Accessibility has become a key issue in modern urban planning. This paper aims to identify the impact of differences in spatial accessibility on the development of the built environment in cities. Using a few simple accessibility indicators, it tries to map out in a quantitative way the detailed implications of accessibility conditions for built-up areas, on the basis of a 25 m × 25 m grid cell approach. The statistical tool used here is logistic regression, followed by a GIS representation of the empirical results for four Dutch cities: Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam, and Utrecht.
AnselinL, 1990, “Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis”Journal of Regional Sciences30185–207
3.
AyturSARodriguezDAEvensonKRCatellierDJRosamundWD, 2008, “The sociodemographics of land use planning: Relationships to physical activity, accessibility, and equity”Health and Place14367–385
4.
BertoliniLle ClercqFKapoenL, 2005, “Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward”Transport Policy12207–220
5.
BhatCR, 2002Development of an Urban Accessibility Index: A SummaryCenter for Transportation Research, Bureau of Engineering Research, the University of Texas at, Austin, Austin, TX
6.
BhatCRGuoJY, 2007, “A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels”Transportation Research41506–526
7.
Bilbao-UbillosJ, 2008, “The costs of urban congestion: Estimation of welfare losses arising from congestion on cross-town link roads”Transportation Research A421098–1108
8.
BlijieB, 2005, “The impact of accessibility on residential choice: Empirical results of a discrete choice model”, in Proceedings of the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Associationhttp://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa05p626.html
9.
BlundenWR, 1971The Land- Use/Transportation System: Analysis and Synthesis (Pergamon Press, New York)
10.
BorzacchielloMTNijkampPScholtenH, 2009, “A logistic regression model for explaining urban development on the basis of accessibility: A case study on Napoli”International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development8300–313
11.
BruinsmaFRietveldP, 1993, “Urban agglomeration in European infrastructure networks”Urban Studies30919–934
12.
CEC, 2001European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide White Paper, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
13.
ChangJSLeeJ-H, 2008, “Accessibility analysis of Korean high-speed rail: A case study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area”Transport Review2887–103
14.
ChenCMcKnightCE, 2007, “Does the built environment make a difference? Additional evidence from the daily activity and travel behavior of homemakers living in New York City and suburbs”Journal of Transport Geography15380–395
15.
ChengJBertoliniLle ClercqF, 2007, “Measuring sustainable accessibility”Transportation Research Record number 2017, 16–25
16.
ChristensenR, 1997Loglinear Models and Logistic Regression2nd edition (Springer, Berlin)
17.
CurtisC, 2008, “Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge”Transport Policy15104–112
18.
DebrezionG, 2006Railway Impacts on Real Estate Prices PhD thesis, RP 389, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam
19.
DebrezionGPelsERietveldP, 2008, “Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice”Transportation Research Part E45270–283
20.
de la BarraT, 1989Integrated Land-use and Transport: Decision Chains and Hierarchies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
21.
DongXBen-AkivaMEBowmanJLWalkerJL, 2006, “Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility”Transportation Research A40163–180
22.
EttemaDTimmermansH, 2007, “Space–time accessibility under conditions of uncertain travel times: Theory and numerical simulations”Geographic Analysis39217–240
23.
FarringtonJH, 2007, “The new narrative of accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography”Journal of Transport Geography15319–330
24.
FragkiasMSetoKC, 2007, “Modeling urban growth in data-sparse environments: A new approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34858–883
25.
GeursKTvan EckRitsema JR, 2001Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications RIVM report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, http://www.mnp.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/408505006.pdf
26.
GeursKTvan WeeB, 2004, “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions”Journal of Transport Geography12127–140
27.
GeursKTvan WeeBRietveldP, 2006, “Accessibility appraisal of integrated land-use – transport strategies: Methodology and case study for the Netherlands Randstad area”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33639–660
28.
GutierrezJ, 2001, “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid – Barcelona – French border”Journal of Transport Geography9229–242
29.
