Urban life in the towns of the subarctic regions is affected by the severity of the local climate, which must be taken into account in urban planning. Previous studies show that the use of climate knowledge in urban planning is hindered by different constraints. In this study we focus specifically on the problems of incorporating microclimate factors into the urban planning practices in northern Sweden. We rely on a literature study and focus on interviews as our study methods. Some of the major problems identified are the lack of design knowledge relevant to a cold climate, lack of user-friendly tools to analyze microclimate, overlooking the potential uses of local climate, and lack of support from politicians. The problems related to knowledge development and the lack of tools for microclimate analysis are discussed further. In terms of knowledge issues, the planners' awareness of climate objectives achievable at different planning scales needs to be improved. There should be further research into the effect of urban form on the use of snow and on snow-removal activities. Tools for microclimate analysis should become more user friendly for planners. More importantly, planners need methods that combine different microclimate analyses and offer a complete assessment of a given design scheme.
BergströmAMagnussonR, 2003, “Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice37649–666
2.
BeyersMWaechterB, 2008, “Modeling transient snowdrift development around complex three-dimensional structures”Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics961603–1615
3.
BlockenBCarmelietJ, 2004, “Pedestrian wind environment around buildings: Literature review and practical examples”Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science28107–159
4.
BørveA B, 1988, “Settlement and housing design with special regard to local climatic conditions in cold and polar regions—examples from Northern Norway”Energy and Buildings1133–39
5.
Boverket, 2005Legislation: The Planning and Building Act, the Law on Technical Qualities of Buildings, the Environmental Code with Ordinances of Relevance: Current Wording June 1st 2004Boverket, The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, Karlskrona, Sweden
6.
BrandenburgCMatzarakisAArnbergerA, 2007, “Weather and cycling—a first approach to the effects of weather conditions on cycling”Meteoroligical Applications1461–67
7.
CapelutoI GYezioroAShavivE, 2003, “Climatic aspects in urban design-a case study”Building Environment38827–835
8.
ChenQ, 2004, “Using computational tools to factor wind into architectural environment design”Energy and Building361197–1209
9.
EgeliusM, 1988Ralph Erskine, Arkitekt (Byggförlaget, Stockholm)
10.
EliassonI, 2000, “The use of climate knowledge in urban planning”Landscape Urban Planning4831–44
11.
EliassonIKnezIWesterbergUThorssonSLindbergF, 2007, “Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city”Landscape Urban Planning8272–84
ErellE, 2011, “The application of urban climate research in the design of cities”Advances in Building Energy Research295–121
14.
FlynnB SDanaG SSearsJAultman-HallL, 2012, “Weather factor impacts on commuting to work by bicycle”Preventative Medicine54122–124
15.
HebbertMWebbB, 2011, “Towards a liveable urban climate: Lessons from Stuttgart”, in Liveable Cities: Urbanising World: ISOCARP Review Eds GossopCNanS, (International Society of City and Regional Planners, The Hague) pp 132–150
16.
MerriamS B, 2009Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
17.
MillsG, 2006, “Progress toward sustainable settlements: A role for urban climatology”Theoretical and Applied Climatology8469–76
18.
Miranda-MorenoLNosalT, 2011, “Weather or not to cycle: Temporal trends and impact of weather on cycling in an urban environment”Transportation Research Recordnumber 2247, 42–52
19.
MurakamiS, 2006, “Environmental design of outdoor climate based on CFD”Fluid Dynamics Research38108–126
20.
NankervisM, 1999, “The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice33417–431
21.
NikolopoulouMLykoudisS, 2006, “Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Analysis across different European countries”Building and Environment411455–1470
22.
PeelM CFinlaysonB LMcMahonT A, 2007, “Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification”Hydrology and Earth System Sciences111633–1644
23.
PressmanN, 1985Reshaping Winter Cities: Concepts, Strategies and Trends (University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo)
PressmanN, 2004, Shaping Cities for Winter: Climatic Comfort and Sustainable Design (Winter Cities Association, Prince George, BC)
26.
ReiterS, 2010, “Assessing wind comfort in urban planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37857–873
27.
RenCNgE YKatzschnerL, 2011, “Urban climatic map studies: A review”International Journal of Climatology312213–2233
28.
RyserLHalsethG, 2008, “Institutional barriers to incorporating climate responsive design in commercial redevelopment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3534–55
SundsbøP ABangB, 2000, “Snow drift control in residential areas—field measurements and numerical simulations”, in Snow Engineering: Recent Advances and Developments: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Snow Engineering: Trondheim, Norway Ed. Hjorth-HansenE, (Balkema, Rotterdam) pp 377–382
33.
TominagaYOkazeTMochidaA, 2011, “CFD modeling of snowdrift around a building: An overview of models and evaluation of a new approach”Building Environment46899–910
34.
YinR K, 1994Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
35.
ZrudloL R, 1988, “A climatic approach to town planning in the Arctic”Energy and Building1141–63
