This paper suggests that as pervasive computing technologies have gained purchase in urban space they have also become more implicitly blended with everyday life and more contingent on information that is inductively compiled from Internet-based data services. It is argued that existing theorizations of the technologically mediated production of urban must engage with the increasingly implicit nature of informational transactions as well as the emergent semantic structuring of information. Drawing on examples of ongoing pervasive computing projects, implicit computing procedures are explored in relation to the mediation of everyday urban life. Literatures from computing science and geographical theory are brought into conversation in order to examine the consequences of a convergence between implicit pervasive technologies and the spaces of everyday life.
AguiarR LSarmaABijwaardDMarchettiLPacynaP, 2007, “Pervasiveness in a competitive multi-operator environment: The Daidalos project”Communications Magazine, IEEE4522–26
Berners-LeeTHendlerJLassilaO, 2001, “The semantic web”Scientific American28434–43
10.
BrandtzægP BHeimJKarahasanovićA, 2011, “Understanding the new digital divide—a typology of Internet users in Europe”International Journal of Human–Computer Studies69123–138
11.
BreukerJ, 2013, “A cognitive science perspective on knowledge acquisition”International Journal of Human–Computer Studies71177–183
12.
BrighentiA, 2007, “Visibility—a category for the social sciences”Current Sociology55323–342
13.
BrighentiA M, 2012, “New media and urban motilities: A territoriologic point of view”Urban Studies49399–414
ClearyFRomeroAJaehnertJYongzhengL, 2008, “Daidalos II: Implementing a scenario driven process”, in Software Engineering Advances, 2008. ICSEA '08. The Third International Conference (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) pp 313–318
16.
CoutazJCrowleyJ LDobsonSGarlanD, 2005, “Context is key”Communications of the ACM4849–53
17.
CrangMCrosbieTGrahamS, 2007, “Technology, time–space, and the remediation of neighbourhood life”Environment and Planning A392405–2422
18.
d'AmatoCFanizziNFazzingaBGottlobGLukasiewiczT, 2010, “Combining semantic web search with the power of inductive reasoning”Lecture Notes in Computer Science6379137–150
19.
d'AmatoCFanizziNFazzingaBGottlobGLukasiewiczT, 2012, “Ontology-based semantic search on the Web and its combination with the power of inductive reasoning”Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence6583–121
20.
DaveB, 2007, “Space, sociality, and pervasive computing”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34381–382
DiMaggioPHargittaiECelesteCShaferS, 2004, “Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use”, in Social Inequality Ed. NeckermanK M, (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 355–400
23.
DodgeMKitchinR, 2005, “Code and the transduction of space”Annals of the Association of American Geographers95162–180
24.
DodgeMKitchinRZookM, 2009, “How does software make space? Exploring some geographical dimensions of pervasive computing and software studies”Environment and Planning A411283–1293
25.
DohertyA RCapraniNConaireC ÓKalnikaiteVGurrinCSmeatonA FO'ConnorN E, 2011, “Passively recognising human activities through lifelogging”Computers in Human Behavior271948–1958
26.
DourishPBellG, 2007, “The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: Meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34414–430
27.
DourishPBellG, 2011Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
28.
DuffC, 2010, “On the role of affect and practice in the production of place”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28881–895
ElciARahnamaBKamranS, 2008, “Defining a strategy to select either of closed/open world assumptions on semantic robots”, in Computer Software and Applications, 2008. COMPSAC '08. 32nd Annual IEEE International (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) pp 417–423
HargittaiEHinnantA, 2008, “Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet”Communication Research35602–621
36.
HealeyP, 2007Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times (Routledge, London)
37.
JonesM, 2009, “Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond”Progress in Human Geography33487–506
38.
KelleyM, 2013, “The emergent urban imaginaries of geosocial media”GeoJournal78181–203
39.
KinsleyS, 2010, “Representing ‘things to come’: Feeling the visions of future technologies”Environment and Planning A422771–2790
40.
KitchinRDodgeM, 2011Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
41.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
42.
LesterLHutchinsB, 2012, “The power of the unseen: Environmental conflict, the media and invisibility”Media Culture and Society34847–863
43.
McCulloughM, 2007, “New media urbanism: Grounding ambient information technology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34383–395
44.
McFarlaneC, 2011, “The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29649–671
45.
MackenzieA, 2002Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed (Continuum Press, London)
46.
MartinD, 2000, “Constructing place: Cultural hegemonies and media images of an inner-city neighborhood”Urban Geography21380–405
47.
MartinDMcCannEPurcellM, 2003, “Space, scale, governance, and representation: Contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy”Journal of Urban Affairs25113–121
48.
MasseyD, 2006, “Landscape as a provocation”Journal of Material Culture1133–48
49.
MasseyDJessP M, 1995A Place in the World?: Places, Cultures and Globalization (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
50.
MeyenMPfaff-RudigerSDudenhofferKHussJ, 2010, “The internet in everyday life: A typology of internet users”Media Culture and Society32873–882
ShadboltN, 2013, “Knowledge acquisition and the rise of social machines”International Journal of Human–Computer Studies71200–205
58.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (Blackwell, New York)
59.
StreitzNNixonP, 2005, “The disappearing computer”Communications of the ACM4833–35
60.
TaylorN, 2008, “Personal eSpace and personal smart spaces”, in Self-adaptive and Self-organizing Systems Workshops, 2008. SASOW 2008. Second IEEE International Conference (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) pp 156–161
ThompsonJ B, 2005, “The new visibility”Theory, Culture and Society2231–51
63.
ThriftNFrenchS, 2002, “The automatic production of space”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series27309–335
64.
WallerV, 2009, “Information systems ‘in the wild’: Supporting activity in the world”Behaviour and Information Technology28577–588
65.
WangZLiJZhaoYSetchiRTangJ, 2013, “A unified approach to matching semantic data on the Web”Knowledge-Based Systems39173–184
66.
WeiserM, 1991, “The computer for the 21st century”Scientific American26594–104
67.
WeishanZHansenK M, 2008, “Semantic web based self-management for a pervasive service middleware”, in Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, 2008. SASO '08. Second IEEE International Conference (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) pp 245–254
68.
WeishanZHansenK MFernandesJ, 2009, “Towards openworld software architectures with semantic architectural styles, components and connectors”, in Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 2009 14th IEEE International Conference (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) pp 40–49
69.
WilkenR, 2008, “Mobilizing place: Mobile media, peripatetics, and the renegotiation of urban places”Journal of Urban Technology1539–55
70.
WilliamsADourishP, 2006, “Imagining the city: The cultural dimensions of urban computing”Computer3938–43
71.
WilsonM W, 2012, “Location-based services, conspicuous mobility, and the location-aware future”Geoforum431266–1275
