Agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS) has been a part of geospatial sciences for over a decade. Most research activities so far have concentrated on either extending complexity theory to spatially explicit phenomena, or on designing computational models and software tools. Only a few of these activities have focused on using ABMS for spatially explicit modeling of real-world policy scenarios. In this paper we present a realistic application of ABMS to simulating alternative futures for a small community in Washington State, USA. We develop an ABMS assessment benchmark that comprehensively covers diverse aspects of a good operational agent-based model. Using an ABMS software tool-CommunityViz Policy Simulator-we generate future development scenarios in the municipality of Chelan, WA based on the County and the City Comprehensive Growth Plans. Simulation results are compared with Washington State projections for growth-management planning. The indication of the highest probability locations of urban growth in the studied community is crucial for environmental and economic planning and decisionmaking. Endangered salmon protection and recreational and retirement influxes of people from the Puget Sound metropolitan area have a direct impact on future growth of the region. The bottom-up microsimulation allows for interposition of individual decisions and actions into forecasting option generation. The ‘heterogeneity, adaptability, and tractability’ benchmark is instrumental in evaluating CommunityViz Policy Simulator and outlining possible challenges for future development of applied agent-based models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarwalCGreenG MGroveJ MEvansT PSchweikC M, 2002A Review and Assessment of Land-use Change Models: Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice General Technical Report, NE-297, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA
2.
AndersonJ, 2002, “Providing a broad spectrum of agents in spatially explicit simulation models: The GenSim approach”, in Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modeling Techniques Ed. GimblettR H (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 21–58
3.
AxtellR L, 2003The New Coevolution of Information Science and Social Science: From Software Agents to Artificial Societies and Back or How More Computing Became Different Computing working paper, Brookings Institution, http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/compsoc.axtell.pdf
4.
BattyM, 1976, “Conclusions”, in Urban Modelling Algorithms, Calibrations, Predictions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 353–357
5.
BattyM, 2004, “Dissecting the streams of planning history: Technology versus policy through models”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31326–330
BenensonITorrensP M, 2004Geosimulation Automata-based Modeling of Urban Phenomena (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
8.
BenensonIAronovichSNoamS, 2005, “Let's talk objects; generic methodology for urban high-resolution simulation”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems29424–453
9.
BergerTCouclelisHMansonS MParkerD C, 2002a, “Agent based models of LUCC”, in Agent-based Models of Land Use and Land Cover Change Eds ParkerD CBergerTMansonS M, Land Use and Cover Change (LUCC) report series no. 6, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Indiana University, pp 1–2
10.
BergerTGoodchildMJanssenM AMansonS MNajlisRParkerD C, 2002b, “Methodological considerations for agent-based modeling of land-use and land-cover change”, in Agent-based Models of Land Use and Land Cover Change Eds ParkerD CBergerTMansonS M, LUCC report series no. 6, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Indiana University, pp 7–25
11.
BernardR N, 2000Policy Simulator: A Decision Support System for Local Governments presentation at RAND Workshop on Complexity and Public Policy, September 2000, Arlington, Virginia, http://www.rand.org/scitech/stpi/Complexity/bernard.pdf
12.
BernardR N, 2002Policy Simulator: A Decision Support System for Local Government (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, New York)
13.
BirchD, 1976Overview of the Model (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
BirchDAtkinsonRSandstromSStackL, 1974The New Heaven Laboratory: A Test-bed for Planning (DC Heath, Lexington, MA)
15.
BoydSChanR, 2003, “Placemaking tools for community action”, CONCERN Inc., Environmental Simulation Center, Denver Regional Office of the US Department of Energy, Denver
16.
BrailR K, 2004, “Planning support systems evolving: When the rubber hits the road”, in Complex Artificial Environments Ed. PortugaliJ (Springer, New York) pp 307–316
BrydenJ MHartJ K, 2001, “Dynamics of rural areas (DORA) project: international comparison”, The Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research, University of Aberdeen, http://www.abdn.ac.uk/arkleton/doradocs/icfinal.pdf
20.
CastiJ L, 1997Would-be Worlds How Simulation is Changing the Frontiers of Science (John Wiley, New York)
City of Chelan, 1998, “City of Chelan comprehensive land use plan” with 2002 updates, copy available from the City of Chelan, 135 East Johnson, PO Box 1669, Chelan, WA 98816
23.
