This paper presents an informal shape grammar that describes Louis Sullivan's system for ornamentation. The goal of the grammar is to serve as an analytical tool to describe Sullivan's existing designs, but also to generate new designs founded in the same logic. Towards this end, the grammar, which is organized into seven groups of rules, is used to generate several of Sullivan's compositions, as well as new designs by the author, as a vehicle both to explore the particular parameters of Sullivan's most intricate work, and to speculate about how Sullivan's system could be implemented in, and impacted by, contemporary technologies.
DollensD L, 2005, “A system of digital-botanic architecture”LEONARDO3814–21
3.
DuarteJ P, 2001Customizing Mass Housing: A Discursive Grammar for Siza's Malagueira Houses PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
4.
FramptonK, 1995Studies in Tectonic Culture (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
5.
JohnsonP, 1956, “Is Sullivan the father of functionalism?”ART news5545–57
6.
KnightT, 1994Transformations in Design: A Formal Approach to Stylistic Change and Innovation in the Visual Arts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
7.
LiA I-K, 2001A Shape Grammar for Teaching the Architectural Style of the Yingzao Fashi PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
8.
MarchLSteadmanP, 1974The Geometry of Environment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
MillonH, 1990, “The French Academy of Architecture: Foundation and program”, in The French Academy: Classicism and its Antagonists Ed. HargroveJ (University of Delaware Press, Newark, DE) pp 68–78
10.
MorrisonH, 1998Louis Sullivan Prophet of Modern Architecture (W W Norton, New York)
11.
OxmanR, 1997, “Design by re-representation: A model of visual reasoning in design”Design Studies18329–347
12.
PhillipsM G, 2007, “Design by searching: a system for creating and evaluating complex architectural assemblies”, SMArchS thesis, Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
13.
PurcellW J, 1915, “Woodbury County Court House, Sioux City, Iowa”, Purcell and Elmslie, Architects, firm archives 1915 (276), http://www.organica.org/pejn276_1.htm
14.
RolloJ, 1995, “Triangle and T-square: The windows of Frank Lloyd Wright”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2275–92
15.
SaidE W, 2006On Late Style: Music and Literature Against the Grain (Pantheon Books, New York)
16.
SassL, 2007, “A Palladian construction grammar—design reasoning with shape grammars and rapid prototyping”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3487–106
17.
ScullyV, 1959, “Louis Sullivan's architectural ornament: A brief note concerning humanist design in the age of force”Perspecta573–80
18.
StinyG, 1990, “What is a design?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1797–103
19.
StinyG, 1991, “Weights”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design19413–430
20.
StinyG, 2006Shape (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
StinyGMitchellW, 1978, “The Palladian grammar”Environment and Planning B55–18
22.
SullivanL, 1959The Autobiography of an Idea (Dover, New York)
23.
SullivanL, 1979Kindergarten Chats and Other Writing (Dover, New York)
24.
SullivanL, 1990A System of Architectural Ornament, According with a Philosophy of Man's Powers (Rizzoli, in cooperation with the Art Institute of Chicago, New York)
25.
TrillingJ, 2003Ornament: A Modern Perspective (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
26.
TwomblyR, 1986Louis Sullivan: His Life and Work (Viking, New York)
27.
Van OrmerG G, 1960, “Louis Sullivan's ornamentation as exemplified in the Carson Pirie Scott building”, Master's thesis, Department of Architecture, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
