Design is increasingly perceived as a social process that involves the participation of multiple agents with multiple, and often conflicting, needs, knowledge, and goals. It is proposed here that the notion of coordination is an apposite concept for capturing the social distributed character of design and for reconciling social and cognitive perceptions of design activity. Coordination places emphasis on issues of interdependency, complexity, and distribution, and facilitates the understanding of design by including notions of collaboration as well as conflict. Additionally, coordination is used to capture the generative, creative aspects of design. In this study I use insights from complexity science to offer an understanding of coordination as a process that entails the emergence of collective design solutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckoffR L, 1974Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems (John Wiley, New York)
2.
AlexiouK, 2009, “Complexity and coordination in collaborative design”, in Embracing Complexity in Design Eds AlexiouKJohnsonJZamenopoulosT (Routledge, London) pp 73–93
3.
ArcherB L, 1970, “An overview of the structure of the design process”, in Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning Ed. MooreG T (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 285–307
4.
AriasEEdenHFischerGGormanAScharffE, 2000, “Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design”ACM Transactions on Computer — Human Interaction784–113
5.
AshbyR W, 1956An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman and Hall, London)
6.
Bar-YamY, 2004a, “Multiscale variety in complex systems”Complexity9(4) 37–45
7.
Bar-YamY, 2004b, “A mathematical theory of strong emergence using multiscale variety”Complexity9(6) 15–24
8.
BattyM, 1979, “On planning processes”, in Resources and Planning Eds GoodallBKirbyA (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 17–45
9.
BonabeauEDessallesJ-L, 1997, “Detection and emergence”Intellectica2585–94
10.
BucciarelliL L, 1988, “An ethnographic perspective on engineering design”Design Studies9159–168
ClanceyW J, 1997Situated Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
13.
CorningP A, 2002, “The re-emergence of ‘emergence’: a venerable concept in search of a theory”Complexity7(6) 18–30
14.
CoyneR D, 1988Logic Models of Design (Pitman, London)
15.
CoyneR D, 1991, “Modelling the emergence of design descriptions across schemata”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design18427–458
16.
CoyneR DNewtonS, 1990, “Design reasoning by association”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1739–56
17.
CraigD LZimringC, 2000, “Supporting collaborative design groups as design communities”Design Studies21187–204
18.
CrossNCrossA C, 1995, “Observations of teamwork and social processes in design”Design Studies16143–170
19.
DorstKCrossN, 2001, “Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution”Design Studies22425–437
20.
EdmondsB, 1999Syntactic Measures of Complexity PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Manchester
21.
GeroJ S, 1990, “Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design”AI Magazine11(4) 26–36
22.
GeroJ S, 2000, “Computational models of innovative and creative design processes”Technological Forecasting and Social Change64183–196
23.
GeroJ SKannengiesserU, 2004, “The situated function — behaviour — structure framework”Design Studies25373–391
24.
GipsJStinyG, 1980, “Production systems and grammars: a uniform characterization”Environment and Planning B7399–408
25.
GoelV, 1988, “Complicating the ‘logic of design’”Design Studies9229–234
26.
GoldschmidtG, 1995, “The designer as a team of one”Design Studies16189–209
27.
HollanJHutchinsEKirshD, 2000, “Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human — computer interaction research”ACM Transactions on Computer — Human Interaction7174–196
28.
HutchinsE, 1991, “The social organization of distributed cognition”, in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition Eds ResnickLLevineJTeasleyS (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) pp 283–307
29.
HutchinsE, 1995Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
30.
KnightT, 2003, “Computing with emergence”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30125–155
31.
KvanT, 2000, “Collaborative design: what is it?”Automation in Construction9409–415
32.
LaveJWengerE, 1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
33.
McLoughlinB, 1977Control and Urban Planning (Faber and Faber, London)
34.
MaherM L, 1994, “Creative design using a genetic algorithm”Computing in Civil EngineeringASCE, pp 2014–2021
35.
MaherM L, 2000, “A model of co-evolutionary design”Engineering with Computers16195–208
36.
MaherM LPoonJ, 1995, “Co-evolution of the fitness function and design solution for design exploration”Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computing1240–244
37.
MaloneT WCrowstonK, 1990, “What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?”, in Proceedings of CSCW 1990 (ACM, Los Angeles, CA) pp 357–370
38.
MarchL, 1976, “The logic of design and the question of value”, in The Architecture of Form Ed. MarchL (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–40
39.
NardiB A, 1995, “Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition”, in Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human — Computer Interaction Ed. NardiB A (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
40.
NewellAShawJ SSimonS A, 1957Elements of a Theory of Problem Solving Rand Corporation Report P-971
PeirceC S, 1934Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol 5 Pragmatism and Pragmaticism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
43.
PeirceC S, 1958Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol 7 Science and Philosophy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
44.
PoonJMaherM L, 1997, “Co-evolution and emergence in design”Artificial Intelligence in Engineering11319–327
45.
RoozenburgN F M, 1993, “On the pattern of reasoning in innovative design”Design Studies144–18
46.
RoozenburgN F MEekelsJ, 1995Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
47.
SchönD A, 1983The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Arena, Aldershot, Hants)
48.
SuchmanL A, 1987Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human — Machine Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
49.
VygotskyL S, 1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
50.
WienerN, 1948Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
51.
ZamenopoulosTAlexiouK, 2003, “Structuring the plan design process as a coordination problem: the paradigm of distributed learning control coordination”, in Advanced Spatial Analysis: The CASA Book of GIS Eds LongleyPBattyM (ESRI Press, Redlands, CA) pp 407–426
52.
ZamenopoulosTAlexiouK, 2007, “Rethinking the cybernetic basis of design: the concepts of control and organization”Kybernetes361570–1589