HaldenD, 2002, “Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians”Transport Policy9313–324
30.
HandySLNiemeierDA, 1997, “Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives”Environment and Planning A291175–1194
31.
HansenWG, 1959, “How accessibility shapes land use”Journal of American Institute of Planners2573–76
32.
HewkoJSmoyer-TomicKEHodgsonMJ, 2002, “Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error matter?”Environment and Planning A341185–1206
KoenigJG, 1980, “Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application”Transportation9145–172
35.
KoomenEStillwellJBakemaAScholtenHJ, 2007Modelling Land-use Change: Progress and Applications (Springer, Berlin)
36.
KoomenERietveldPBacaoF, 2009, “The third dimension in urban geography”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design forthcoming
37.
KwanM-PWeberJ, 2008, “Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land-use travel interaction”Applied Geography28110–123
38.
LautsoKSpiekermannKWegenerMSheppardISteadmanPMartinoADomingoRGaydaS, 2004, “PROPOLIS: Planning and research of policies for land use and transport for increasing urban sustainability”, final report to European Commission Fifth Framework Contract EVK4-1999-00005, http://www.cipra.org/alpknowhow/publications/propolis
39.
LopezEGutierrezJGomezG, 2008, “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: An accessibility approach”European Planning Studies16277–301
40.
MackiewiczARatajczakW, 1996, “Towards a new definition of topological accessibility”Transportation Research3047–79
41.
MartellatoDNijkampP, 1999, “The concept of accessibility revisited”, in Accessibility, Trade and Locational Behaviour Ed. ReggianiA (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 17–40
42.
MartinJCReggianiA, 2007, “Recent methodological developments to measure spatial interactions: Synthetic accessibility indices applied to high speed train investments”Transportation Review27551–571
43.
MartinezFJ, 1995, “Access: The transport–land use economic link”Transportation Research B29457–470
44.
PoolerJ, 1995, “The use of spatial separation in the measurement of transportation accessibility”Transportation Research Part A29421–427
45.
ReggianiA, 1998Accessibility, Trade and Locational Behaviour (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
46.
ReggianiABucciP, 2007, “Accessibility and network structures, the case of commuting in Germany”, paper presented at NECTAR Cluster Meeting, Stuttgart, 26–27 October; available from Department of Economics, University of Bologna
47.
RietveldPBruinsmaFR, 1998Is Transport Infrastructure Effective? (Springer, Berlin)
48.
VicenteSanchez AMartinZamorano C, 2006, “Geographic information system analysis of accessibility as indicator of potential land use changes and of induced impacts on the environment”Transportation Research Record number 1983, 24–32
49.
ShortridgeA, 2007, “Practical limits of Moran's autocorrelation index for raster class maps”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems31362–371
50.
SrourIMKockelmanKMDunnTP, 2002, “Accessibility indices: Connection to residential land prices and location choices”Transportation Research Record number 1805, 25–34
51.
StraatemeierT, 2008, “How to plan for regional accessibility”Transport Policy15127–137
52.
SusiloYOMaatK, 2007, “The influence of built environment to the trends in commuting journeys in the Netherlands”Transportation34589–609
53.
TomlinD, 1990Geographic Information Systems and Cartographic Modelling (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
54.
TschoppMFrohlichPAxhausenKW, 2005, “Accessibility and spatial development in Switzerland during the last 50 years: A multilevel regression approach”, in Access to Destinations Eds LevinsonDMKrizekKJ (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 361–376
55.
VandenbulckeGSteenberghenTThomasI, 2009, “Mapping accessibility in Belgium: A tool for land-use and transport planning?”Journal of Transport Geography1739–53
WilligersJFloorHvan WeeB, 2007, “Accessibility indicators for location choices of offices: An application to the intraregional distributive effects of high-speed rail in the Netherlands”Environment and Planning A392086–2098
58.
ZondagPPietersM, 2005, “Influence of accessibility on residential location choice”Transportation Research Record number 1902, 63–70
