Previously, GIS-based visibility analysis has been conducted mainly in two dimensions, based on the concept of an isovist in the built environment or the concept of a viewshed in terrain and landscape analysis. The Viewsphere, a GIS approach towards 3D visibility analysis is proposed for measuring visible urban space quantitatively in a way that is different from its predecessors, the isovist and the viewshed. A test case of Singapore's urban space was conducted by evaluating the visibility of three alternative urban design scenarios and their potential impacts on the visual quality of open space. Both directional and nondirectional approaches were applied to the mapping of visibility based on the 2D and 3D indices. The proposition that 3D visibility indices are more effective than 2D indices was verified. The findings show that the 3D indices are sensitive to the changes of z-dimension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleyardD, 1976Planning a Pluralist City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
BattyM, 2001, “Exploring isovist fields: Space and shape in architectural and urban morphology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28123–150
3.
BattyMRanaS, 2004, “The automatic definition and generation of axial lines and axial maps”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31615–640
4.
BenediktM L, 1979, “To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields”Environment and Planning B647–65
5.
BosselmannP, 1998Representation of Places: Reality and Realism in City Design (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
BrattSBoothB, 2002Using ArcGis 3D Analysis (ESRI, Redlands, CA)
DreyfussH, 1993The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design (Whitney Library of Design, New York)
9.
Fisher-GewirtzmanDWagnerI A, 2003, “Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3037–49
10.
Fisher-GewirtzmanDBurtMTzamirY, 2003, “A 3-D visual method for comparative evaluation of dense built-up environments”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30575–587
11.
Fisher-GewirtzmanDPinslyD SWagnerI ABurtM, 2005, “View-oriented three-dimensional visual analysis models for the urban environment”Urban Design International1023–37
PutraS YYangP P JLiW, 2005, “GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for a high-density urban living environment”, in Proceedings of 5th China Urban Housing Conference copy available from the author
21.
RanaSBattyM, 2004, “Visualising the structure of architectural open space based on shape analysis”International Journal of Architectural Computing1123–132
22.
RattiC, 2002Urban Analysis for Environmental Prediction PhD thesis, University of Cambridge
23.
SouzaL C LRodriguesD SMendesJ F G, 2003, “A 3D-GIS extension for sky view factors assessment in urban environment”, in Proceedings of Computers for Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference (CUPUM 2003) Sendai, https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/2299/1/9a2.pdf
24.
TandyC R V, 1967, “The isovist method of landscape survey”, in Methods of Landscape Analysis Ed. MurrayH C, Landscape Research Group, PO Box 53, Horspath, Oxford, OX33 1WX
25.
TellerJ, 2003, “A spherical metric for the field-oriented analysis of complex urban open spaces”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30339–356
26.
TurnerA, 2003, “Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30657–676
27.
TurnerADoxaMO'SullivanDPennA, 2001, “From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28103–121
28.
YangP P JPutraS YLiW, 2005, “Impacts of density and typology on design strategies and perceptual quality of urban space”, in Proceedings of Map Asia 2005 Conference in Jakarta copy available from the author
