AlexanderE R, 1992Approaches to Planning: Introducing Current Planning Theories, Concepts and Issues (Gordon and Breach, New York)
2.
AlexanderE R, 1996a, “Doing the impossible: Notes for a general theory of planning”, paper presented at the ASCP–AESOP Joint International Congress, Toronto, 25–28 July; copy available from the author
3.
AlexanderE R, 1996b, “After rationality: Towards a contingency theory for planning”, in Explorations in Planning Theory Eds MandelbaumSMazzaLBurchellR, (Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 45–64
4.
CookeP, 1983Theories of Planning and Spatial Development (Hutchinson, London)
5.
deNeufvilleJ I, 1983, “Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap”Journal of Planning Education and Research635–45
6.
DyckmanJ W, 1983, “Reflections on planning practice in an age of reaction”Journal of Planning Education and Research35–12
7.
FlyvbergB, 1992, “Aristotle, Foucault and progressive phronesis”Planning Theory7/865–93
8.
GlazerE MAbelsonH HGarrisonK N, 1983Putting Knowledge to Use (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
9.
HallP, 1989, “The turbulent eighth decade: Challenges to American city planning”Journal of the American Planning Association55275–282
10.
HealeyP, 1996, “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23217–234
11.
HemmensG C, 1980, “New directions in planning theory”Journal of the American Planning Association55275–282
12.
HillierJ, 1995, “The unwritten law of planning theory: Common sense”Journal of Planning Education and Research14292–296
13.
InnesJ E, 1995, “Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice”Journal of Planning Education and Research14183–189
14.
KaufmanSSimonsR, 1995, “Quantitative and research methods in planning: Are schools teaching what practitioners practice?”Journal of Planning Education and Research15(1) 17–33
15.
LowN, 1991Planning, Politics and the State (Unwin Hyman, London)
16.
PoultonM C, 1991a, “The case for a positive theory of planning. Part 1: What is wrong with planning theory?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design18225–232
17.
PoultonM C, 1991b, “The case for a positive theory of planning. Part 2: A positive theory of planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design18263–275