This is a report of the dynamic relationship between information technology (IT) and architectural practice. In this report, the attitudes and opinions of practitioners gathered through extensive recorded interviews are summarised, and these are compared with the findings of other studies. The report is compiled from the point of view of an understanding of praxis—appropriating practice as preceding theory as the model for understanding. We thereby connect what is going on in IT with concepts currently under discussion in postmodern thought and in the tradition of philosophical pragmatism. We highlight several of the major options identified by practitioners in their use of IT, including practising without computers, substituting computers for traditional tasks, delivering traditional services in an innovative way through IT, and developing new services with IT. We also demonstrate how firms are changing and are being shaped by the market for architectural services. One of the major areas of change is in how IT and related resources are managed. We consider how the role of the practitioner as an individual in a firm is changing with changes in IT, and how different prognoses about the future of IT in practice are influenced by certain dominant metaphors. Our conclusion is that IT is best understood and appropriated when it is seen as fitting into a dynamic field or constellation of technologies and practices. Such an orientation enables the reflective practitioner to confront what is really going on, as IT interacts with practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AR, 1984, “Round table: Computer use in the small architectural firm”Architectural Record May, pp 39–53
2.
AR, 1990, “Beyond computers as pencils”Architectural Record November, pp 28–31
3.
AtkinBGillM, 1986A Study of CAD in the U.K. Construction IndustryConstruction Industry Computing Association, Cambridge, England
4.
AunglesS, (Ed.), 1991Information Technology in Australia (New South Wales University Press, Sydney)
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1991Architectural Services Industry, 1987–88: Supplementary Statistics for ArchitectsBelconnen, Australian Capital Territory
6.
BadhamR, 1991Computers, Design and Manufacturing: The Challenge (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
7.
BenediktM, 1991, “Introduction”, in Cyberspace: First Steps Ed. BenediktMichael (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 2–25
8.
BernsteinR, 1991The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizon of Modernity/Postmodernity (Polity Press, Cambridge)
9.
BravermanH, 1975Labour and Monopoly Capitalism (Monthly Review Press, New York)
10.
CowdroyR M, 1985Clients' Perceptions of Architects' Performance (Board of Architects of New South Wales, Sydney)
11.
CoyneR D, 1995Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
CoyneR DMcLaughlinSNewtonSSudweeksFHaynesDJumaniA, 1996, “Computers in Practice: A survey of computers in architectural practice”, report, Department of Architecture, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
14.
CrawfordPHutchinsonJ, 1990A Study of Means of Maintaining and Developing Professional Competence Throughout a Career as an ArchitectBoard of Architects of New South Wales, 3 Manning Street, Potts Point 2011, NSW, Australia
15.
CuffD, 1991Architecture: The Story of Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
16.
DarkeJ, 1979, “The primary generator and the design process”Design Studies1(1) 36–44
17.
DeanJOlleyH, 1988The Market for Architectural Services—An Initial InvestigationRoyal Australian Institute of Architects National Education Division, Red Hill, Canberra
18.
DillJ CPitmanJ H, 1985, “Computers: Evaluate your options”Architectural Record October, pp 45–47
HarrisC L, 1989, “Office automation: Making it pay off”, in Computers in the Human Context: Information Technology, Productivity and People Ed. ForesterT, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 367–376
31.
HeideggerM, 1977, “The question concerning technology”, in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings Ed. KrellD, (Harper and Row, New York) pp 287–317
32.
HeimM, 1993The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality (Oxford University Press, New York)
33.
HelselS KRothJ P, (Eds), 1991Virtual Reality: Theory, Practice and Promise (Meckler, Westport, CT)
34.
HillierBMusgroveJO'SullivanP, 1972, “Knowledge and design”, in Environmental Design: Research and Practice Ed. MitchellW J, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 29.3.1–29.3.14
35.
JayM, 1984Adorno (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
36.
JonesB, 1982Sleepers, Wake! Technology and the Future of Work (Oxford University Press, Melbourne)
37.
KayA, 1991, “Computer, networks and education”Scientific American265(3) 100–107
38.
KindonD, 1979Marketing Architectural Services, Part 1: The Marketing AuditRoyal Australian Institute of Architects Information Division, Manuka, Australia
39.
KishE, 1991, “CAD and the profession”Progressive Architecture May, pp 142–143
40.
KranzbergM, 1989, “The information age”, in Computers in the Human Context: Information Technology, Productivity and People Ed. ForesterT, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 19–32
41.
KuhnT S, 1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
42.
McLuhanMFioreQ, 1967The Medium is the Massage (Bantam Books, New York)
43.
OlleyH, 19921990 Profile of the Architectural ProfessionRoyal Australian Institute of Architects, National Division, Canberra
44.
PetersTWatermanR, 1982In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-run Companies (Harper and Row, New York)
45.
PitmanJ HDillJ C, 1984, “Computers: The need for graphic standards”Architectural Record February, pp 23–27
46.
RadfordA D, 1988Computers in Australian Architectural PracticesRoyal Australian Institute of Architects National Education Division, Red Hill, Canberra
47.
RafaeliSLa RoseR J, 1993, “Electronic bulletin boards and ‘public goods’ explanations of collaborative mass media”Communications Research20277–297
48.
RectorR A, 1990, “The economics of rationality and the rationality of economics”, in Economics and Hermeneutics Ed. LavoiD, (Routledge, London) pp 195–235
49.
RheingoldH, 1991Virtual Reality (Summit Books, New York)
50.
RheingoldH, 1993The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
51.
RIBA, 1992Strategic Study of the Profession (Royal Institute of British Architects, London)
52.
RooneyJ, 1987, “Representing objects”, in Principles of Computer-aided Design Eds. RooneyJSteadmanP, (Pitman, London) pp 13–37
53.
SaintA, 1983The Image of the Architect (Yale University, New Haven, CT)
54.
ShuggC, 1993, “Gaining a positional advantage with CADD”Architecture Australia January-February, pp 61–63
55.
SidhuJ, 1990, “The use of CADD in architectural practices in Sydney”, unpublished masters thesis, Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, Australia
56.
StevensG, 1991, “CAD and the profession”Progressive Architecture72141–142
57.
StinyGGipsJ, 1978Algorithmic Aesthetics: Computer Models for Criticism and Design in the Arts (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
58.
StinyGMitchellW J, 1978, “The Palladian grammar”Environment and Planning B55–18
59.
TeicholtzE, 1991, “Scanning the scanners”Progressive Architecture7255–57
60.
TeicholtzE, 1992Computer-Aided Facility Management (McGraw-Hill, New York)
61.
ThompsonW, 1991, “Computer techniques for making photo-realistic presentations”Progressive Architecture February, pp 39–41
62.
WeiserM, 1991, “The computer for the 21st century”Scientific American265(3) 66–75
63.
WinogradTFloresF, 1986Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (Albex, Norwood, NJ)
