It is a challenge to find the appropriate level of spatial resolution in transport modelling. While the zone system has substantial influence on model results, the resolution and design of zones is rarely analyzed systematically, and even less commonly adjusted to a specific modelling need. In this paper we present a new methodology to automatically create a new zone system based on the quadtree algorithm specific to transport modelling. Gradual raster cells are generated, where smaller raster cells tend to be used in urban areas and larger raster cells dominate in low-density, rural areas. As changing the zonal resolution affects the number of intrazonal and interzonal trips, an algorithm has been developed that adjusts intrazonal trips in line with the network resolution. Trip tables of a travel demand model for the state of Georgia, USA were disaggregated using this new zone system of gradual raster cells. The traffic assignment results validate significantly better than when using the original zone system.
Atkins, 2011 Development of Statewide Model Report. Model v2.0 Draft Report Georgia Department of Transport, Atlanta, GA
3.
Balmer M, Meister K, Rieser M, Nagel K, Axhausen K W, 2008, “Agenda-based simulation of travel demand: structure and computational performance of MATSim-T”, paper presented at 2nd TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Modelling, Portland, OR, http://www.matsim.org/uploads/BalmerELA12008ITM.pdf
BattyMXieYSunZ (1999) “Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata”. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems23: 205–233
6.
CockingsSHarfootAMartinDHornbyD (2011) “Maintaining existing zoning systems using automated zone-design techniques: methods for creating the 2011 Census output geographies for England and Wales”. Environment and Planning A43: 2399–2418
7.
DingC (1998) “The GIS-based human-interactive TAZ design algorithm: examining the impacts of data aggregation on transportation-planning analysis”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25: 601–616
8.
FinkelRBentleyJ L (1974) “Quad trees a data structure for retrieval on composite keys”. Acta Informatica4: 1–9
9.
FlowerdewRFengZ QManleyD (2007) “Constructing data zones for Scottish neighbourhood statistics”. Computers Environment and Urban Systems31: 76–90
10.
Hagen-ZankerAJinY (2012) “A new method of adaptive zoning for spatial interaction models”. Geographical Analysis44: 281–301
11.
HargroveWHoffmanF (2004) “Potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions”. Environmental Management34: S39–S60
12.
HaynesRDarasKReadingRJonesA (2007) “Modifiable neighbourhood units, zone design and residents’ perceptions”. Health and Place13: 812–825
LovelaceRBallasDWatsonM (2014) “A spatial microsimulation approach for the analysis of commuter patterns: from individual to regional levels”. Journal of Transport Geography34: 282–296
15.
McNallyM G (2000) “The four-step model”. In: HensherD AButtonK J (eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 35–52
16.
MartínezL MViegasJ MSilvaE A (2009) “A traffic analysis zone definition: a new methodology and algorithm”. Transportation36: 581–599
17.
MoeckelR (2009) “Simulation of firms as a planning support system to limit urban sprawl of jobs”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36: 883–905
18.
MoeckelR (2013) “Firm location choice versus job location choice in microscopic simulation models”. In: PagliaraFde BokMSimmondsDWilsonA (eds) Employment Location in Cities and Regions. Models and Applications, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 223–242
19.
OpenshawS (1977) “A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2: 459–472
20.
OpenshawS (1984) The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Norwich: Geo BooksConcepts and Techniques in Modern Geography 38
21.
OpenshawSRaoL (1995) “Algorithms for reengineering 1991 Census geography”. Environment and Planning A27: 425–446
22.
OrtúzarJ de DWillumsenL G (1990) Modelling Transport, Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley
23.
PendyalaR MKonduriK CChiuY-CHickmanMNohHWaddellPWangLYouDGardnerB (2013) “An integrated land use-transport model system with dynamic time-dependent activitytravel microsimulation”. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board number 230319–27
24.
SametHWebberR E (1985) “Storing a collection of polygons using quadtrees”. ACM Transactions on Graphics4: 182–222
25.
SchellingT C (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: W W Norton
SpiekermannKWegenerM (2000) “Freedom from the tyranny of zones: towards new GIS-based models”. In: FotheringhamA SWegenerM (eds) Spatial Models and GIS. New Potential and New Models, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 45–61
28.
TribbyC PZandbergenP A (2012) “High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility”. Applied Geography34: 345–355
29.
Venter C J, Lamprecht T, Badenhorst W, 2006, “Demographic and regional economic modeling using stochastic allocation in the City of Johannesburg”, in Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-Rom Transport Research Board, Washington, DC
30.
ViegasJ MMartinezL MSilvaE A (2009) “Effects of the modifiable areal unit problem on the delineation of traffic analysis zones”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36: 625–643
31.
Waddell P, Moore T, Edwards S, 1998, “Exploiting parcel-level GIS for land use modeling”, in ASCE Conference. Transportation, Land Use, and Air Quality: Making the Connection Eds S Easa, D Samdahl (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA) pp 632-641
32.
WegenerM (1982) “Modeling urban decline: a multilevel economic-demographic model for the Dortmund Region”. International Regional Science Review7: 217–241
33.
WegenerM (2011) “From macro to micro—how much micro is too much?”. Transport Reviews31: 161–177
34.
ZhangMWuW M (2011) “A two dimensional hydrodynamic and sediment transport model for dam break based on finite volume method with quadtree grid”. Applied Ocean Research33: 297–308
