293
39.
LiT M, 2008The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
40.
LiT M, 2010, “To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations”Antipode41(S1) 66–93
41.
LintonJ, 2010What is Water?: The History of a Modern Abstraction (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC)
42.
LoftusA, 2006, “Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter”Antipode381023–1045
43.
LoftusA, 2009, “The Theses on Feuerbach as a political ecology of the possible”Area41157–166
44.
LoftusA, 2012Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
45.
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283
46.
MacDonaldK I, 2010, “The devil is in the (bio) diversity: Private sector ‘engagement’ and the restructuring of biodiversity conservation”Antipode42513–550
47.
McDonaldY JGrineskiS E, 2011, “Disparities in access to residential plumbing: A binational comparison of environmental injustice in El Paso and Ciudad Juárez”Population and Environment32376–387
48.
MansfieldB, 2008Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature–Society Relations (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MD)
49.
MansveltJ, 2007, “Geographies of consumption: Citizenship, space and practice”Progress in Human Geography31105–117
50.
MarilR L, 1989Poorest of Americans: The Mexican Americans of the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN)
51.
MeehanK, 2013, “Disciplining de facto development: Water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31319–336
52.
MullinsM, 2009Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
ParcherJ WHumbersonD G, 2009, “Using GIS to assess priorities of infrastructure and health needs of colonias along the United States–Mexico border”Journal of Latin American Geography8129–148
55.
PassavantP A, 2004, “The governmentality of consumption”Interventions6381–400
56.
PassavantP A, 2005, “The strong neo-liberal state: Crime, consumption, governance”Theory and Event8(3), doi:10.1353/tae.2005.0049
57.
PovinelliE A, 2011Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
58.
RichardsonD, 2005, “Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalization”Antipode37515–535
59.
RobbinsPLuginbuhlA, 2005, “The last enclosure: Resisting privatization of wildlife in the western United States”Capitalism Nature Socialism1645–61
60.
ShirleyM M, 1999, “Bureaucrats in business: The roles of privatization versus corporatization in state-owned enterprise reform”World Development27115–136
61.
SmithL, 2004, “The murky waters of the second wave of neoliberalism: Corporatization as a service delivery model in Cape Town”Geoforum35375–393
62.
SmithN, [1984] 2012Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA)
63.
StubbsM JRisterM ELacewellR DEllisJ RRobinsonJ R CInstituteT W R, 2003Evolution of Irrigation Districts and Operating Institutions: Texas, Lower Rio Grande ValleyTexas Water Resources Institute, The Texas A&M University System
64.
SwyngedouwE, 2004Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
65.
TDHS, 1988The Colonias Factbook: A Survey of Living Conditions in Rural Areas of South and West Texas Border CountiesTexas Department of Human Services, Austin, TX
VasudevanAMcFarlaneCJeffreyA, 2008, “Spaces of enclosure”Geoforum391641–1646
69.
Von SchnitzlerA, 2008, “Citizenship prepaid: Water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa”Journal of Southern African Studies34899–917
70.
WardP, 1999Urbanization by Stealth (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX)
71.
WilsonRMenziesP, 1997, “The colonias water bill: Communities demanding change”, in Public Policy and Community: Activism and Governance in Texas Ed. WilsonR, (The University of Texas, Austin, TX) pp 229–274
72.
Guadalupe Jimenez et al. v. Hidalgo Water Control and Improvement District # 2 et al., No. 73-3557, 496 F.2d 113 (1974).
73.
Juan Fonseca et al., v. Hidalgo Water Control and Improvement District # 2 et al., No. 73-3556, 496 F.2d 109 (1974).
74.
Opinion of the Single-Judge District Court, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brownsville Division, Nos. 720-B0171 and 72-B-180 (1973).
75.
The City of Combes v. East Rio Honda Water Supply Corporation, No. B-02-169, 244 F. 2d (2002).
76.
Documents consulted and cited in this article are deposited at The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), Stanford University Libraries, Special Collections.
77.
MALDEF, 1972, Reply Brief of Defendant, (H&CWCID 9), M0673 RG5
78.
MALDEF, 1973a, Defendant's brief (H&CWCID 9), companion cases Jimenez v. Hidalgo WCID 2 et al. and Fonseca et al. v. Hidalgo Water Control and Improvement District # 2 et al., M0673 RG5 B772 F2.
79.
MALDEF, 1973b, Brief, Hidalgo Water Control and Improvement District # 2, M0673 RG65 B771, F3.
80.
MALDEF, 1973c, Amended Motion to Dismiss, M0673 RG5 B772 F1
81.
MALDEF, 1973d, Brief, Hidalgo Water Control and Improvement District # 2, M0673 RG65 B771, F3