City of Chelan, 2000, “Chelan County comprehensive plan”, amended 12-2002, copy available from the City of Chelan, 135 East Johnson, PO Box 1669, Chelan, WA 98816
24.
ClarkeK C, 2004, “The limits of simplicity: Toward geocomputational honesty in urban modeling”, in Geodynamics Eds AtkinsonPFoodyGDarbySWuF (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL)
25.
CommunityViz, 2002, “Policy simulator”, version 1.3 help system, The Orton Family Foundation, PO Box 295 (3814 Main Street), Manchester Village, VT 05254
26.
CouclelisH, 1989, “Macrostructure and microbehavior in a metropolitan area”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16141–154
27.
CouclelisH, 2002a, “Modeling frameworks, paradigms, and approaches”, in Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling Eds ClarkeK CParksB ECraneM P (Longman, New York) pp 36–50
28.
CouclelisH, 2002b, “Why I no longer work with agents: A challenge for ABMs of human—environment interactions”, in Agent-based Models of Land Use and Land Cover Change Eds ParkerD CBergerTMansonS M, LUCC report series no. 6, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Indiana University, pp 3–5
29.
DownsA, 2000Dealing Effectively With Fast Growth The Brookings Institution Policy Brief 67, November, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
30.
DukeR D, 1975METROPOLIS: The Urban Systems Game (Gamed Simulations, New York)
31.
FeldtA, 1972CLUG Community Land Use Game Player's Manual with Selected Readings (Free Press, New York)
32.
GimblettR H (Ed.), 2002Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modeling Techniques (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
33.
GuhathakurtaS, 2002, “Urban modeling as storytelling: Using simulation models as a narrative”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29895–911
34.
IssermanA M, 2001, “Competitive advantages of rural America in the next century”International Regional Science Review2438–58
35.
KammanJ, 2002, “3.1 million more people likely in Arizona by 2020”, Census 2000 special report, www.azcentral.com
36.
KwartlerMBernardR N, 2001, “CommunityViz: An integrated planning support system”, in Planning Support Systems Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools Eds BrailR KKlostermanR E (ESRI, New York)
37.
LeeD B, 1973, “Requiem for large-scale models”Journal of the American Institute of Planners39163–177
38.
MeierR LDukeR D, 1975, “Gaming-simulation for urban planning”, reprinted from Journal of the American Institute of Planners (1966), in Gaming-simulation: Rationale, Design, and Applications Eds GreenblatC SDukeR D (John Wiley, New York) pp 334–353
39.
MeyerM DMillerE J, 2001, “Urban activity system analysis”, in Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision Oriented Approachsecond edition Eds MeyerM DMillerE J (McGraw-Hill, New York) pp 333–384
40.
MillerE JHuntJ DAbrahamJ ESalviniP A, 2004, “Microsimulating urban systems”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems289–44
41.
MoulinBChakerWGancetJ, 2004, “PADI-Simul: An agent-based geosimulation software supporting the design of geographic spaces”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems28387–420
ParkerD CMansonS MJanssenM AHoffmanM JDeadmanP, 2003, “Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land use and land cover change: A review”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93314–337
45.
SimonH A, 1977, “The process of management decision”, in The New Science of Management Decision (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 39–81
46.
TorrensP M, 2003, “Cellular automata and multi-agent systems as planning support tools”, in Planning Support Systems in Practice Eds GeertmanSStillwellJ (Springer, New York) pp 203–222
WaddellP, 2000, “Towards a behavioral integration of land use and transportation modeling”, paper presented at the 9th International Association for Travel Behavior Research Conference, Queensland, Australia, July, copy available from http://www.urbanism.org/papers/index.shtml
WDFW, 2002, “Salmonid stock inventory: water resource inventory area 47”, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, http://www.wdfw.wa.gov
51.
WesterveltJ D, 2002, “Geographic information systems and agent-based modeling”, in Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modeling Techniques Ed. GimblettR H (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 83–103
52.
XiangW-NClarkK C, 2003, “The use of scenarios in land-use planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30885–909
