Building on multisited ethnographic case studies, this paper seeks to contrastively compare the demonstration and articulation formats of two social science expert cultures—economics and anthropology—enrolled ‘in the wild’ of transnational environmental politics. How, the paper asks, do different social sciences come to be configured within, and do performative work upon, heterogeneous assemblages of global natures? In the first case US economists translate carbon markets into a world of Indian ecoprofessionals, across serious North–South conflicts in climate politics. In the second case a group of anthropologists, mobilized by Japanese bureaucratic elites, deploy their methods to assemble whaling cultures, as part of global biodiversity conflicts. Whereas the first case builds on existing arguments on the ‘performativity of economics' (Callon), the second case expands this agenda, noting how the noneconomic social sciences (eg, anthropology) may also be consequential in enacting particular nature-cultures. Theoretically, the paper situates these inquiries at the intersection of science and technology studies (STS) and political anthropology, in addressing the question—important to environmental expertise and politics—of how ‘local’ (particular) and ‘global’ (universal) claims are linked in efficacious ways in ‘other-than-Western’ contexts? Here, the argument will be that, despite their differences, economic and anthropological performances of global natures share certain formal (aesthetic) similarities, related to credible expert demonstrations in transnational environmental contexts. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of this claim for STS self-reflection on its politics of methods.
AgarwalANarainS, 1991Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi)
2.
AsdalK, 2008, “Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing”Geoforum39123–132
3.
BeaulieuAScharnhorstAWoutersP, 2007, “Not another case study: A middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of E-science”Science, Technology and Human Values32672–692
4.
BlokA, 2008, “Contesting global norms: Politics of identity in Japanese pro-whaling counter-mobilization”Global Environmental Politics8(2) 39–66
5.
BlokA, 2010, “Mapping the Super-Whale: Towards a mobile ethnography of situated globalities”Mobilities5507–528
6.
BlokA, 2011, “Clash of the eco-sciences: Carbon marketization, environmental NGOs, and performativity as politics”Economy and Society40451–476
7.
BoltanskiLThévenotL, 2006On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
8.
BraunB, 2006, “Environmental issues: Global natures in the space of assemblage”Progress in Human Geography30: 644–654
9.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge Ed. LawJ, (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–233
10.
CallonM, 1998a, “Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics”, in The Laws of the Markets Ed. CallonM, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–57
11.
CallonM, 1998b, “An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology”, in The Laws of the Markets (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 244–269
12.
CallonM, 2004, “Europe wrestling with technology”Economy and Society33(1) 121–134
13.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 535–548
14.
CallonMRabeharisoaV, 2003, “Research ‘in the wild’ and the shaping of new social identities”Technology in Society25193–204
15.
ChoyT K, 2005, “Articulated knowledges: Environmental forms after universality's demise”American Anthropologist1075–18
16.
CoaseR H, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics31–44
17.
DalesJ H, 1968Pollution, Property and Prices: An Essay in Policy-making and Economics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
18.
DemerittD, 2006, “Science studies, climate change, and the prospects for constructivist critique”Economy and Society35453–479
19.
DemerittD, 2009, “From externality to inputs and interference: Framing environmental research in geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series343–11
20.
EpsteinC, 2008The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-whaling Discourse (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
HineC, 2007, “Multi-sited ethnography as a middle range methodology for contemporary STS”Science, Technology and Human Values32652–671
22.
IrwinAMichaelM, 2003Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge (Open University Press, Maidenhead, Bucks)
23.
IshiiAOkuboA, 2007, “An alternative explanation of Japan's whaling diplomacy in the post-moratorium era”Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy10(1) 55–87
24.
JasanoffS, 1998, “The eye of everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson trial”Social Studies of Science28(5–6) 713–740
JensenC B, 2009, “Contexts for comparative relativism”, discussion draft, forthcoming in Common Knowledge
27.
KallandA, 1993, “Whale politics and green legitimacy: A critique of the anti-whaling campaign”Anthropology Today9(6) 3–7
28.
KallandA, 1998, “The anti-whaling campaigns and Japanese responses”, in Japanese Position on Whaling and the Anti-whaling Campaign (Institute of Cetacean Research, Tokyo) pp 11–26
29.
KishigamiN, 2008, “Trends in Japanese cultural anthropological research on whaling cultures”Japanese Review of Cultural Anthropology971–99
30.
CetinaK Knorr, 1999Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
KwaC, 2005, “Local ecologies and global science: Discourses and strategies of the international geosphere–biosphere programme”Social Studies of Science35923–950
32.
LatourB, 1998, “To modernize or to ecologize? That is the question”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds CastreeNBraunB W, (Routledge, London) pp 221–242
33.
LatourB, 2005Reassembling the Social (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
34.
LawJ, 2009, “Seeing Like a Survey”Cultural Sociology3239–256
35.
LawJ, 2011, “Collateral realities”, in The Politics of Knowledge Eds RubioF DBaertP, (Routledge, London) pp 156–178
36.
LawJMolA, 2001, “Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19609–621
37.
LienM E, 2004, “Dogs, whales and kangaroos: Transnational activism and food taboos”, in The Politics of Food Eds LienM ENerlichB, (Berg, Oxford) pp 179–197
38.
LohmannL, 2005, “Marketing and making carbon dumps: Commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation”Science as Culture14203–235
39.
MacKenzieD, 2009, “Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 440–455
40.
MarresN, 2008, “The making of climate publics: Eco-homes as material devices of publicity”Distinktion9(1) 27–45
41.
MarresN, 2012, “Experiment: The experiment in living”, in Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social Eds LuryCWakefordN, (Routledge, London) pp 76–95
42.
MartelloM LJasanoffS, 2004, “Introduction: Globalization and environmental governance”, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Eds JasanoffSMartelloM L, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–29
43.
MillerC A, 2004, “Climate science and the making of global political order”, in States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order Ed. JasanoffS, (Routledge, London) pp 46–66
44.
MullinM H, 1999, “Mirrors and windows: Sociocultural studies of human–animal relationships”, Annual Review of Anthropology28201–224
45.
OsborneTRoseN, 1999, “Do the social sciences create phenomena: The case of public opinion research”British Journal of Sociology50367–396
46.
PaehlkeR, 2001, “Environmental politics, sustainability and social science”Environmental Politics10(4) 1–22
47.
SlocumR, 2004, “Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: Strategies to bring climate change home”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22413–438
48.
StarkDParavelV, 2008, “PowerPoint in public: Digital technologies and the new morphology of demonstration”Theory, Culture and Society25(5) 30–55
49.
StrathernM, 2004Partial Connectionsupdated edition (Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA)
50.
TsingA L, 2005Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
51.
VossJ-P, 2007, “Innovation processes in governance: The development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument”Science and Public Policy34329–343
52.
WatanabeH, 2009Japan's Whaling: The Politics of Culture in Historical Perspective (Trans Pacific Press, Melbourne)
53.
WhatmoreS, 2009, “Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise”Progress in Human Geography331–12
