The incorporation of safety considerations into land-development control decisions associated with nonnuclear hazardous installations in a major metropolitan planning authority area in the United Kingdom is examined. The experience of the case-study authority over the last ten years is examined with reference to the operation of the consultation procedure whereby advice on safety issues is obtained from the Health and Safety Executive, and with reference to the impact that consideration of safety has had on land-use around hazardous sites. Evidence is presented of serious difficulties in planning for nonnuclear major hazard installations and of problems with past and existing consultation procedures. A further aim of the paper is to draw wider conclusions in relation to difficulties in land-use planning around hazardous installations in general. Topical and controversial planning considerations are raised within an empirical context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADC, 1979, “Matters causing concern to local authorities arising from the provisions of circular 1/72 relating to the control of development within the vicinity of hazardous installations” ADC circular number 1979/81, Association of District Councils, 25 Buckingham Gate, London SW1
2.
BarrellA C, 1981, “The work of the major hazards assessment unit” in Proceedings of Planning for Major Hazards Conference (Oyez, London) pp 35–43
3.
BarrellA CScottP J C, 1982, “The regulatory position—United Kingdom and elsewhere” in High Risk Safety Technology Ed. GreenA E (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 15–30
4.
ConsodineM, 1983, “A hazard assessment of the Morecambe Bay Gas Pipeline and Coastal Reception Terminal” in Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process IndustriesInstitution of Chemical Engineers (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 123–135
5.
CropperS A, 1982, “Theory and strategy in the study of planning processes—the uses of the case study”Environment and Planning B9341–357
6.
Department of Employment, 1975Flixborough disaster—report of the Court of Inquiry (ChairmanR JParkerQC) (HMSO, London)
7.
Department of the Environment, and Welsh Office, 1972, “Circular 1/72. Development involving the use of storage in bulk of hazardous material” (HMSO, London)
8.
Department of the Environment, and Welsh Office, 1982, “Circular 1982/26. Hazardous substances” (HMSO, London)
9.
Department of the Environment, and Welsh Office, 1984, “Circular 9/84. Planning controls over hazardous development” (HMSO, London)
10.
FischoffBSlovicPLichtensteinS, 1981, “Lay foibles and expert fables in judgements about risks” in Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, Volume 3 Eds O'RiordanTTurnerR K (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 161–202
11.
FloydP J, 1983, “Risk assessment and the planner” in Proceedings of Major Hazard Installations: Planning Implications and Problems Seminar Ed. PettsJ, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology, Loughborough, pp 20–30
12.
ForteP, 1981, “Planning: the problems posed by industrial hazard” unpublished B Phil dissertation, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne
13.
GoodmanG TRoweW D (Eds), 1979Energy Risk Management (Academic Press, London)
14.
GregoryR, 1971The Price of Amenity (Macmillan, London)
15.
GriffithsR F (Ed.), 1981Dealing with Risk (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
Health and Safety at Work Act, 1974Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 37 (HMSO, London)
18.
HMFI, 1979, “The fire and explosion at Braehead Container Depot, Renfrew, Jan. 4, 1977” HM Factory Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
19.
HMFI, 1982, “The explosion and fire at Chemstar Limited, Sept. 6, 1981” HM Factory Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
20.
HMFI, 1983, “The fire and explosions at B & R Hauliers, Salford on Sept. 25, 1982”HM Factory Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
21.
HSC, 1976, “Advisory Committee on Major Hazards. Report 1”Health and Safety Commission (HMSO, London)
22.
HSC, 1979, “Advisory Committee on Major Hazards. Report 2”Health and Safety Commission (HMSO, London)
23.
HSC, 1983, “Control of industrial major accident hazards: consultative document”Health and Safety Commission, Regina House, Old Marylebone Road, London NW1
24.
HSE, 1978, “Canvey: An investigation of potential hazards from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area”Health and Safety Executive (HMSO, London)
25.
HSE, 1980, “The fire and explosion at River Road, Barking, Essex, Jan. 21, 1980”Health and Safety Executive, 25 Chapel Street, London, W1
26.
HSE, 1981“Canvey: a second report: a review of potential hazards from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area three years after publication of the Canvey report”
27.
HSE, 1983, “HS (R) series 16. A guide to the notification of installations handling hazardous substances regulations 1982”Health and Safety Executive (HMSO, London)
28.
HytnerB, 1983, “Opinion of Benet Hytner, MA, QC, commissioned by Salford City Council as a result of the fire and explosion which occurred at Broughton Works, Halls Street, Salford”Salford City Council, Civic Centre, Chorley Road, Swinton, M27 2AD
29.
JohnsonE S, 1982, “Implications and effects—the planning officer” in Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances Regulations (Oyez, London)
MacGillS M, 1983, “Mossmorran—Braefoot Bay: Aspects of a risk debate” in Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, Volume 4 Eds O'RiordanTTurnerR K (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 267–295
32.
MacGillS MSnowballD J, 1983, “What use risk assessment?”Applied Geography3(3) 171–192
33.
MasserI, 1982, “The analysis of planning processes: Some methodological considerations”Environment and Planning B95–14
34.
PapeR P, 1983, “Major hazards work in HSE—a personal view”Loss Prevention Bulletin 51 (The Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby) pp 31–37
35.
PayneB J, 1981, “Dealing with hazard and risk in planning (1)” in Dealing with Risk Ed. GriffithsR F (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 77–88
36.
PearceD W, 1981, “Risk assessment: Use and misuse”Proceedings of Royal Society of London, Series A376181–192
37.
Preseli District Council, 1980, “Written statement (provisional) Milford/Neyland District Plan”Planning Department, Preseli District Council, Haverfordwest, Dyfed
38.
RamsayC GSylvester-EvansREnglishM A, 1982, “Siting and layout of major hazardous installations” in I Chem E Symposium Series 71. Proceedings of the Assessment of Major Hazards Conference (The Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby) pp 335–352
39.
Royal Society, 1981, “The assessment and perception of risk” (a collection of papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A3761–206
40.
Royal Society, 1983Risk Assessment: a study group report (The Royal Society, London)
41.
SnowballD JMacGillS M, 1984, “Coping with risk: The case of gas facilities in Scotland”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2343–360
42.
Statutory Instrument Number 1615, 1983, “The town and country planning general development (amendment) order 1983” (HMSO, London)
43.
Town and Country Planning Act, 1971Public General Acts — Elizabeth II chapter 78 (HMSO, London)
44.
WalkerG P, 1983, “Major hazards and development control” WP 377, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds
45.
WalshP M, 1979, “Major hazard premises, the problems of nearby developments” in Local Government Review143551–533, 560
46.
WoodC MLawrenceM, 1980, “The relationship of planning to major hazards: some observations from a pollution research unit survey”Pollution Research Unit, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester
