This paper investigates the applicability of knowledge domain mapping for analyzing political science data. Utilizing metaphorical-space models grounded on political science theory, and applying sound cartographic visualization techniques, we demonstrate the construction and analysis of knowledge domain maps for exploring voting behaviour in Switzerland. We digitally transformed the results of Swiss popular referenda of the last twenty years to generate a 3-dimensional semantic space representing the current political landscape of Switzerland. The whole country is depicted in this semantic political space at various spatial scales. Locations in this spatialization represent aggregated voting outcomes from cities, regions, and provinces. Special attention was given to the interpretation of the resulting spatial configuration. This includes the assignment of meaning to the axes of the 3D space, depicted in two dimensions. Armed with political science theory locations in the voting behaviour space can be analyzed and the resulting political pattern can be interpreted meaningfully. The spatialized views were disseminated to the public after recent Swiss elections. The initial feedback from domain specialists and decision-makers alike has been very encouraging. Measured by high number of substantive reactions and wide-spread feedback on these spatializations of voting behaviour one could deduce that these abstract views were readily accepted and understood by public administrators, political party leaders, and the politically interested public. Based on these experiences we conclude the paper with a first attempt at identifying design recommendation for spatializing multidimensional political datasets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJA, 1987Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society (Allen and Unwin, London)
2.
AgnewJA, 1996, “Mapping politics: How context counts in electoral geography”Political Geography15129–146
3.
AldenderferMSBlashfieldRK, 1987Cluster Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
4.
BaileyTCCatrellAC, 1995Interactive Spatial Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
5.
BeckU, 1984Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)
6.
BlauPM, 1977Inequality and Heterogeneity (Free Press, New York)
7.
BörnerKChenCBoyackK, 2003, “Visualizing knowledge domains”Annual Review of Information Science and Technology37179–255
8.
BourdieuP, 1979La Distinction (Édition de Minuit, Paris)
9.
BrechbühlUReyL, 1998Natur als kulturelle Leistung. Zur Entstehung des modernen Umweltdiskurses in der mehrsprachigen Schweiz (Seismo, Zürich)
10.
BüchiC, 2000“Röstigrabren”—Das Verhältnis zwischen deutscher und französischer Schweiz Geschichte und Perspektiven (NZZ, Zürich)
11.
CardSKMackinlayJDShneidermanB, 1999Readings in Information Visualization. Using Vision to Think (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA)
12.
ChenC, 2002Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Questfor Knowledge Visualization (Springer, Berlin)
13.
ClarkPJEvansFC, 1954, “Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations”Ecology35445–453
14.
CoxKR, 1969, “The voting decision in a spatial context”Progress in Geography. International Reviews of Current Research181–117
15.
DorlingD, 1995A New Social Atlas of Britain (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
16.
DuncanODDuncanB, 1955, “A methodological analysis of segregation indexes”American Sociological Review20210–217
17.
FabrigarLRWegenerDTMacCallumRCStrahanEJ, 1999, “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research”Psychological Methods4272–299
18.
FabrikantSISkupinA, 2005, “Cognitively plausible information visualization”, in Exploring Geovisualization Eds DykesJMacEachrenAMKraakMJ, (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 667–690
19.
FotheringhamAS, 2000, “A bluffer's guide to ‘A solution to the ecological inference problem”’Annals of the Association of American Geographers90582–586
20.
GiddensA, 1994Beyond Left and Right. The Future of Radical Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge)
21.
GiniC, 1912, “Variabilità e mutabilità”Studi Economico-giuridici, Università di Cagliari31–158, reprinted 1955 in Memorie de Metodologia Stastistica Eds PizettiESalveminiT, (Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Rome)
22.
HermannMLeutholdH, 2001, “Weltanschauung und ihre soziale Basis im Spiegel eidgenössischer Volksabstimmungen”Swiss Political Science Review7(4) 39–63
23.
HermannMLeutholdH, 2003aAtlas der politischen Landschaften. Ein weltanschauliches Porträt der Schweiz (vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich)
24.
HermannMLeutholdH, 2003b, “Deutsch und Welsch im Raum der Weltanschauungen”Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte60187–192
25.
HodgeDStaeheliL, 1992, “Social relations and geographic patterns of urban electoral behaviour”Urban Geography13307–333
26.
InglehartR, 1971, “The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies”American Political Science Review65991–1017
27.
InglehartR, 1977The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
28.
InglehartR, 2000, “Culture and democracy”, in Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress Eds HarrisonLHuntingtonS, (Basic Books, New York) pp 80–97
29.
JohnstonRJonesKSarkerRPropperCBurgessSBolsterA, 2004, “Party support and the neighbourhood effect: Spatial polarisation of the British electorate, 1991–2001”Political Geography23367–402
30.
KingG, 1997A Solution to the Problem of Ecological Inference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
31.
KingG, 2000, “Geography, statistics, and ecological inference”Annals ofthe Association of American Geographers90601–606
32.
KitscheltH, 1994The Transformation of European Social Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
33.
KitscheltH, 1995The New Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
KriesiH, 1993Political Mobilization and Social Change. The Dutch Case in Comparative Perspective (Avebury, London)
36.
KriesiHWernliBSciariniPGianniM, 1996Le Clivage Linguistique: Problemes de Comprehension entre les Communautes Linguistiques en Suisse (Swiss Statistical Office, Bern)
37.
KriesiHPapadopoulosIMarcinkowskiF, 2004Challenges for Democracy in the 21st Century proposal for a common research program of the Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) at ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, the Swiss Center for Studies on the Global Information Society (SwissGIS) at the University of Zurich, and the Institute of Political Science, University of Lausanne in a National Centre of Competence in Research
38.
KruskalJBWishM, 1978Multidimensional Scaling (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
39.
LakoffG, 1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About The Mind (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
40.
LakoffGJohnsonM, 1980Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
41.
LipsetSMRokkanS, 1967, “Cleavage structure, party systems and voters alignment: An introduction”, in Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives Eds LipsetSMRokkanS, (Free Press, New York) pp 1–64
42.
LohmöllerJ-BFalterJLinkAde RijkeJ, 1985, “Unemployment and the rise of national socialism: Contradicting results from different regional aggregations”, in Measuring the Unmeasurable Eds NijkampPLeitnerHWrigleyN, (Martinus Nijhoof, Den Haag) pp 357–370
43.
McPhersonM, 1983, “An ecology of affiliation”American Sociological Review48519–532
44.
McPhersonM, 2004, “A Blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation”Industrial and Corporate Change13(1) 263–280
45.
McPhersonMRanger-MooreJ, 1991, “Evolution on a dancing landscape: Organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space”Social Forces70(1) 19–42
46.
MayringP, 1988Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse—Grundlagen und Techniken (Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim)
47.
MonmonierMS, 1991How to Lie with Maps (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
48.
MonmonierMS, 2001Bushmanders and Bullwinkles. How Politicians Manipulate Electronic Maps and Census Data to Win Elections (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
Noelle-NeumannE, 1984The Spiral of Silence. Public Opinion—Our Social Skin (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
51.
O'LoughlinJ, 2000, “Can King's ecological inference method answer a social scientific puzzle: Who voted for the Nazi party in Weimar Germany?”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90592–601
52.
PattieCJohnstonR, 2000, “‘People who talk together vote together’: An exploration of contextual effects in Great Britain”Annals of the Association of American Geographers9042–66
53.
RobinsonWS, 1950, “Ecological correlations and the behaviour of individuals”American Sociological Review15351–357
54.
RouillerSFivazJSchwarzDWaaijenbergA, 2004Der Einsatz der Online-Wahlhilfe smartvote bei den kantonalen Wahlen in St. Gallen (Schlussbericht) http://www.smartvote.ch
55.
SchweizerischeBundeskanzlei, 2004Der Bund kurz erklärt (Information brochure of the Swiss government, Bern)
56.
SiegfriedA, 1913Tableau Politique de la France de l'Ouest sous la Troisieme Republique (Armand Colin, Paris)
57.
SilvermannBW, 1986Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall, London)
58.
SkupinA, 2002, “Cartographic approach to visualizing conference abstracts”IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications22(1) 50–58
59.
SkupinAFabrikantSI, 2003, “Spatialization methods: A cartographic research agenda for non-geographic information visualization”Cartography and Geographic Information Science30(2) 95–119
60.
TaylorPJ, 1992, “Politics in maps, maps in politics: A tribute to Brian Harley”Political Geography11127–129
61.
ThurstoneLL, 1947Multiple Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
62.
ToblerWR, 1970, “A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region”Economic Geography46234–240
63.
TrechselAMendezF, 2004The European Union andE-voting. Addressing the European Parliament's Internet Voting Challenge (Routledge, London)
64.
VesterMvon OertzenPGeilingHHermannTMüllerD, 2001Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)
