In this paper we examine the potential of pervasive computing to create widespread sousveillance, which will complement surveillance, through the development of life-logs—sociospatial archives that document every action, every event, every conversation, and every material expression of an individual's life. Reflecting on emerging technologies, life-log projects, and artistic critiques of sousveillance, we explore the potential social, political, and ethical implications of machines that never forget. We suggest, given that life-logs have the potential to convert exterior generated oligopticons to an interior panopticon, that an ethics of forgetting needs to be developed and built into the development of life-logging technologies. Rather than seeing forgetting as a weakness or a fallibility, we argue that it is an emancipatory process that will free pervasive computing from burdensome and pernicious disciplinary effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdeyP, 2004, “Surveillance at the airport: Surveilling mobility/mobilising surveillance”Environment and Planning A361365–1380
2.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities: Re-imagining the Urban (Polity Press, Cambridge)
3.
BallK, 2003, “Categorizing the workers: Electronic surveillance and social ordering in the call centers”, in Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination Ed. LyonD (Routledge, London) pp 201–225
4.
BannonL, 2006, “Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: The duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing”Co Design23–15
5.
BeckerH, 1952, “Science, culture, and society”Philosophy of Science19273–287
6.
BlanchetteJ-FJohnsonD G, 2002, “Data retention and the panoptic society: The social benefits of forgetfulness”The Information Society1833–45
7.
BogardW, 1996The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
FortyA, 1999, “Introduction”, in The Art of Forgetting Eds FortyAKuchlerS (Berg, Oxford) pp 1–18
17.
FrigoA, 2004, “Storing, indexing and retrieving my autobiography”, in Proceedings of Pervasive 2004 Workshop on Memory and Sharing of Experiences 20 April, Vienna, pp 52–56, http://www.ii.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/∼sumi/pervasive04
LeyshonAThriftN, 1999, “Lists come alive: Electronic systems of knowledge and the rise of credit-scoring in retail banking”Economy and Society28434–466
25.
LianosMDouglasM, 2000, “Dangerization and the end of deviance: The institutional environment”British Journal of Criminology40261–278
26.
LowenthalD, 1999, “Preface”, in The Art of Forgetting Eds FortyAKuchlerS (Berg, Oxford) pp xi–xiii
27.
LyonD, 2003, “Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies”, in Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination Ed. LyonD (Routledge, London) pp 13–30
MannSNolanJWellmanB, 2003, “Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments”Surveillance and Society1331–355
30.
MarxG T, 1999, “Measuring everything that moves: The new surveillance at work”, in The Workplace and Deviance Research in the Sociology of Work, volume 8, Eds SimpsonISimpsonR (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 165–189
31.
NackF, 2005, “Lifelogging: Capturing every moment of your life”IEEE Multimedia January - March, 4–7
ThriftN, 2004, “Movement-space: The changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness”Economy and Society33582–604
40.
ThriftNFrenchS, 2002, “The automatic production of space”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series27309–335
41.
TillRHandD, 2003, “Behavioral models of credit card usage”Journal of Applied Statistics301201–1220
