The measurement of spatial pattern is often undertaken using one of a number of single-number indices, such as the Gini coefficient, which may not illuminate certain aspects of the pattern involved—especially the degree to which the members of the reference group are spatially concentrated. We suggest an alternative approach based on a concentration profile which shows the degree to which a group is spatially concentrated according to a range of thresholds. This is illustrated with data on male unemployment in England and Wales in 1991, which also shows the importance of spatial scale to the study of concentrations and, potentially, to the formulation of spatially focused public policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dorling D and coauthors, 2001, “How much does place matter?”Environment and Planning A33, 1335–1369
2.
DuncanO DDuncanB, 1955, “Occupational stratification and residential distribution”American Journal of Sociology50, 493–503
3.
JahnJ ASchmidC FSchragC, 1947, “The measurement of ecological segregation”American Sociological Review12, 293–303
4.
JargowskyP A, 1997Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios and the American City (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
5.
JohnstonR JPoulsenM FForrestJ, 2001, “The geography of an EthniCity: Residential segregation of birthplace and language groups in Sydney, 1996”Housing Studies16, 569–594
6.
McCullochA, 2001, “Ward-level deprivation and individual social and economic outcomes in the British Household Panel Study”Environment and Planning A33, 667–684
7.
MartinD, 1998, “Optimizing census geography: The separation of collection and output geographies”International Journal of Geographical Information Science12, 673–658
8.
MasseyD S, 2001, “Residential segregation and neighborhood conditions in U.S. metropolitan areas”, in America Becoming: Racial Trends and their Consequences, Volume 1 Eds SmelserN JWilsonW JMitchellF (National Academy Press, Washington DC) pp 390–434
9.
MasseyD SDentonM A, 1988, “The dimensions of residential segregation”Social Forces67, 281–315
10.
MasseyD SDentonM A, 1989, “Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions”Demography26, 373–391
11.
OpenshawS, 1984The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (GeoBooks, Norwich)
12.
PastorM, 2001, “Geography and opportunity”, in America Becoming: Racial Trends and their Consequences, Volume 1 Eds SmelserN JWilsonW JMitchellF (National Academy Press, Washington DC) 435–467
13.
PeachC, 1996, “Does Britain have ghettos?”Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, New Series21, 216–235
14.
PhilpottT L, 1978The Slum and the Ghetto: Neighborhood Deterioration and Middle Class Reform, Chicago, 1880–1930 (Oxford University Press, New York)
15.
PoulsenM FJohnstonR J, 2000, “The ghetto model and ethnic concentration in Australian cities”Urban Geography21, 26–44
16.
PoulsenM FJohnstonR JForrestJ, 2001, “Intraurban ethnic enclaves: Introducing a knowledge-based classification method”Environment and Planning A33, 2071–2082
17.
PoulsenM FJohnstonR JForrestJ, 2002, “Plural cities and ethnic enclaves: Introducing a measurement procedure for comparative study”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26, 229–243
18.
VoasDWilliamsonP, 2000, “The scale of dissimilarity: Concepts, measurement and an application to socio-economic variation across England and Wales”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series25, 465–482
19.
WoodsR I, 1976, “Aspects of the scale problem in the calculation of segregation indices: London and Birmingham 1961 and 1971”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie67, 169–174
20.
YoungI M, 2000Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
